Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
Three mind-numbingly obscure and/or dull questions about loading gauge: Firstly, what effect does wider gauge have on passenger operations? Are all passenger trains built to W6, or are there wider trains to take advantage of the bigger gauge on (some of) the main lines? What gauge is Crossrail being built to? Mainline, i know, but which? W6? W6A? Something wider? AFAICT, the GW is W8 all the way to Paddington, and the GE is W8 to Forest Gate or thereabouts (BICBW), so there could be a vague case for more space, if the first question has the appropriate answer. What's the loading gauge of the subsurface lines? I read somewhere that it's the same as National Rail (don't know which); this must be true for some of it, since there were plans to run mainline services over bits of it (Liverpool Street to, er, somewhere along the north side), but it must vary, since not all the current LU trains can fit down all bits of it (in fact, AIUI, _no_ current subsurface stock can get everywhere). What is the least common denominator gauge like? Presumably, this is what the proposed single subsurface stock will be built to; are they going to have to be titchy? Are they going to regauge bits of the network instead? Thanks, tom -- Just because Congresspeople do it, doesn't mean it's right. -- Ian York |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Tom Anderson writes What's the loading gauge of the subsurface lines? Varies. I read somewhere that it's the same as National Rail (don't know which); I don't think so - I believe that A60/62 stock is too wide for parts of the NR network. this must be true for some of it, since there were plans to run mainline services over bits of it (Liverpool Street to, er, somewhere along the north side), You might be able to get some NR stock that way, but there will be various issues to resolve. In particular, it tends to be longer and will therefore have problems on curves. AIUI, _no_ current subsurface stock can get everywhere). I can't think of anywhere that C stock isn't allowed to go. There's a limit of 4 cars when in service on the ELL, but that's all. What is the least common denominator gauge like? Presumably, this is what the proposed single subsurface stock will be built to; are they going to have to be titchy? Are they going to regauge bits of the network instead? D stock isn't any wider than C stock; it's limited where it can go because: * some stations (like Bayswater) can't fit 6*D though they can fit 6*C; * the suspension has been stiffened and it's therefore only allowed on track maintained appropriately (which, off-Line, means Acton Town to Northfields Depot). My understanding is that the new stock will be built to C/D loading gauge, running in different lengths: 4 cars for the ELL, 6 cars for Circle, H&C, and Wimbleware services, 7 cars for the District via Tower Hill, and 8 cars for the Metropolitan. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
For NR you could look at GE/GN8573 on the RSSB website
http://www.rgsonline.co.uk John In article , Clive D. W. Feather writes In article , Tom Anderson writes What's the loading gauge of the subsurface lines? Varies. I read somewhere that it's the same as National Rail (don't know which); I don't think so - I believe that A60/62 stock is too wide for parts of the NR network. this must be true for some of it, since there were plans to run mainline services over bits of it (Liverpool Street to, er, somewhere along the north side), You might be able to get some NR stock that way, but there will be various issues to resolve. In particular, it tends to be longer and will therefore have problems on curves. AIUI, _no_ current subsurface stock can get everywhere). I can't think of anywhere that C stock isn't allowed to go. There's a limit of 4 cars when in service on the ELL, but that's all. What is the least common denominator gauge like? Presumably, this is what the proposed single subsurface stock will be built to; are they going to have to be titchy? Are they going to regauge bits of the network instead? D stock isn't any wider than C stock; it's limited where it can go because: * some stations (like Bayswater) can't fit 6*D though they can fit 6*C; * the suspension has been stiffened and it's therefore only allowed on track maintained appropriately (which, off-Line, means Acton Town to Northfields Depot). My understanding is that the new stock will be built to C/D loading gauge, running in different lengths: 4 cars for the ELL, 6 cars for Circle, H&C, and Wimbleware services, 7 cars for the District via Tower Hill, and 8 cars for the Metropolitan. -- John Alexander, |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Clive D. W. Feather wrote:
In article , Tom Anderson writes What's the loading gauge of the subsurface lines? Varies. I should have known! AIUI, _no_ current subsurface stock can get everywhere). â I can't think of anywhere that C stock isn't allowed to go. There's a limit of 4 cars when in service on the ELL, but that's all. It was once (in ) said: "[...] 6-car C-Stock. These certainly have clearance issues in the Dagenham area (meaning no through routing Hammersmith Met - Upminster), and may have on the Richmond/Ealing branches." I take it this is not in fact the case. Aha. A bit of googling turns up http://billz1064.proboards1.com/index.cgi?board=General&action=display&num=1084723 959; there used to be some sort of problem at Dagenham East, which meant the trains had to go through the station slowly or something, but this is no longer a problem. What is the least common denominator gauge like? Presumably, this is what the proposed single subsurface stock will be built to; are they going to have to be titchy? Are they going to regauge bits of the network instead? My understanding is that the new stock will be built to C/D loading gauge, running in different lengths: 4 cars for the ELL, 6 cars for Circle, H&C, and Wimbleware services, 7 cars for the District via Tower Hill, and 8 cars for the Metropolitan. Okay. I assume it's not possible (or at least easy) to add and remove cars to a train; that means there won't actually be a single fleet for the whole subsurface system, since trains will be still be differentiated by their length (eg 8-car sets will only be able to run on the Met). Thanks for all the info. tom -- I'm angry, but not Milk and Cheese angry. -- Mike Froggatt |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Clive D. W. Feather wrote:
D stock isn't any wider than C stock; it's limited where it can go because: * some stations (like Bayswater) can't fit 6*D though they can fit 6*C; * the suspension has been stiffened and it's therefore only allowed on track maintained appropriately (which, off-Line, means Acton Town to Northfields Depot). LOL! You can't have travelled on the District for several years if you think that D-stock can only run on track that has been "maintained appropriately". Seriously, Tube Prune's website* says "The poor quality of LU track has led to cracking in the bogie frames and some derailments due to the stiffness of the frame. The D Stock bogies are being replaced by new bogies similar to those supplied by Adtranz for the new Northern Line 1995 Tube Stock. These bogies have flexible frames designed to overcome the dreadful state of LU trackwork." That page was last updated a year ago, so maybe the bogie changes are now complete. Can anyone confirm this? * http://www.trainweb.org/tubeprune/Rolling%20Stock.htm -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Tom Anderson writes I can't think of anywhere that C stock isn't allowed to go. There's a limit of 4 cars when in service on the ELL, but that's all. "[...] 6-car C-Stock. These certainly have clearance issues in the Dagenham area (meaning no through routing Hammersmith Met - Upminster), and may have on the Richmond/Ealing branches." [...] there used to be some sort of problem at Dagenham East, which meant the trains had to go through the station slowly or something, I think that was a purely temporary issue. My understanding is that the new stock will be built to C/D loading gauge, running in different lengths: 4 cars for the ELL, 6 cars for Circle, H&C, and Wimbleware services, 7 cars for the District via Tower Hill, and 8 cars for the Metropolitan. Okay. I assume it's not possible (or at least easy) to add and remove cars to a train; I suspect that there'll be cab cars and non-cab cars (the trains are supposed to be walk-through), and cutting a formation to add or remove the latter will be relatively easy. There'd be no great need in normal service, though. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard J." wrote in message
.uk... Clive D. W. Feather wrote: D stock isn't any wider than C stock; it's limited where it can go because: * some stations (like Bayswater) can't fit 6*D though they can fit 6*C; * the suspension has been stiffened and it's therefore only allowed on track maintained appropriately (which, off-Line, means Acton Town to Northfields Depot). LOL! You can't have travelled on the District for several years if you think that D-stock can only run on track that has been "maintained appropriately". Seriously, Tube Prune's website* says "The poor quality of LU track has led to cracking in the bogie frames and some derailments due to the stiffness of the frame. The D Stock bogies are being replaced by new bogies similar to those supplied by Adtranz for the new Northern Line 1995 Tube Stock. These bogies have flexible frames designed to overcome the dreadful state of LU trackwork." That page was last updated a year ago, so maybe the bogie changes are now complete. Can anyone confirm this? * http://www.trainweb.org/tubeprune/Rolling%20Stock.htm -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) Yes, the D Stock bogie replacement is now complete. The D Stock is now starting a body refurbishment. For other queries on this topic, the new SSL Stock has been designed to the A Stock gauge and Metronet are arguing with Bombardier over it because Metronet don't want to pay for all the infrastructure work necessary to allow the new stock to run all over the SSL. Cars are standard 3 d/doors/side with cabs at the ends of trains only. Wide walk-through ends will be provided unless LU insist on end doors as per their standards. No of trains will be: 72 x 8-cars for the Metropolitan from 2009 40 x 6-cars for Circle & H&C from 2012 78 x 7-cars for District from 2014 Tubeprune |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tubeprune wrote:
Yes, the D Stock bogie replacement is now complete. The D Stock is now starting a body refurbishment. For other queries on this topic, the new SSL Stock has been designed to the A Stock gauge and Metronet are arguing with Bombardier over it because Metronet don't want to pay for all the infrastructure work necessary to allow the new stock to run all over the SSL. Cars are standard 3 d/doors/side with cabs at the ends of trains only. Wide walk-through ends will be provided unless LU insist on end doors as per their standards. Thanks for letting us know about this. Will you be updating your excellent site soon to share this new knowledge? No of trains will be: 72 x 8-cars for the Metropolitan from 2009 What sort of seats will these trains have? Presumably the stock will all be the exact same, differing only in seating. 40 x 6-cars for Circle & H&C from 2012 78 x 7-cars for District from 2014 Again, what will the seating arrangements be? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "TheOneKEA" wrote in message oups.com... What sort of seats will these trains have? Presumably the stock will all be the exact same, differing only in seating. Seating will be the same on three versions. There will be a lot less seats than now because LU insists on having 1000mm between seats for wheelchairs to pass between them. So, you will have to stand every day because someone might want to have a wheelchair on the train once in the next 35 years! Tubeprune |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tubeprune wrote:
"TheOneKEA" wrote in message oups.com... What sort of seats will these trains have? Presumably the stock will all be the exact same, differing only in seating. Seating will be the same on three versions. There will be a lot less seats than now because LU insists on having 1000mm between seats for wheelchairs to pass between them. So, you will have to stand every day because someone might want to have a wheelchair on the train once in the next 35 years! With that kind of thinking, one might as well transfer ownership of the fast lines from Harrow North to Moor Park, and hence to Amersham, to Network Rail! Bucks commuters won't stand for nasty transverse seating that crams them together like C-stock cattle; they complained when the T stock went away and they'll complain even louder when the A stock goes away. Not that Chiltern would mind, of course... Have LU lots their minds? Or is it just the useless nanny-state H&S folks pushing this rubbish? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
2009 Stock loading gauge | London Transport | |||
Loading gauge question | London Transport | |||
CTRL loading gauge | London Transport | |||
DLR track gauge | London Transport | |||
LUL track gauge not the same as BR gauge? | London Transport |