Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 00:29:17 +0000, Michael Hoffman
wrote: Greg Hennessy wrote: Au contraire, I've shown that your laughable attempt to dismiss the long established netiquette RFC on the basis that it's not an IETF standard is diversionary nonsense. You can call things nonsense without an understandable argument as much as you want but that doesn't make it true. ![]() What is 'not' understandable about the fallacy in your IETF argument ? greg -- Yeah - straight from the top of my dome As I rock, rock, rock, rock, rock the microphone |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The real reasons behind the strike? | London Transport | |||
Delays on 8 & 9 December | London Transport | |||
Underground delays = online delays | London Transport | |||
Central line delays? | London Transport | |||
Compensation For Delays | London Transport |