Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:55:34 -0000, "John Rowland"
wrote: "Peter Masson" wrote in message ... This seems to have been promoted by a separate company, the 'Tooting, Merton & Wimbledon', but sold out to the LSWR and LB&SCR jointly before opening. It originally had two routes between Wimbledon and Tooting, the current one used by Thameslink via Haydons Road, and one that took the Tramlink route to Merton Park then looped via Merton Abbey to Tooting. From Tooting the route to Ludgate Hill was the Thameslink route via Streatham, Tulse Hill, Herne Hill and Elephant & Castle to Ludgate Hill. But why was the now abandoned route ever built at all? To make a terminal loop for operational efficiency? -- Peter Lawrence |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JRS: In article , dated Mon, 13 Dec 2004
14:54:09, seen in news:uk.transport.london, Paul Terry posted : In message ailgate.org, Troy Steadman writes Immediately to the north of the current line from New Malden to Raynes Park is a "ghost" line, bridged and laid out as if for rails and now connecting IMMSMC the former Water Works at Berrylands to London. Do you know anything about that one? On 19th-century maps it is an embankment marked "Lambeth Water Company" - see http://www.old-maps.co.uk/ and look up New Malden. I suspect it is simply a water main from the riverside reservoirs at Surbiton (Long Ditton) up towards the company's reservoirs at Streatham and Brixton - and that it just happens to be above ground at this point. I can't see any sign that there was ever a railway on top of this embankment - rather the railway and water main were built side-by-side. There is indeed a water route along there; pipes can be seen at Elm Road level crossing. Water can generally be seen escaping into Coombe Road just north of the railway bridge, and from time to time appears in bulk there, instead of in the local plumbing. IIRC, there is a fair-sized aperture under the A3, just to the north of that used by the main line - adequate for at least one track. But I don't recall there being room for more tracks on the trackbed under the Alric Road - Dukes Avenue footbridge, though there is land between the trackbed and the properties to the north. -- © John Stockton, Surrey, UK. DOS 3.3, 6.20; Win98. © Web URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/ - FAQqish topics, acronyms & links. PAS EXE TXT ZIP via URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/programs/00index.htm My DOS URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/batfiles.htm - also batprogs.htm. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Lawrence" wrote in message
... On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:55:34 -0000, "John Rowland" wrote: "Peter Masson" wrote in message ... This seems to have been promoted by a separate company, the 'Tooting, Merton & Wimbledon', but sold out to the LSWR and LB&SCR jointly before opening. It originally had two routes between Wimbledon and Tooting, the current one used by Thameslink via Haydons Road, and one that took the Tramlink route to Merton Park then looped via Merton Abbey to Tooting. From Tooting the route to Ludgate Hill was the Thameslink route via Streatham, Tulse Hill, Herne Hill and Elephant & Castle to Ludgate Hill. But why was the now abandoned route ever built at all? To make a terminal loop for operational efficiency? I doubt that - it wasn't done anywhere else. In particular, a terminal loop with multiple stations means that passengers are unhappy if the train waits a long time on the loop, meaning that trains would have to spend most or all of their recovery time at the Central London terminus instead, and their isn't room for that unless you have huge Central London termini where land is very expensive. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:39:51 -0000, "John Rowland"
wrote: "Peter Lawrence" wrote in message ... On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:55:34 -0000, "John Rowland" wrote: "Peter Masson" wrote in message ... This seems to have been promoted by a separate company, the 'Tooting, Merton & Wimbledon', but sold out to the LSWR and LB&SCR jointly before opening. It originally had two routes between Wimbledon and Tooting, the current one used by Thameslink via Haydons Road, and one that took the Tramlink route to Merton Park then looped via Merton Abbey to Tooting. From Tooting the route to Ludgate Hill was the Thameslink route via Streatham, Tulse Hill, Herne Hill and Elephant & Castle to Ludgate Hill. But why was the now abandoned route ever built at all? To make a terminal loop for operational efficiency? I doubt that - it wasn't done anywhere else. In particular, a terminal loop with multiple stations means that passengers are unhappy if the train waits a long time on the loop, meaning that trains would have to spend most or all of their recovery time at the Central London terminus instead, and their isn't room for that unless you have huge Central London termini where land is very expensive. The LBSC I believe ran London Bridge to London Bridge services via Crystal Palace and via Selhurst. And the LSWR had (and their sucessors still have) the Hounslow and Kingston loops. So both companies had som experience of loop services. Alternatively their aims may have been different, LSWR wanting a connection to the City and the LBSC wishing to serve more suburbs like Merton. -- Peter Lawrence |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Lawrence" wrote in message
... On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:39:51 -0000, "John Rowland" wrote: "Peter Lawrence" wrote in message ... To make a terminal loop for operational efficiency? I doubt that - it wasn't done anywhere else. [...] London Bridge to London Bridge services via Crystal Palace and via Selhurst [...] the Hounslow and Kingston loops. blush Forgot about them. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SWT Summer Madness | London Transport | |||
Oyster Madness | London Transport | |||
Trivia: Hook Underpass (Ace of Spades) | London Transport | |||
Trivia: Declining passenger numbers | London Transport | |||
Obscure dictionary trivia | London Transport |