Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A discounted "through" bus fare would be excellent but could be open to
abuse - if it were based on a reasonable time allowance (say, 45 mins between touching in on the first bus and the second) then you could make a short bus journey, get off and do something, and get back on the return bus. Some while back there was some discussion about capping on the Yahoo! Tramlink group. At the moment the requirement (*) for passengers to touch-in before every leg of a tram journey makes Pre-Pay more expensive than paper tickets for those journeys requiring a change of tram. When capping comes along this anomaly is supposed to be corrected. We couldn't figure out anyway this could be done unless time allowances are used in the way you describe for a possible "through" bus fare in which case the 'abuse' you describe would inevitably be possible. However I don't think we need to consider it an 'abuse' at all. It sounds like a very attractive improvement to the fare model to me. (*) Why there is such a requirement is baffling of course when the Pre-Pay card must carry just as much information as a printed ticket, yet just the latter is accepted for through journeys. Clearly feeder buses might be an issue, but not changes of tram. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Strangeness with PrePay capping and topping up | London Transport | |||
Oyster Prepay capping publicity | London Transport | |||
Prepay Capping Tube Magazine | London Transport | |||
Oyster Prepay capping | London Transport | |||
Oyster prepay capping | London Transport |