Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard J." wrote in message
k... Mrs Redboots wrote: Niklas Karlsson wrote to uk.transport.london on Sun, 9 Jan 2005: That's because the rule was changed some years ago. Before then "priorité à droite" used to apply to roundabouts, giving joining traffic the priority. In the same way that they used "priorité à droite" to give priority to a minor road that joined a major road, forcing traffic travelling at high speed to brake to let a slow-moving tractor pull out in front. I wonder what the French road safety rule-makers were smoking when they came up with that rule! |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Richard J.
wrote: Mrs Redboots wrote: Niklas Karlsson wrote to uk.transport.london on Sun, 9 Jan 2005: It is to be hoped that if we ever *do* change to driving on the right, we don't adopt the Dutch and German rule of traffic joining a roundabout having priority over traffic already on the roundabout. Sweden has not; the traffic on the roundabout has priority. (Unless this has changed very recently.) Anything else seems very silly, really, IMAO. In France the traffic on the roundabout has priority, too, and usually there are large notices telling traffic on the joining road that it doesn't have priority. That's because the rule was changed some years ago. Before then "priorité à droite" used to apply to roundabouts, giving joining traffic the priority. Yes, and awful jams resulted! Michael Bell -- |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard J." wrote in message
k... Mrs Redboots wrote: Niklas Karlsson wrote to uk.transport.london on Sun, 9 Jan 2005: That's because the rule was changed some years ago. Before then "priorité à droite" used to apply to roundabouts, giving joining traffic the priority. In the same way that they used "priorité à droite" to give priority to a minor road that joined a major road, forcing traffic travelling at high speed to brake to let a slow-moving tractor pull out in front. I wonder what the French road safety rule-makers were smoking when they came up with that rule! I believe in New Zealand (or maybe Australia) you have to give way to oncoming traffic that it indicating to turn right (ie your left) across your path into a side road. |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Martin Underwood wrote: "Niklas Karlsson" wrote in message ... Mark Brader wrote on Sun, 09 Jan 2005 04:44:21 -0000: John Rowland: Nearly all London squares have a clockwise one-way system, even though when all of the roads in and out of the square are one-way, an anti-clockwise one-way system is superior (because drivers have better visibility when curving to the left). ... Perhaps this was done in preparation for a changeover to driving on the right. After all, now that Britain is part of the EU... Sweden had left-hand driving until September 3, 1967. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dagen_H The costs of doing this in the UK today would be prohibitive, both to highway departments and to private individuals: every road junction would need to have its white lines repainted on the other side; motorway junctions and roundabouts would need their entry and exit roads re-aligning (assuming that entry and exit roads are curved differently - maybe this isn't the case); every car would need to scrapped and replaced with an LHD car. I remember calculating at the time that the Swedish change-over cost 2 week's GNP. That's an awful lot of money. And for what? Junction 8 on the M1 was designed "wrong way round" in Mrs Castle's time to test the idea of designing junctions so that they could be changed over to right-hand drive, but the experiment was never repeated. Michael Bell -- |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message ,
Martin Underwood writes Which countries still drive on the left? Not Gibralter. But add India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Malaysia, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe, South Africa. All 74 are listed at: http://users.pandora.be/worldstandar...tm#leftdriving -- Paul Terry |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 17:53:03 -0000, "Martin Underwood"
wrote: Which countries still drive on the left? - UK/Ireland, obviously - Channel Islands - Australia - Malta - Gibraltar? Or does that drive on the left like Spain? - Japan (I wonder why) What about former British colonies like India? I *think* they still drive on the left. Anywhere else? Malaysia, Pakistan, Bangadesh, Thailand, parts of southern Africa.. someone must have a list on line somewhere. http://users.pandora.be/worldstandar...tm#leftdriving gives 74 places and a pretty map. -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Martin Underwood" wrote in message ... "Richard J." wrote in message news ![]() Martin Underwood wrote: "Niklas Karlsson" wrote in message ... Ever noticed those white oval plates with GB on them? Ever thought how their owners managed to drive in LHD countries? The idea that you would have to scrap all RHD cars if we changed the rule of the road is absurd. Yes, there are some problems, and overtaking on narrow single-carriageway roads without a passenger to help you is nasty , but I've never had a problem on a motorway apart from paying at the péage where the kiosk is on the British nearside. If I had to drive in mainland Europe, I'd always hire a car locally and wouldn't contemplate taking my own RHD car over there Having done both, I find that sitting on the wrong side of the car is far harder to get used to than positioning myself on the wrong side of the road. With my RHD car I just have to accept that I can't overtake on single carriageway roads, but fortunately most journeys nowadays are on motorways. With a LHD car I still position myself on the right half of the carriageway and end up with the bulk of the car: in the kerb, scraping a wall or occupying both lanes of a dual carriageway Which countries still drive on the left? - UK/Ireland, obviously - Channel Islands - Australia - Malta - Gibraltar? Or does that drive on the left like Spain? - Japan (I wonder why) What about former British colonies like India? I *think* they still drive on the left. Anywhere else? Most of Arfica. Apparently, by population a larger percentage of the world nominaly drives on the Left than the right, but most of the countries that make up this large total have very low car ownership tim |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Martin Underwood" wrote in message ... It is to be hoped that if we ever *do* change to driving on the right, we don't adopt the Dutch and German rule of traffic joining a roundabout having priority over traffic already on the roundabout. This rule seems to have gone out of use. I have never seen a roundabout where it is still used. It is still common for a side road to have priority over the main road though. tim |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 22:51:49 +0100, "tim"
wrote: It is still common for a side road to have priority over the main road though. This in itself isn't unknown in British towns. It's normally achieved by way of a mini roundabout. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK When replying please use neil at the above domain 'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read. |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Martin Underwood" wrote in message ... "Richard J." wrote in message k... Mrs Redboots wrote: Niklas Karlsson wrote to uk.transport.london on Sun, 9 Jan 2005: That's because the rule was changed some years ago. Before then "priorité à droite" used to apply to roundabouts, giving joining traffic the priority. In the same way that they used "priorité à droite" to give priority to a minor road that joined a major road, forcing traffic travelling at high speed to brake to let a slow-moving tractor pull out in front. I wonder what the French road safety rule-makers were smoking when they came up with that rule! I believe in New Zealand (or maybe Australia) you have to give way to oncoming traffic that it indicating to turn right (ie your left) across your path into a side road. Not here. Peter Sydney |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|