Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Rowland wrote:
Anyway, Queen Square is all clockwise except for the southeast corner, which is two way... now *that's* confusing. Russell Square now has a Northbound bus lane on the East side, so that that side is 2-way. However, if I remember correctly, there is a physical barrier (kerbstones or similar) between the two lanes. -- John Ray |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Martin Underwood" wrote in message
... "Richard J." wrote in message news ![]() Martin Underwood wrote: "Niklas Karlsson" wrote in message ... Ever noticed those white oval plates with GB on them? Ever thought how their owners managed to drive in LHD countries? The idea that you would have to scrap all RHD cars if we changed the rule of the road is absurd. Yes, there are some problems, and overtaking on narrow single-carriageway roads without a passenger to help you is nasty , but I've never had a problem on a motorway apart from paying at the péage where the kiosk is on the British nearside. If I had to drive in mainland Europe, I'd always hire a car locally and wouldn't contemplate taking my own RHD car over there - especially if I was on my own and didn't have a passenger in the front seat who could check the door mirror for overtaking traffic as I would if I was driving an LHD car. Having to take my eyes off the road ahead while I checked and checked again in the opposite mirror (or even over my left shoulder, peering between the door pillars) is just too dangerous. I know plenty of people do it, but not me. RHD cars would effectively be priced out of the market, firstly because their resale value would be much less than for an equivalent LHD car, and secondly because the insurance would be so much greater... because insurance companies perceive "wrong-sided" cars to be a much greater risk. OK, so the problem would gradually decline as old RHD cars were replaced with new LHD cars, but it would take a long time. Realistically, you'd need to combine the changeover of cars and roads: without a change of cars, there'd be no incentive to change the roads as there'd be resistance from people like me! If we'd done it several decades ago, it would have been feasible, but nowadays it's not a realistic option. What a shame that The World didn't agree right from the outset of the motor car to drive on the same side of the road - but there were issues of national pride at stake, especially Napolean's policy of "if everyone else does it one way, we in France will do it the other way" (I'm paraphrasing, but you get the gist). It's always intrigued me that America chose to drive on the right, given the large number of British people who settled there. No doubt the number of immigrants from other European countries swayed the argument. Which countries still drive on the left? - UK/Ireland, obviously - Channel Islands - Australia - Malta - Gibraltar? Or does that drive on the left like Spain? - Japan (I wonder why) What about former British colonies like India? I *think* they still drive on the left. Anywhere else? In The Bahamas you drive on the left - in a LHD car! Driving on the left comes from Britain but almost all of the cars come from the US (at the closest The Bahamas are only 60 miles off the Florida coast). Buses / coaches / trucks however come from Japan and so are RHD. So being in a nice modern cab (LHD) was a *lot* more scary than travelling in an old 'pack as many people in as possible and drive as fast as possible' but RHD mini-bus. -- regards Stephen |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Neil Williams" wrote in message
... On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 22:51:49 +0100, "tim" wrote: It is still common for a side road to have priority over the main road though. This in itself isn't unknown in British towns. It's normally achieved by way of a mini roundabout. In other words, with very clear advance warning signs and road markings to give the driver on the major road time to slow down to a realistic speed to be able to stop if a car *does* approach from the right. |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"peter" wrote in message
... "Martin Underwood" wrote in message ... "Richard J." wrote in message k... Mrs Redboots wrote: Niklas Karlsson wrote to uk.transport.london on Sun, 9 Jan 2005: That's because the rule was changed some years ago. Before then "priorité à droite" used to apply to roundabouts, giving joining traffic the priority. In the same way that they used "priorité à droite" to give priority to a minor road that joined a major road, forcing traffic travelling at high speed to brake to let a slow-moving tractor pull out in front. I wonder what the French road safety rule-makers were smoking when they came up with that rule! I believe in New Zealand (or maybe Australia) you have to give way to oncoming traffic that it indicating to turn right (ie your left) across your path into a side road. Not here. Peter Sydney Must be NZ then. I knew it was either Oz or NZ. |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"tim" wrote in message
... "Martin Underwood" wrote in message ... "Richard J." wrote in message news ![]() Martin Underwood wrote: "Niklas Karlsson" wrote in message ... Ever noticed those white oval plates with GB on them? Ever thought how their owners managed to drive in LHD countries? The idea that you would have to scrap all RHD cars if we changed the rule of the road is absurd. Yes, there are some problems, and overtaking on narrow single-carriageway roads without a passenger to help you is nasty , but I've never had a problem on a motorway apart from paying at the péage where the kiosk is on the British nearside. If I had to drive in mainland Europe, I'd always hire a car locally and wouldn't contemplate taking my own RHD car over there Having done both, I find that sitting on the wrong side of the car is far harder to get used to than positioning myself on the wrong side of the road. With my RHD car I just have to accept that I can't overtake on single carriageway roads, but fortunately most journeys nowadays are on motorways. Even on a motorway you'd have to take your eyes off the road ahead and look a long way off-axis to see the nearside (left-hand) mirror. To be really sure, an over-the-shoulder check is probably advisable. This requires you to anticipate the need to overtake further in advance to allow a bit of extra distance from the car in front yo cover the time when you're not looking straight ahead. With a LHD car I still position myself on the right half of the carriageway and end up with the bulk of the car: in the kerb, scraping a wall or occupying both lanes of a dual carriageway I found when I drove in America that driving on the other side of the road came a lot more easily than I was expecting: I simply reversed everything in my brain. The main difficulties came with adapting to things that weren't just a lateral inversion but were differences between US and UK signing and road marking: - lack of amber light to warn that traffic lights were about to turn green - appalling direction signing on non-highway (ie single-carriageway roads): maybe I'm too used to the British standard of signposting where at almost every junction the places and distances that can be reached in each direction are shown, so you don't have to look out for small white-on-pale-green road-name signs - lack of a stop or give-way line across the road where my minor road meets a major road; this was especially a problem where the minor road met the major road on a bend: judging where to aim to stop was difficult - coupled with the previous problem, pedestrian crossings consist of two very prominent white lines across the road, between which the pedestrians walk: where a crossing was close to a junction, I tended to stop at the crossing (even when there were no pedestrians) thinking it was the junction stop line - four-way stop junctions: any junction which depends on the time (order) at which cars arrived (instead of their relative position on the road) to determine who has priority is pretty stupid because it's open to two people having different ideas as to who has priority - "disappearing lanes" on highways/freeways: if you're in the right-most lane on the approach to a junction, you need to hop out into the next lane or you'll often find yourself being directed off at the junction - remembering that US speed limits are generally some 10 to 20 mph slower than British ones would be for the same type of road - not being afraid to overtake a car on the "wrong" side because he's decide to travel slowly in a lane that's close to the central reservation It was fun to watch Americans try to negotiate the few roundabouts ("rotaries", "traffic circles") that I encountered: they were bewildered whereas I just said to myself "give way to traffic on my left on the roundabout and think of the mirror image". The roundabout as you go onto Cape Cod sticks in my mind! I got several funny looks from drivers who were in the right-hand lane and indicating right when I overtook them on the roundabout because I was in the left lane going straight ahead... Positioning on the road was a problem on country lanes where there was no kerb stone: occasionally I found that I'd drifted slightly onto the verge. One thing I liked about US driving (certainly in rural Massachussets) was the courtesy of other drivers, both to car drivers and to pedestrians: there was more tendency to drivers on major roads to let ones on minor roads pull out, and several times when I was on foot I had drivers stop to let me cross the road even though I'd only stopped to sightsee and wasn't actually planning to cross! And I liked the idea of temporary speed limits outside schools etc: very slow during arrival/departure times but realistic at all other times, whereas we'd probably have a blanket 30 (or even 20) 24 hours a day. |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mrs Redboots" wrote in message
... There used to be a silly joke going round to the effect that the Republic of Ireland (with whom we do, of course, have a land border) was going to change to left-hand drive, but to make it easier, they would do it in stages: lorries and buses one month, cars and cycles the next..... Mind you, given that they measure distances in kilometres and speed in miles per hour (or is it the other way round?), one does wonder.... Nigeria made the change, and lorries and buses changed first, then cars a few days later. They did however keep cars off the road for those few days.... -- Terry Harper, Web Co-ordinator, The Omnibus Society 75th Anniversary 2004, see http://www.omnibussoc.org/75th.htm E-mail: URL: http://www.terry.harper.btinternet.co.uk/ |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael Bell" wrote in message
... Junction 8 on the M1 was designed "wrong way round" in Mrs Castle's time to test the idea of designing junctions so that they could be changed over to right-hand drive, but the experiment was never repeated. In what way was it designed the wrong way round? Just wrong gradients and curvatures? Anyway, I really think that the world's motor copmpanies should standardise the side that the indicator stick is on. Would it be too hard to design cars such that the pedals, steering wheel and glovebox could be swapped when you drive from one country to another? -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Underwood and "Peter" write:
I believe in New Zealand (or maybe Australia) you have to give way to oncoming traffic that it indicating to turn right (ie your left) across your path into a side road. Not here. Must be NZ then. The silly NZ rule actually is about traffic converging into a side street. The car turning left must yield... er, give way... to the one turning right. -- Mark Brader | "...it's a characteristic ... of organizations that try Toronto | to anticipate every possible failu they easily | come to believe that they *have*..." --Henry Spencer |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 17:36:53 -0000, "Martin Underwood"
wrote: I was told by the guy I was working for that the Irish authorities are reluctant to change the speed limit signs in case people try to claim that the signs still indicate mph and therefore that they are allowed to drive at 80 in a zone that had previously carried a 50 mph = 80 km/hr speed limit ;-) Well, they're doing it now, in 9 days... http://www.gometric.ie/ The new signs will, at least for now, show "km/h" under the figure. Richard. |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Annabel Smyth:
There used to be a silly joke going round to the effect that the Republic of Ireland (with whom we do, of course, have a land border) was going to change to left-hand drive, but to make it easier, they would do it in stages: lorries and buses one month, cars and cycles the next..... You know, when I raised this subject, I thought *I* was making a silly joke. From the amount of reaction, I see now that I was actually right and this change *does* need to be made. (Yes, I'm still joking.) Mind you, given that they measure distances in kilometres and speed in miles per hour (or is it the other way round?), one does wonder.... Martin Underwood: I was told by the guy I was working for that the Irish authorities are reluctant to change the speed limit signs in case people try to claim that the signs still indicate mph ... Of course, it would be too much effort for them to look at Canada and think of putting a "km/h" plate under each sign as it was changed. -- Mark Brader "Fighting off all of the species which you Toronto have insulted would be a full-time mission." "Deja Q", ST:TNG, Richard Danus |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|