Paul Corfield wrote:
I see the weekly public correspondence snapshot that gets discussed at a
director level meeting each week - believe me the public who complain do
not mince their words and the sentiment is not far away from the lyrics.

They must not pick the worst ones to put on the web site he

https://tube.tfl.gov.uk/content/customer_complaints/

Also special thanks to Richard J. without whom I wouldn't have
discovered this. When you said you asked the site to remove it, I
figured I just *had* to see what the fuss was about.
--
Michael Hoffman

Michael Hoffman wrote:
Paul Corfield wrote:
I see the weekly public correspondence snapshot that gets
discussed at a director level meeting each week - believe me the
public who complain do not mince their words and the sentiment is
not far away from the lyrics.

They must not pick the worst ones to put on the web site he

https://tube.tfl.gov.uk/content/customer_complaints/

Also special thanks to Richard J. without whom I wouldn't have
discovered this. When you said you asked the site to remove it, I
figured I just *had* to see what the fuss was about.

Glad I got something right. :-)

Actually, I've withdrawn my request to remove the file, as there's no
evidence here that any LU staff are bothered about (what I regard as)
the offensive abuse directed at them.

--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)

Richard J. wrote:

Actually, I've withdrawn my request to remove the file, as there's no
evidence here that any LU staff are bothered about (what I regard as)
the offensive abuse directed at them.

I can assure you that many of the LU staff who post here will have
suffered worse and for longer than two minutes....
--
Kat

On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 02:08:58 +0000, Kat
wrote:

Richard J. wrote:

Actually, I've withdrawn my request to remove the file, as there's no
evidence here that any LU staff are bothered about (what I regard as)
the offensive abuse directed at them.

I can assure you that many of the LU staff who post here will have
suffered worse and for longer than two minutes....

Precisely.
--
Paul C


Admits to working for London Underground!

On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 01:05:26 +0000, Richard J. wrote:

Michael Hoffman wrote:
Paul Corfield wrote:
I see the weekly public correspondence snapshot that gets
discussed at a director level meeting each week - believe me the
public who complain do not mince their words and the sentiment is
not far away from the lyrics.

They must not pick the worst ones to put on the web site he

https://tube.tfl.gov.uk/content/customer_complaints/

Also special thanks to Richard J. without whom I wouldn't have
discovered this. When you said you asked the site to remove it, I
figured I just *had* to see what the fuss was about.

Glad I got something right. :-)

Actually, I've withdrawn my request to remove the file, as there's no
evidence here that any LU staff are bothered about (what I regard as)
the offensive abuse directed at them.

Did you happen to complain about Springer on the BBC too?

--
Everything I write here is my personal opinion, and should not be taken as fact.

Paul Weaver wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 01:05:26 +0000, Richard J. wrote:

Michael Hoffman wrote:
Paul Corfield wrote:
I see the weekly public correspondence snapshot that gets
discussed at a director level meeting each week - believe me the
public who complain do not mince their words and the sentiment is
not far away from the lyrics.

They must not pick the worst ones to put on the web site he

https://tube.tfl.gov.uk/content/customer_complaints/

Also special thanks to Richard J. without whom I wouldn't have
discovered this. When you said you asked the site to remove it, I
figured I just *had* to see what the fuss was about.

Glad I got something right. :-)

Actually, I've withdrawn my request to remove the file, as there's
no evidence here that any LU staff are bothered about (what I
regard as) the offensive abuse directed at them.

Did you happen to complain about Springer on the BBC too?

No.
--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:16:21 +0000, Richard J. wrote:

Actually, I've withdrawn my request to remove the file, as there's
no evidence here that any LU staff are bothered about (what I
regard as) the offensive abuse directed at them.

Did you happen to complain about Springer on the BBC too?

No.

How strange. On one hand you are a complaining busybody that thinks LU
workers are too timid to complain if they felt it was offensive and
concerned them (not that anyone is forcing them to download), yet on the
other hand you dont complain when tens of thousands of busybodies are
complaining over a program noone forced them to watch.
--
Everything I write here is my personal opinion, and should not be taken as fact.

Paul Weaver wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:16:21 +0000, Richard J. wrote:

Actually, I've withdrawn my request to remove the file, as
there's no evidence here that any LU staff are bothered about
(what I regard as) the offensive abuse directed at them.

Did you happen to complain about Springer on the BBC too?

No.

How strange. On one hand you are a complaining busybody that thinks
LU workers are too timid to complain if they felt it was offensive
and concerned them (not that anyone is forcing them to download),

You may think you know what I think but you are wrong.

yet on the other hand you dont complain when tens of thousands of
busybodies are complaining over a program noone forced them to
watch.

I don't complain about TV programmes that I haven't watched, unlike most
of the people who complained to the BBC before the programme went out.
--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)