Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Jonn Elledge
wrote: "Michael Bell" wrote in message ... Discussion of transport needs in London tends to be based on the idea that the population of London is increasing. It is, but not by as much as Ken Livingstone says. Ken estimates that the population of London will increase by 700 000 by 2016 (I don't know whether you got the impression that I did that it was much more), but the government estimates that the increase will be only 200 000, the rest (2/3!) is Ken's wishful thinking. This is reported here :- http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/st...665779,00.html Interesting... Where's the bit that gives the government estimates? I presume the journalist has got it from the Registrar - General's reports, now called something like "Office of population and census". It would also be interesting to know what the population of London was in the late 50s. Somehow it sounds more impressive to say "London expanding remorselessly" than to say "London struggling to regain the population it had in the late 50s" Part of the cause of that fall was certainly semi-forced overspill to the likes of Milton Keynes and Stevenage, but some of it was probably purely voluntary. Michael Bell -- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crossrail could bankrupt London - says Ken Livingstone | London Transport | |||
Increasing tube capacity Boris Johnson style | London Transport | |||
[OT] High-resolution population density data for London? | London Transport | |||
Commons debate on increasing Crossrail scope | London Transport News | |||
Ken says yes to Crystal Palace tram extension | London Transport |