Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Arquati" a écrit dans le message de ... big SNIP Four-car trains were considered as part of the planning process but were rejected at this stage as the infrastructure works would be prohibitively disruptive. A light railway just isn't designed for the sort of passenger numbers the DLR is now expected to deal with, and I think these 3-car works are designed to plug the gap; the Woolwich extension will make things worse, but hopefully the Jubilee signalling upgrade and car addition will mitigate matters. Crossrail is needed. Just why do you think "the Woolwich extension will make things worse"? Surely, by providing another cross-river route further downstream, that extension of the LCY branch will reduce the curent traffic demand on the Lewisham extension, especially that coming from potential Crossrail passengers. But, needless to say (?), all the station sites on the Woolwich extension must be suitable for expansion to accommodate four-car trains, even if fitted out for only two-car or three-car trains initially. Regards, - Alan (in Brussels) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan (in Brussels) wrote:
"Dave Arquati" a écrit dans le message de ... big SNIP Four-car trains were considered as part of the planning process but were rejected at this stage as the infrastructure works would be prohibitively disruptive. A light railway just isn't designed for the sort of passenger numbers the DLR is now expected to deal with, and I think these 3-car works are designed to plug the gap; the Woolwich extension will make things worse, but hopefully the Jubilee signalling upgrade and car addition will mitigate matters. Crossrail is needed. Just why do you think "the Woolwich extension will make things worse"? Surely, by providing another cross-river route further downstream, that extension of the LCY branch will reduce the curent traffic demand on the Lewisham extension, especially that coming from potential Crossrail passengers. But, needless to say (?), all the station sites on the Woolwich extension must be suitable for expansion to accommodate four-car trains, even if fitted out for only two-car or three-car trains initially. DLR passenger numbers are expected to soar once the Woolwich extension opens; passengers won't just transfer from the Lewisham branch, otherwise there wouldn't be much point building the Woolwich one. The new passengers generated by the Woolwich branch will add to congestion in the central area around Canary Wharf - although many may opt to change to the Jubilee at Canning Town rather than use DLR all the way. All of the viaduct stations can probably be expanded easily; Woolwich Arsenal is underground so that's a bit more risky. However, half of the Woolwich trains will not be running through North Quay or Royal Mint Street junctions - initially half will terminate at Canning Town, but in future they will be extended via West Ham to Stratford International. The signalling has been designed to accommodate 30tph which should provide the necessary capacity for the near future solely using two-car trains. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
City Airport expansion gets go-ahead - incl. new DLR rolling stock | London Transport | |||
DLR City Airport branch | London Transport | |||
DLR City Airport Extension | London Transport | |||
DLR three car trains - City Airport extension | London Transport | |||
White City station on Hammermith & City | London Transport |