Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Newt wrote:
Richard J. wrote: Some of us care deeply about commas, and are trying to work out where this comma is supposed to go, or not go. How about an explanation for the uninitiated? It used to be called Imperial College, and was referred to as IC. The domain was .ic.ac.uk. In the rebranding, it was decided that the new name should be Imperial College London and that the short version should be Imperial. Use of .ic.ac.uk has been proscribed and the ICT Department had fun trying to change all the domain servers to .imperial.ac.uk. However, this creates a false analogy with University College, London, which has a comma in it and is commonly referred to as UCL. On UCL's site www.ucl.ac.uk, they use UCL as the name almost exclusively, even in the history ("175 years ago ... UCL was founded"). Where the name is given in full, I haven't seen one instance on their site where the comma is included. The Imperial branding people specified that it must not be called ICL Quite right too. Some of us have fond memories of a company called ICL, 1968-2002. Thanks very much for the explanation. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard J. wrote:
Dave Newt wrote: Richard J. wrote: Some of us care deeply about commas, and are trying to work out where this comma is supposed to go, or not go. How about an explanation for the uninitiated? It used to be called Imperial College, and was referred to as IC. The domain was .ic.ac.uk. In the rebranding, it was decided that the new name should be Imperial College London and that the short version should be Imperial. Use of .ic.ac.uk has been proscribed and the ICT Department had fun trying to change all the domain servers to .imperial.ac.uk. However, this creates a false analogy with University College, London, which has a comma in it and is commonly referred to as UCL. On UCL's site www.ucl.ac.uk, they use UCL as the name almost exclusively, even in the history ("175 years ago ... UCL was founded"). Where the name is given in full, I haven't seen one instance on their site where the comma is included. You're right - they *must* have changed it. It always was with a comma. The Imperial branding people specified that it must not be called ICL Quite right too. Some of us have fond memories of a company called ICL, 1968-2002. I think it was the "-2002" part of their history that they wanted to distance themselves from! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Dave Newt wrote:
Richard J. wrote: Dave Newt wrote: Richard J. wrote: Some of us care deeply about commas, and are trying to work out where this comma is supposed to go, or not go. How about an explanation for the uninitiated? It used to be called Imperial College, and was referred to as IC. [...] However, this creates a false analogy with University College, London, which has a comma in it and is commonly referred to as UCL. On UCL's site www.ucl.ac.uk, they use UCL as the name almost exclusively, even in the history ("175 years ago ... UCL was founded"). Where the name is given in full, I haven't seen one instance on their site where the comma is included. You're right - they *must* have changed it. It always was with a comma. There was a consultation about the name a few months ago: everyone got a questionnaire with things like "How do refer to UCL to other people inside it?", "Ditto but for people outside?", "What qualities do you associate with the name?" and other inane marketroid nonsense. This was clearly intended to provide input into some brand-sharpening exercise, so perhaps that's when the comma was disappeared. tom -- Restate my assumptions |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:52:17 +0000, Tom Anderson wrote:
"How do refer to UCL to other people inside it?", "Ditto but for people outside?", "What qualities do you associate with the name?" I suppose they'd have been annoyed if you said they were ucly qualities... -- Sometimes you get a different and unexpected result... http://gallery120232.fotopic.net/p9633055.html (50 005 moving off part way through a night exposure in 1978) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard J. wrote:
Quite right too.Â*Â*SomeÂ*ofÂ*usÂ*haveÂ*fondÂ*memoriesÂ*ofÂ*a *companyÂ*calledÂ*ICL, 1968-2002. Didn't they bring out a computer based on the QL, called the "One born every minute" or something? -- Ian Tindale |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian Tindale wrote:
Richard J. wrote: Quite right too. Some of us have fond memories of a company called ICL, 1968-2002. Didn't they bring out a computer based on the QL, called the "One born every minute" or something? The OPD (One Per Desk), vintage 1984. Details at http://web.onetel.com/~rodritab/shed16.htm and other sites. Screen shots at http://www.whimsy.demon.co.uk/opd/ . My memories of the OPD are a bit sub-fond, though. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:07 +0000 (GMT Standard Time), Colin Rosenstiel
wrote: In article , (Richard J.) wrote: The Imperial branding people specified that it must not be called ICL In my day UCCA called it Limp. :-) *laughs* I still dunno what I'm going to do when Southside shuts. They had Old Tom on tap today. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
2005 fares leaflet | London Transport | |||
Carnets do make it into 2005 fares | London Transport | |||
Carnet tickets available in 2005? | London Transport | |||
New 2005 Fares -- Children | London Transport | |||
Blockade of cross London Thameslink services from Saturday 11th September 2004 until 2005 | London Transport |