Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There was a short piece on BBC london news on TV last night about
the new vic line trains and an interview with some bod at (I think) Bombardier. Anyway , turns out that it looks like the prototypes at least will have less seating (quelle surprise) and a lot of what seating is left will be flip up so theres room for all these mythical wheelchair bound passengers we keep hearing about but no one has ever actually seen. Wonderful. So not only will more people have to stand but the ones sitting will have a much less comfortable journey too. Well theres progress for you. Call me a cynic but I can't help thinking that flip up seats are probably a lot cheaper than the real thing though I'm sure this in no way would influence their decision , no no, not at all. B2003 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boltar wrote:
There was a short piece on BBC london news on TV last night about the new vic line trains and an interview with some bod at (I think) Bombardier. Anyway , turns out that it looks like the prototypes at least will have less seating (quelle surprise) and a lot of what seating is left will be flip up so theres room for all these mythical wheelchair bound passengers we keep hearing about but no one has ever actually seen. Wonderful. So not only will more people have to stand but the ones sitting will have a much less comfortable journey too. Well theres progress for you. Call me a cynic but I can't help thinking that flip up seats are probably a lot cheaper than the real thing though I'm sure this in no way would influence their decision , no no, not at all. In Paris, the tip-up seats[1] work very well. They have mostly normal seating, with the tip-ups near the doors, the intention being that when the train is not too busy there is plenty of seating, but that when it gets busy those people will stand up, enabling more people to fit in the carriage. When I say it works very well, I mean that as soon as it gets busy, people immediately stand up and make room for others. As I am sure you know, they have them here on the Northern Line now but they don't work very well at all, as people are just too selfish to let anyone else on once they are on the train and comfortable. (Yet, they will moan if they can't actually get on in the first place.) Same problem with the "priority luggage" areas on Piccadilly trains - people quite rightly stand in them when they can, yet make no attempt to move if someone gets on with a large suitcase, which they are then forced to leave in the middle of the carriage, thus getting in the way of everyone else. [1] and are called "strapontins" which sounds rude and always makes me smile :-) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9 Feb 2005 01:10:42 -0800, "Boltar" wrote:
Call me a cynic but I can't help thinking that flip up seats are probably a lot cheaper than the real thing though I'm sure this in no way would influence their decision , no no, not at all. I suspect that the seating arrangement will be similar to the Northern and Piccadilly line trains, both of which I recall are provided with tip-ups in places. The reduction will be by way of the removal of the transverse seats, which has already happened on other deep-level lines because they aren't wide enough for two average people, and don't have enough legroom for anything other than midgets to sit opposite one another. The longitudinal layout has proven itself on other lines - I doubt that cost has a lot to do with it. The availability of a place to put luggage or a wheelchair without blocking the vestibules (where the train isn't crush loaded of course) seems a sensible idea, and again is helpful in the Northern and Picc trains. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK When replying please use neil at the above domain 'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boltar wrote to uk.transport.london on Wed, 9 Feb 2005:
Call me a cynic but I can't help thinking that flip up seats are probably a lot cheaper than the real thing though I'm sure this in no way would influence their decision , no no, not at all. They've had them on the Paris Metro since the year dot - certainly back in the days of the old Sprague trains. I'm actually surprised they haven't been introduced here until relatively recently. In the Metro, there are great signs telling you not to use them during the rush hours or when the train is busy, so that there is more room for standing passengers. -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 23 January 2005 with new photos |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boltar wrote:
Call me a cynic but I can't help thinking that flip up seats are probably a lot cheaper than the real thing though I'm sure this in no way would influence their decision , no no, not at all. IMO flip up seats are more expensive than normal fixed seats - they move and hence need more maintenance, they require more spares to be kept vs. having all fixed seats, and they require more space - you can't house equipment under them. A cheaper option would be perch seats, which one leans against. The Jubilee 1996 stock has these in place of the Northern 1995's flip ups, which often seem to have broken springs and don't return to upright. Dominic |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Neil Williams wrote: I suspect that the seating arrangement will be similar to the Northern and Piccadilly line trains, both of which I recall are provided with tip-ups in places. From the computer sim images they showed it looked like there'd be a lot more flip ups than on the northern (theres none on the picc). The reduction will be by way of the removal of the transverse seats, which has already happened on other deep-level lines because they aren't wide enough for two average people, and don't have enough legroom for anything other than midgets to sit opposite one another. True , they are narrow , but small people and kids can sit happily on them and larger people choose to stand. With less seats they both get to stand. They also replaced the transverse seats on the C stock and replaced them with longitudinal seats which seemed to be a child sized profile which no one can sit comfortably in. The longitudinal layout has proven itself on other lines - I doubt that cost has a lot to do with it. The availability of a place to put luggage or a wheelchair without blocking the vestibules (where the train isn't crush loaded of course) seems a sensible idea, and again is helpful in the Northern and Picc trains. A lot of people with luggage if they're getting on a crowded train don't bother squeezing all the way through to put their luggage in the correct place , they just dump it where they stand. And despite what the political correctness Taliban would have us believe , sod all wheelchair users ever use the tube. Certainly I don't ever remember seeing more than 2 of them in 10 years of commuting on the system. B2003 |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mrs Redboots wrote:
Boltar wrote to uk.transport.london on Wed, 9 Feb 2005: Call me a cynic but I can't help thinking that flip up seats are probably a lot cheaper than the real thing though I'm sure this in no way would influence their decision , no no, not at all. They've had them on the Paris Metro since the year dot - certainly back in the days of the old Sprague trains. I'm actually surprised they haven't been introduced here until relatively recently. In the Metro, there are great signs telling you not to use them during the rush hours or when the train is busy and, importantly, people *do*!!! They also let people off first before getting on; when on, stand aside to let people off; sometimes even step off temporarily to let people off! And they do all this with no announcements! How different to here, where the same old mantra is repeated 6 times at almost every station, and is routinely ignored. Contrary to stereotype, the Parisian commuter is a much more considerate being than the London one. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() A lot of people with luggage if they're getting on a crowded train don't bother squeezing all the way through to put their luggage in the correct place , they just dump it where they stand. And despite what the political correctness Taliban would have us believe , sod all wheelchair users ever use the tube. Certainly I don't ever remember seeing more than 2 of them in 10 years of commuting on the system. There are very few wheelchair users on the tube, but I have certainly seen more than that, as I am on the Jubilee line extension, about the only part of the tube that is actually wheelchair accessible. There aren't any accessible Victoria line stations now, so I would be amazed if any use it at present. But there are plans for several major station reconstructions which will include disabled access, some of which will be on the Victoria line, so the space might be more useful in the future that it would be now, and remember that the trains won't be delivered for several years yet and should last a generation, so in the lifetime of the trains I would think many more parts of the tube will be accessible. Personally I fully support the improvements in accessibility, wherever it is economic to do so; while I am able bodied, some of the lifts on the Jubilee line are well-used by many for whom steps are a pain without actually being disabled (the elderly, those with heavy luggage or children in prams etc.) I have even had to queue for the lifts at Green Park when going to and from Heathrow with a suitcase due to the number of people changing trains with luggage! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Boltar wrote: political correctness Taliban Ooh, triple bonus points, thanks! -- Larry Lard Replies to group please |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony Wilson wrote to uk.transport.london on Wed, 9 Feb 2005:
There aren't any accessible Victoria line stations now, so I would be amazed if any use it at present. They are building lifts at Brixton, although I don't know which other stations will be accessible *from* there for wheelchair users. Personally I fully support the improvements in accessibility, wherever it is economic to do so; while I am able bodied, some of the lifts on the Jubilee line are well-used by many for whom steps are a pain without actually being disabled (the elderly, those with heavy luggage or children in prams etc.) I have even had to queue for the lifts at Green Park when going to and from Heathrow with a suitcase due to the number of people changing trains with luggage! The lifts on the DLR (at least, at East India which I was using regularly at one stage), were marked with both a wheelchair and a pushchair icon. -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 23 January 2005 with new photos |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pa on new victoria line trains | London Transport | |||
Seats on London Overground and the new Victoria Line trains | London Transport | |||
New victoria line trains | London Transport | |||
New Victoria Line Trains | London Transport | |||
More details on new victoria line trains...... | London Transport |