Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Aidan Stanger" wrote in message ... Linking it to the topic (but not the subject), Next to Bromley South station there's a Waitrose (which sometimes had BOGOF minced beef) that looks like its carpark is partly built on either old railway land or land that the railway's eventually planned to expand into. Which is it? I think it was probably a goods yard many years ago, but there's been no railway use of that land for at least the last 40 years. Peter |
#62
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Ray wrote to uk.transport.london on Sun, 13 Feb 2005:
Strangely (to me), in Paris, there is in effect a supplement charged for the buses. One ticket will take you right across the city on the Metro, but 3 tickets may be needed for the same distance on a bus. I have often wondered why this is. I know that was the case in the 1970s when I lived there, but I *thought* - and I could easily be mistaken - that now it was one ticket per zone, same as the metro? I've just checked - it is one ticket now, except on the Balabus and four other lines, the 221, 297, 299, 350 & 351. Don't know where those run, but the 3-figure numbers tend to be in the suburbs. And you can't change bus without another ticket. -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 23 January 2005 with new photos |
#63
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:41:32 +0000, John Ray
wrote: Ian Jelf wrote: Although I have some sympathy with such a system, London is so large and complex (and busy), that charging a supplement for Underground travel (which is effectively what happens when compared to buses) is I feel justified in return for the faster journey. (Hamburg has - or had - something similar for its express buses). Paris also has no bus-metro transfer beyond the sort of passes available in London. Strangely (to me), in Paris, there is in effect a supplement charged for the buses. One ticket will take you right across the city on the Metro, but 3 tickets may be needed for the same distance on a bus. I have often wondered why this is. This is entirely a guess but I doubt that RATP want to encourage people to use buses too much. This is simply because the network is nowhere near as comprehensive as that in London and also it has fairly restrictive operating hours. Given that a lot of people still live close in to the centre and that Paris retains its local centres there is less need for a comprehensive bus service. In recent years there has been some improvement / expansion of the buses but it is still the poor relation to the rail network. It gets even worse once you leave the Paris city area and get to the suburbs. I stay with friends to the North West of Paris and there is a good RER and SNCF service but the only RATP bus is once an hour and the local operator does not provide anything even resembling a bus service when compared to the sheer excess of service we have in London for the same sort of area. As an example I catch a SNCF local service from Gare du Nord and then have to connect one stop by RER. Ideally I'd be able to get a local bus from the SNCF station which is barely 10 mins by car from my friends place. However there is NO local bus service between the two places and I've only ever seen one bus (running off service) at about 8pm. It's worse than some parts of deregulated Britain! -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#64
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#65
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:40:50 +0000 (UTC), David Jackman
wrote: Why couldn't the existing system remain for Cash fares but a distance based one applied for Pre-pay? It probably could - but is it really worth it? That said, it could make certain revenue enforcement easier - you could just say that the price from A to B was X, regardless of which route you took. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK When replying please use neil at the above domain 'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read. |
#66
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Aidan Stanger" wrote in message ... The question is how much group discount should be provided to attract families - or should it stick to what it's best at. And the answer really depends on the time of day - when the trains are full, attracting families is probably best avoided, but when there is spare capacity, it's often worth putting on special offers in order to attract more passengers. TfL certainly try to attract families. An off-peak ODTC (Zones 1-6) costs GBP6.00. If you take a child with you, you qualify for a Family Travelcard for GBP4.00 plus GBP0.80 for the child. On Saturdays and Sundays the Family Travelcard is even better value - the child still needs a ticket, but the child ticket is free. Peter |
#67
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:42:23 +0000 (UTC), Stephen Osborn
wrote: But single tickets (i.e. A to B and back either one day or seasonal) versus travelcards is what this discussion is about. Oh, true. The thing I was referring to was the rather annoying situation on the National Rail system where it's often cheaper to split tickets on a simple, point-to-point single or return journey, just because the fares system is such a mess. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK When replying please use neil at the above domain 'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read. |
#68
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Corfield writes:
I acknowledged this point but if you have any memory of the Tube prior to zonal fares and I just about do then the old set up had arrays of free standing single fare machine with huge signs above them saying which stations for that fare. If you were very lucky you had a machine with 10 buttons on it. Also, IIRC, there were some larger machines which had a button for every LUL station. |
#69
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Aidan Stanger" wrote in message
... The question is how much group discount should be provided to attract families - or should it stick to what it's best at. And the answer really depends on the time of day - when the trains are full, attracting families is probably best avoided, but when there is spare capacity, it's often worth putting on special offers in order to attract more passengers. TfL certainly try to attract families. An off-peak ODTC (Zones 1-6) costs GBP6.00. If you take a child with you, you qualify for a Family Travelcard for GBP4.00 plus GBP0.80 for the child. On Saturdays and Sundays the Family Travelcard is even better value - the child still needs a ticket, but the child ticket is free. (reposted, as it didn't appear at this end first time) Peter |
#70
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:13:19 +0000, Graham Murray
wrote: Paul Corfield writes: I acknowledged this point but if you have any memory of the Tube prior to zonal fares and I just about do then the old set up had arrays of free standing single fare machine with huge signs above them saying which stations for that fare. If you were very lucky you had a machine with 10 buttons on it. Also, IIRC, there were some larger machines which had a button for every LUL station. Well yes but they were part of the Underground Ticketing System equipment. I was referring to the old stand alone machines in the middle of ticket halls which printed the yellow oxide tickets. My first "proper" job with LU involved creating and testing the ticket machine data. As part of that I had to stand at a machine and press every ticket combination on the multi fare machines, read out the fare to the colleague who checked that it was right. You could say I've bought a ticket from every station to every other one on the Underground! You got rather sore fingers and arms ;-) -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Zones 1, 2 and 3 or just 2 and 3 and PAYG | London Transport | |||
Annual Season Ticket : Colchester - London All Zones | London Transport | |||
Gold Card season ticket and LT (was Annual vs monthly season tickets) | London Transport | |||
Season tickets on oyster, refund vouchers, prepay balance and refunds | London Transport |