Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mrs Redboots wrote:
John Ray wrote to uk.transport.london on Sun, 13 Feb 2005: Strangely (to me), in Paris, there is in effect a supplement charged for the buses. One ticket will take you right across the city on the Metro, but 3 tickets may be needed for the same distance on a bus. I have often wondered why this is. I know that was the case in the 1970s when I lived there, but I *thought* - and I could easily be mistaken - that now it was one ticket per zone, same as the metro? I've just checked - it is one ticket now, except on the Balabus and four other lines, the 221, 297, 299, 350 & 351. Don't know where those run, but the 3-figure numbers tend to be in the suburbs. And you can't change bus without another ticket. Thank you for that. I haven't used a bus in Paris for many years, because of the (then) ticketing regime, so I hadn't noticed the change. On my next visit I will try to wean myself away from the Metro. -- John Ray |
#82
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Arquati wrote:
[...] I fail to see how an uncomplicated system which people can actually understand is a problem. Zones are essentially distance-based, but take into account a need to be flexible with travel plans, the fact that central London is much busier than outer London, and keep people happy when they can easily understand what fare they will pay. How would Travelcards - the most useful and flexible ticket - work under a point-to-point system? West Yorkshire and the West Midlands have the best of both worlds. There's a zone map for the purposes of offering zonal travelcards, but there's also a point-to-point system for season tickets and walk-on fares. -- PGP key ID E85DC776 - finger for full key |
#83
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rupert Candy wrote to uk.transport.london on Sun, 13 Feb 2005:
Mrs Redboots wrote: And you can't see out of a single-decker. But sat in the front seat upstairs on a double-decker (and since those are just by the stairs, no problem with headroom), and in no hurry, it's a joy! Annabel - it must have been a while since you've been on the 3 for you to describe a long journey on it as "a joy"... (On the other hand, IMHO the 137 is a very pleasant way to travel from this corner of London to Oxford St!) Yes, I don't like the 3 very much, you are quite right. On the other hand, it does go through some nice parts of London before crossing the river! -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 23 January 2005 with new photos |
#84
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Ray wrote to uk.transport.london on Mon, 14 Feb 2005:
Mrs Redboots wrote: I've just checked - it is one ticket now, except on the Balabus and four other lines, the 221, 297, 299, 350 & 351. Don't know where those run, but the 3-figure numbers tend to be in the suburbs. And you can't change bus without another ticket. Thank you for that. I haven't used a bus in Paris for many years, because of the (then) ticketing regime, so I hadn't noticed the change. On my next visit I will try to wean myself away from the Metro. If you read French, there's a very interesting history of the Paris bus network on http://tinyurl.com/3rhfv which says, among other things, that the 1970s were really the nadir of the network, and that they have done a great deal to improve things since then. -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 23 January 2005 with new photos |
#85
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Liney wrote:
"Barry Salter" wrote in message ... Compare this to TfL's fares, where the vast majority of the fares structure is printed in a 16 page booklet (about the only thing that's not in there being staff privilege tickets and Railcard discounted Travelcards). They don't list the reduced prices for some short boundary-crossing journeys either. I've also never seen them published online by TfL either. You have to go to the station involved to find them out, or look in the ATOC's National Fares Manual. That these reduced fares exist does show that London Underground realise that a strict zonal pricing system can lead to "unfair" fares. I only thought these applied to season tickets until I tried it out. The short hops allowed are quite reasonable - for example, Gloucester Road to Holland Park warrants a £1.70 fare, as does High Street Kensington to Fulham Broadway. I presume they apply if you travel from a station adjacent to a boundary to a station one removed from a boundary, but that's just based on those examples. I imagine it only works for hops across the Z1 boundary too, as other short hop fares will be £1.10 anyway. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#86
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neil Williams wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:39:59 -0000, "Solar Penguin" wrote: And why is being individually priced a bad thing? Look at the example I gave elsewhere in the thread: the Northern Line ticket from Morden to Waterloo costs the same as the ticket from Morden going all the way to Mill Hill East. Passangers to Waterloo are paying for around twice as much journey than they actually use. An individually priced Morden-Waterloo ticket would solve this problem. As would a fairly simple change to the zonal fares system, which would be to count the number of zone boundaries crossed, rather than to count which zones are entered. I'm sure I've seen this kind of ticketing elsewhere. There are plenty of point-to-point systems which "max out" like this one, as well - I believe Deutsche Bahn's semi-kilometric InterCity fares system has a maximum fare. Counting zone boundaries crossed is useless if you want to discourage people from entering or using a particularly busy part of the network if they don't need to. Under that system, a journey from Shadwell to New Cross would be priced the same as one from King's Cross to Victoria. All of which is a moot point, anyway. Given that a public transport system has been planned and is being operated based on average traffic etc, there is no direct cost that can be attributed to one person's usage of the system, because whether that one person was there or not the system would operate anyway, and the fuel cost attributed to one passenger is tiny enough to be irrelevant. Whatever means is used to define the fares is therefore a model. That's true, but it doesn't stop the fares system from being used to restrain demand. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#87
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rupert Candy wrote:
Dave Arquati wrote: [snip useful and clear analysis] All that's left are day return journeys to London terminals, which would unfortunately be more expensive under this system. Single would be £2.50 from a Zone 4 station, return would be £4.70 (capped to the price of a Travelcard). If we take Crystal Palace as an example, a single to Victoria would be £3.10 now, or a return would be £3.60. On the plus side, you get free bus and tube travel "thrown in". I guess it all depends what proportion of day-returners arriving at London terminals don't use any other transport during the day. However, as a YP railcard holder I can get a CDR from West Dulwich to Victoria for around £2. Since railcards don't have any effect on zonal fares, a comparable journey via bus 3 and Brixton will end up costing over twice this. I wonder if they've thought about what will happen to railcards if they go zonal? I have wondered about the railcard issue, being a user myself (but usually only for journeys between London and the "outside" :-) ). With the last fares change, through tickets from NR to Tube stations were fully discounted (before, only the NR portion was discounted), and it would be odd to abandon a discount again. A possible solution in our case might be for TfL to combine their Student discount scheme with the YP Railcard scheme, with Student-registered Oysters incurring the YP discounts whereever necessary. Complicated though! Given that return fares between the termini and South London stations would rise considerably, TfL may have to offer some compromise to satisfy the travelling public. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#88
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Arquati" wrote in message ... I have wondered about the railcard issue, being a user myself (but usually only for journeys between London and the "outside" :-) ). With the last fares change, through tickets from NR to Tube stations were fully discounted (before, only the NR portion was discounted), and it would be odd to abandon a discount again. A Zones 1-6 ODTC, normally GBP6.00, is discounted to GBP4.80 using a Gold Card. Presumably this applies to a ticket bought for a travelling companion, or for a ticket bought by the holder of a Gold Card which is not a Travelcard, e.g. one valid for a journey outside London, such as Newhaven Harbour to Town. Does this apply to other railcards - obviously a Network Card would come up against the GBP10 minimum, except at weekends? Apparently there is no discount on a ODTC with validity less than all zones. Peter |
#89
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 01:39:53 +0000, John Ray
wrote: Mrs Redboots wrote: John Ray wrote to uk.transport.london on Sun, 13 Feb 2005: Strangely (to me), in Paris, there is in effect a supplement charged for the buses. One ticket will take you right across the city on the Metro, but 3 tickets may be needed for the same distance on a bus. I have often wondered why this is. I know that was the case in the 1970s when I lived there, but I *thought* - and I could easily be mistaken - that now it was one ticket per zone, same as the metro? I've just checked - it is one ticket now, except on the Balabus and four other lines, the 221, 297, 299, 350 & 351. Don't know where those run, but the 3-figure numbers tend to be in the suburbs. And you can't change bus without another ticket. Thank you for that. I haven't used a bus in Paris for many years, because of the (then) ticketing regime, so I hadn't noticed the change. On my next visit I will try to wean myself away from the Metro. Or simply purchase a Mobilis ticket which is their version of a One Day Travelcard. You get a form of "ID" card which you keep and then simply buy a magnetic ticket as necessary. You then date it and write on the ID card number. It is then valid for travel within the zones purchases. Admittedly it is a sort of premium product but it is very handy if you need to use SNCF or RER services beyond the central area. It also opens up the bus network for you to use. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#90
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Corfield wrote:
Or simply purchase a Mobilis ticket which is their version of a One Day Travelcard. You get a form of "ID" card which you keep and then simply buy a magnetic ticket as necessary. You then date it and write on the ID card number. I used one of those a few years ago, but not on buses. It was good value for the trips I made on the day, and I was surprised that it isn't publicised to tourists (or not noticeably). They plug the Paris Visite pass in the tourist literature, but not Mobilis. -- John Ray |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Zones 1, 2 and 3 or just 2 and 3 and PAYG | London Transport | |||
Annual Season Ticket : Colchester - London All Zones | London Transport | |||
Gold Card season ticket and LT (was Annual vs monthly season tickets) | London Transport | |||
Season tickets on oyster, refund vouchers, prepay balance and refunds | London Transport |