WHO'S YER DADDY?!! wrote:
I'm loving this one: the sallow, onion-faced c*nt's drunk on power,
not to
mention white wine when this happened:


http://today.reuters.co.uk/News/news...storyID=2005-0
2-11T132847Z_01_HOP148445_RTRUKOC_0_BRITAIN-LIVINGSTONE.xml

Please let me know if you hear anything about it on the BBC: I saw
nothing
on BBC TV London News (Ken Is Buddha to them of course)

ROBBIE

Since everything Ken does is shot down by the evening standard (such as
the congestion charge, tube and bus prices, etc.) he probably feels
that someone in the Standard has a grudge against him. The
concentration camps were set up because Hitler had a grudge against
Jewish people. Lets compare an Evening Standard reporter to a
Concentration camp guard. Now do you see why he said it?

Probably a bit harsh but when the newspaper with the monopoly on
evening reading in London is always against anything you do you must be
able to see how he feels

--
Chris

wrote:

Since everything Ken does is shot down by the evening standard (such as
the congestion charge, tube and bus prices, etc.) he probably feels
that someone in the Standard has a grudge against him. The
concentration camps were set up because Hitler had a grudge against
Jewish people. Lets compare an Evening Standard reporter to a
Concentration camp guard. Now do you see why he said it?

Poor judgment? Ignorance? Stupidity? Self-importance? Not being able to
tell the difference between the organized slaughter of millions and some
hatchet jobs in a newspaper? You tell me.

Probably a bit harsh but when the newspaper with the monopoly on
evening reading in London is always against anything you do you must be
able to see how he feels

He is a public official, and I expect more. Even from Ken.
--
Michael Hoffman

Michael Hoffman wrote to uk.transport.london on Sun, 13 Feb 2005:

wrote:

Since everything Ken does is shot down by the evening standard (such as
the congestion charge, tube and bus prices, etc.) he probably feels
that someone in the Standard has a grudge against him. The
concentration camps were set up because Hitler had a grudge against
Jewish people. Lets compare an Evening Standard reporter to a
Concentration camp guard. Now do you see why he said it?

Poor judgment? Ignorance? Stupidity? Self-importance? Not being able to
tell the difference between the organized slaughter of millions and some
hatchet jobs in a newspaper? You tell me.

Probably a little hammered, or he would have guarded his tongue.

Probably a bit harsh but when the newspaper with the monopoly on
evening reading in London is always against anything you do you must be
able to see how he feels

He is a public official, and I expect more. Even from Ken.

All goes to show that people in public life ought not to drink.
--
"Mrs Redboots"
http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/
Website updated 23 January 2005 with new photos

Michael Hoffman wrote:
wrote:

Since everything Ken does is shot down by the evening standard
(such as
the congestion charge, tube and bus prices, etc.) he probably
feels
that someone in the Standard has a grudge against him. The
concentration camps were set up because Hitler had a grudge against
Jewish people. Lets compare an Evening Standard reporter to a
Concentration camp guard. Now do you see why he said it?

Poor judgment? Ignorance? Stupidity? Self-importance? Not being able
to
tell the difference between the organized slaughter of millions and
some
hatchet jobs in a newspaper? You tell me.

But NOT racist

On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:03:44 +0000, Michael Hoffman wrote:

He is a public official, and I expect more. Even from Ken.

Perhaps he is thinking about the fact that the evening standards sister
paper, the Daily Mail, supported the Fascists in the 30's and wrote
articles supporting some of Hitler's policies. Back to modern day the
whole group of companies have a history of constant attacks on minority
groups.

Comparing the employee of such a paper to one of Hitlers guards seems quite
apt.

Steve

"Steve Peake" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:03:44 +0000, Michael Hoffman wrote:

He is a public official, and I expect more. Even from Ken.

Perhaps he is thinking about the fact that the evening standards sister
paper, the Daily Mail, supported the Fascists in the 30's and wrote
articles supporting some of Hitler's policies. Back to modern day the
whole group of companies have a history of constant attacks on minority
groups.

Comparing the employee of such a paper to one of Hitlers guards seems
quite
apt.

Steve

Another 17-year-old! Yes The Daily Mail was pro-fascist in the 30s as was
its famous foreign correspondent in Ethiopia, the greatest English Novelist
of the 20th century Evelyn Waugh. Most people were up for appeasing Adolf
until May 1940 when glorious Winston Churchill finally disabused these
******s--including the King-- of their appeasing ways. You, like
Livingstone, probably clam up when you think about how a tory had the vision
to fight fascism to the end. However, back, as you say, to modern day the
Mail does *not* have a history of 'constant attacks' on minority groups; it
has a policy of attacking certain *attitudes* to minority groups.

ROBBIE

CAMILLE SAINT SAENS wrote:
"Steve Peake" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:03:44 +0000, Michael Hoffman wrote:

He is a public official, and I expect more. Even from Ken.

Perhaps he is thinking about the fact that the evening standards
sister paper, the Daily Mail, supported the Fascists in the 30's and
wrote articles supporting some of Hitler's policies. Back to modern
day the whole group of companies have a history of constant attacks
on minority groups.

Comparing the employee of such a paper to one of Hitlers guards
seems quite apt.

Steve

Another 17-year-old! Yes The Daily Mail was pro-fascist in the 30s as
was its famous foreign correspondent in Ethiopia, the greatest
English Novelist of the 20th century Evelyn Waugh. Most people were
up for appeasing Adolf until May 1940 when glorious Winston Churchill
finally disabused these ******s--including the King-- of their
appeasing ways. You, like Livingstone, probably clam up when you
think about how a tory had the vision to fight fascism to the end.
However, back, as you say, to modern day the Mail does *not* have a
history of 'constant attacks' on minority groups; it has a policy of
attacking certain *attitudes* to minority groups.


Churchill had also been a Liberal.

In message , CAMILLE SAINT SAENS
writes
However, back, as you say, to modern day the Mail does *not* have a
history of 'constant attacks' on minority groups; it has a policy of
attacking certain *attitudes* to minority groups.
Is there a difference?
--
Clive.

Steve Peake wrote in message ...

"Perhaps he is thinking about the fact that the evening standards
sister
paper, the Daily Mail, supported the Fascists in the 30's and wrote
articles supporting some of Hitler's policies. Back to modern day the
whole group of companies have a history of constant attacks on
minority
groups.

Comparing the employee of such a paper to one of Hitlers guards seems
quite
apt."

What a stupid remark! At least when Livingstone made the concentration
camp guard remark he had the excuse of being drunk. Whats your excuse?

"Michael Hoffman" wrote in message
...
wrote:

Since everything Ken does is shot down by the evening standard (such as
the congestion charge, tube and bus prices, etc.) he probably feels
that someone in the Standard has a grudge against him. The
concentration camps were set up because Hitler had a grudge against
Jewish people. Lets compare an Evening Standard reporter to a
Concentration camp guard. Now do you see why he said it?

Poor judgment? Ignorance? Stupidity? Self-importance? Not being able to
tell the difference between the organized slaughter of millions and some
hatchet jobs in a newspaper? You tell me.

Probably a bit harsh but when the newspaper with the monopoly on
evening reading in London is always against anything you do you must be
able to see how he feels

I'm not defending anything or anyone here, but there's a massive difference
between a cog and the machine it goes in. Unless he compared that person to
Hitler, and not a guard, then your analogy is somewhat erroneous.

He is a public official, and I expect more. Even from Ken.
--
Michael Hoffman