Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rich Mallard" wrote in message
... snip my own comments Following up on that somewhat negative post, instead of building a new class of train, I think with hindsight it would have been better to have: - Completed the 12-car Networker project in the Kent Link area - Lengthened all Charing Cross/Cannon St Kent Link peak trains by two carriages or more, giving 10 or 12 car formations on virtually all services. - Refurbished and modified the Networkers to allow for more room for standing by doorways - Placed a follow-on order for more 375/9 units to be used on Networker routes, keeping them targeted at Gillingham/Gravesend/Sevenoaks trains when possible. OK, so that's not going to happen now, so to resolve the current situation I suggest: - Removal of the tip-up seats and proper seating installed - An urgent rethink on the seating with new deeper upholstery supplied (and not in a dreary grey fabric) Rich |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rich Mallard" wrote in
: "Rich Mallard" wrote in message ... snip my own comments Following up on that somewhat negative post, instead of building a new class of train, I think with hindsight it would have been better to have: - Completed the 12-car Networker project in the Kent Link area - Lengthened all Charing Cross/Cannon St Kent Link peak trains by two carriages or more, giving 10 or 12 car formations on virtually all services. - Refurbished and modified the Networkers to allow for more room for standing by doorways - Placed a follow-on order for more 375/9 units to be used on Networker routes, keeping them targeted at Gillingham/Gravesend/Sevenoaks trains when possible. OK, so that's not going to happen now, so to resolve the current situation I suggest: - Removal of the tip-up seats and proper seating installed - An urgent rethink on the seating with new deeper upholstery supplied (and not in a dreary grey fabric) Rich Sounds sensible to me. But, if new trains had to be built, why on earth build them with only 2 sets of doors per side ?! (The old standard DB S Bahn EMU - class 420 - has 4 sets on each side of a 20.8m vehicle, its replacement, the articulated class 423, 3 sets on a 15.5m vehicle) David |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Jackman wrote: The old standard DB S Bahn EMU - class 420 - has 4 sets on each side of a 20.8m vehicle, its replacement, the articulated class 423, 3 sets on a 15.5m vehicle And exactly no overall change to the unit - a 3 car 420 is 67400 mm long with 12 door pairs per unit - and 423 are 4 car artic also 67400 mm long also with 12 door pairs per unit. I'd like to have seen 376s built like DB 423s. Far too radical for UK national railways (or too German for Connex as was) and far too innovative for uk.railway to ever accept such a device -- Nick |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Northern Line Disappointment, Sat 2 December | London Transport | |||
Class 376 deployment questions | London Transport | |||
Class 376 train problems - South Eastern Trains | London Transport | |||
376 diagrams on SET website | London Transport | |||
LUL set to close Met line | London Transport |