Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Clive D. W. Feather wrote: In article , Dave Arquati writes I actually had a brief look today at the bill itself when I should have been doing other things, and was interested to note that although the Railways Act 1993 prohibits public-sector operators from being franchisees (how did SET get around that?), the Crossrail Bill (Section 34) states that that does not apply in this case, paving the way (theoretically) for a public-sector operator run Crossrail services. Parliament cannot bind its successors: *any* Act can override any provision of previous legislation. So it will all be perfectly legal. ....except the European Communities Act 1972, if constitutional theorists are to be believed, but this isn't really the right newsgroup for a discussion of Diceyan theory... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
DofT Deliberately Witholding Documents Heathrow Expansion? | London Transport | |||
Crossrail - House of Commons Committee report published today | London Transport | |||
"The Bill" on the tube | London Transport | |||
TfL bill | London Transport | |||
Apology if Mad Bill Pal m er has been annoying members of uk.local.birmingham? | London Transport |