Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:41:45 +0000, Dave Arquati wrote:
Paul Corfield wrote: On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:29:34 +0000, Dave Arquati wrote: The card will store 10 journeys worth of information. Therefore it is updated each time there is a transaction such as an entry at a gate or tapping your card on a bus reader. Both the card and reading device exchange information and validity checks are made. There is a transaction written to the card and also one generated in the reading / checking device. As the conductor machine can deduct cash as well as sell a paper ticket then it MUST record all transactions - how else is the money accounted for? I realise the conductor's machine must record the transactions, but the station ticket machine also showed Ian's bus journey straight away. Does it only read the information from the card, or does it also synchronise with the central database - or is that left to the update from the conductor's machine only? As I understand it the station machine only reads the card - hence why only 10 journeys can be displayed. If the central system had to be interrogated every time then the system traffic would be huge for little purpose. Transactions would take longer at ticket machines as well. The central system can only synchronise with the card overnight because it is entirely possible for some of the transactions that need to reach the central system are still on a vehicle somewhere. I also presume some new software had to be downloaded into every single Oyster reader for the introduction of capping - I wonder whether this has been done in advance with it only becoming "switched on" tomorrow? Again I'm not totally sure how it works on the bus side of things but certainly the LUL system allows advance loading and then timed activation. Advance downloading would be the most sensible thing to do or else you end having to physically attend to each ETM and thus risk reducing bus availability. The bus operators hate things like that as it puts them at risk of penalties for late or cancelled journeys. It's also a very expensive way of undertaking modifications. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Photography on London Underground - yes, it's allowed | London Transport | |||
Yes, it's Another Arcane Oyster Question! | London Transport | |||
London train companies say yes to Oyster! | London Transport | |||
Ken says yes to Crystal Palace tram extension | London Transport | |||
Another Oyster Question | London Transport |