Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 21 Apr 2005, PhilD wrote:
purple pete wrote: Bit of a shame if you wanted Wembley Park tho. At a wild guess, I'd say that's on http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tube/travelinfo/eta/jubilee-station-view.asp?StationCode=WEP. The station name appears as a separate bit on the end of the URL (sorry, don't know the technical term), I'd call that a query parameter, although i can't find a citation for that in the standards anywhere just now. so you can confuse people if you want to, like this: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tube/travelinfo/eta/jubilee-station-view.asp?StationCode=STA&StationName=Wagga%20Wagga This is what we call a Widdecombe, after: http://www.political.co.uk/annwiddec...on=Wagga+Wagga See: http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=sit...he%2 0week%22 For many, many more. I notice that the station codes are gratuitously incompatible with the ones NR use for their live departure boards - STR is Stratford or Stranraer, depending on who you ask. They're also different to LU's own signal box codes; AIUI, those don't cover every station, though, so perhaps not surprising. tom -- 20 Minutes into the Future |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:31:32 +0100, Tom Anderson wrote:
I notice that the station codes are gratuitously incompatible with the ones NR use and? -- http://gallery120232.fotopic.net/p13277513.html (Unexpected power: 86 032 & 87 034 on steel empties at Warrington, 1985) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Chris Tolley wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:31:32 +0100, Tom Anderson wrote: I notice that the station codes are gratuitously incompatible with the ones NR use and? Why? tom -- I'm angry, but not Milk and Cheese angry. -- Mike Froggatt |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:45:43 +0100, Tom Anderson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Chris Tolley wrote: On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:31:32 +0100, Tom Anderson wrote: I notice that the station codes are gratuitously incompatible with the ones NR use and? Why? Because it doesn't make any sense to a systems analyst that company X should design its computer systems on the basis of a coding scheme that is designed by company Y and might be changed by Company Y at any time without warning. Suppose NR starts a new scheme using 4-letter codes... Many US companies discovered this to their cost a few years ago when they had been using the Social Security number as the unique identifier in their personnel systems, and the US Government changed its format. -- http://gallery120232.fotopic.net/p9683728.html (Red stripe liveried class 127 parcels dmu 55979 at New Street in 1988) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More Tube lines now have live ETA boards | London Transport | |||
Anyone have an ETA on the picc re-opening south of arnos grove? | London Transport | |||
LU ETA | London Transport | |||
Live ETA on Bakerloo Line | London Transport |