Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Fairthorne wrote: I agree. DLR extension(s) south of Lewisham would relieve overcrowding at Lewisham, which is a rail bottleneck. There must be a big potential demand from wharf workers living in the southeast. A Catford Bridge extension would allow all Hayes trains to bypass Lewisham. A Bromley North extension would allow all Dartford loop line trains (via Sidcup) to bypass Lewisham, and also provide a way to reach the wharf from the main Orpington and Sevenoaks line. Surely the problem with this is that if the DLR wants to take over suburban services it'll need suburban type trains , not the uncomfortable modified trams it uses at the moment. Riding a few miles it one of those things with its hard seats and swinging from side to side is one thing, riding all the way in from bromley would be entirely another. B2003 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
8.5% cut in central govt grant to TfL; suburban West Anglia trainsto be devolved to TfL control | London Transport | |||
New Roads, New Traffic Lights, New Post Code | London Transport | |||
Suburban travel - the reality | London Transport | |||
Paintings of suburban London | London Transport | |||
LT card validity on suburban rail | London Transport |