Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I heard yesterday that some kind of agreement had just been reached
about re-opening the Epping-Ongar line, and that there was some rolling stock movement (Woodford to Ongar?) in relation to this. Does anyone know anything further about this? Neither EOR nor ORPS have anything about this on their websites... Christopher -- Christopher Allen . + . -===""===- c==== . email: * . . \ \____}} WWW: http://ruah.dyndns.org/~cpcallen/ . * @====-' . snail: Studio 10, 319 Archway Rd. London N6 5AA U.K. . * |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is the purpose of the Ongar line? Ongar cannot be a very
important traffic objective. Harlow would pull in far more traffic, if pulling in traffic is the objective! Michael Bell In article , Christopher Allen wrote: I heard yesterday that some kind of agreement had just been reached about re-opening the Epping-Ongar line, and that there was some rolling stock movement (Woodford to Ongar?) in relation to this. Does anyone know anything further about this? Neither EOR nor ORPS have anything about this on their websites... Christopher -- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Bell wrote in message ...
What is the purpose of the Ongar line? Ongar cannot be a very important traffic objective. Harlow would pull in far more traffic, if pulling in traffic is the objective! Michael Bell In article , Christopher Allen wrote: I heard yesterday that some kind of agreement had just been reached about re-opening the Epping-Ongar line, and that there was some rolling stock movement (Woodford to Ongar?) in relation to this. Does anyone know anything further about this? Neither EOR nor ORPS have anything about this on their websites... The local paper http://www.ongarguardian.co.uk ran this last week: Guided busway plan is 'mad' says MP By David Jackman THE possibility of a 'guided busway' along part of the old Epping-Ongar railway line has been branded a "mad" plan by Epping Forest MP Eleanor Laing. Various suggestions about what form the busway would take have been raised with the Guardian, with suggestions including buses running along a concreted Central Line track or a London Docklands Light Railway-type service between Epping and North Weald. But any use of part of the former Epping-Ongar line for such a purpose has been slammed by Mrs Laing. The guided busway is included in the Harlow Options Study report detailing various schemes for growth in and around Harlow. It forms part of a scheme that would see high density housing (up to 2,300 homes) and an employment site at North Weald served by new public transport linking the Central Line at Epping to Harlow town centre via the former North Weald Station. The report states this "would probably" be achieved with the guided busway – a scheme that Mrs Laing says would mean the end of any hope of a full Epping-Ongar line service ever being reinstated. Mrs Laing said: "I think it's a totally pie in the sky, mad plan." She added: "The consultants who made this proposal don't know that we've fought for years to preserve the Epping-Ongar part of the Central Line so that when the time comes, and it looks now as if it will quite soon, that part of the Central Line can be reinstated. "I think it would mean that the Epping-Ongar line would never run again and that's what we have fought to prevent." She added: "Many of the proposals that were put to the stakeholders meeting have not been thought out." Paul White, of Harlow Options Study consultants Atkins Design Environment and Engineering, said: "What we're saying is that we envisage a public transport link of some description which would link the Central Line in Epping and North Weald to Harlow. "Our view is that it would be a dedicated busway, but I know that there are other interested parties that envisaged possibly light rail or heavy rail. Becasue there is the disused part of the Central Line we feel it would make sense to use that and have new infrastructure to Harlow." He said the issue was a matter for much more detailed study before final proposals were drawn up. Commenting on the busway reference in the report, a district council spokesman said: "The suggestions are conceptual at this stage and do not say exactly how such a guided busway would operate. "Transport infrastructure is obviously a major consideration and we would need to see much more detail in the near future." |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "umpston" wrote in message om... Guided busway plan is 'mad' says MP That's promising, then. :-) -- Brian "Stuck down a hole, in the fog, in the middle of the night, with an owl." |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Boltar
writes Guided busways have hardly ever been a success wherever they've been tried. They're a solution designed by a commitee. "We want something that follows a set route but we like busses , I know , lets have a guided bus!". Duh. If you want a guided vehicle have a railway , rail vehicles are more efficient in energy use , can carry FAR more people than any bus and are more reliable. If you want a bus put it on a road , you don't need to build a special road with side barriers (which is all a busway is) for it. I wonder how long after this road .. sorry "busway" is built, it would take for some politician eager to coin in the motorist vote to say "Hey , why don't we let cars use this road too?" But aren't guided bus ways a lot cheaper to build and more reliable? And guided bus ways can become normal buses when they get to the end of the busway? -- CJG |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
CJG writes
But aren't guided bus ways a lot cheaper to build and more reliable? Of course, that's why there are guided busways in every town and city across the nation. -- Dave |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
CJG wrote in message ...
But aren't guided bus ways a lot cheaper to build and more reliable? And guided bus ways can become normal buses when they get to the end of the busway? Depends what you mean by reliable. Sure if you have a pothole in the busway it probably won't bring the whole service to a halt like a broken rail would but on the other hand roads seem to disintegrate far quicker than rail so more maintenance would ultimately be needed and given that by design a bus can't run around the roadworks on a busway since its held in place by the guiderails, any maintenance will force closure of the busway just as on a railway. Busways are pointless. If you want a road just build a road , not some poor facsimile of a railway. B2003 |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Out in Huntingdonshire, a similar process is going on with the former
Huntingdon to Cambridge railway trackbed. The consultation is cosmetic and hilarious inasmuch as the word "bus" is conspicuously absent from the publicity, given Joe/Jill Public's abhorrence of all things bus-like. "High quality transit service" is the preferred euphemism. "Brian Watson" wrote in message ... "umpston" wrote in message om... Guided busway plan is 'mad' says MP That's promising, then. :-) |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Clive D. W. Feather
writes [Personal note: the MGB will *increase* the time it takes the bus to get from my village to Cambridge. If rail services were reinstated on the line I could eliminate 80% of the road part of my commute and replace them with rail, very possibly without altering the total travel time.] While I don't doubt the truth of what you say for a minute, Clive *and* while being deeply sceptical of the advantages of guided buses [1], how does the Cambridgeshire system actually increase a particular journey? [1] The only place I can see guided bus technology being of use is in bus *stations*, to be honest, for ensuring flush boarding and coping with often restricted areas. -- Ian Jelf, MITG, Birmingham, UK Registered "Blue Badge" Tourist Guide for London & the Heart of England http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Ian Jelf
writes While I don't doubt the truth of what you say for a minute, Clive *and* while being deeply sceptical of the advantages of guided buses [1], how does the Cambridgeshire system actually increase a particular journey? Crude map: +---------busway--------+ | | | | C D | | | | +-----A-----+-----B-----+ | | V X V is the village where I live, X is the central Cambridge area. Road A is a 3 lane each way dual carriageway. Road B has a bus lane in the direction that sees congestion. Road C is a narrow country lane. Road D is a busy road where adding a bus lane involves major political risk. In addition, the busway route is about twice the length, or more, of the present route. It seems likely that the presence of the busway will mean that all routes around here are altered, and that the bus to Cambridge will be diverted to it. [1] The only place I can see guided bus technology being of use is in bus *stations*, to be honest, for ensuring flush boarding and coping with often restricted areas. Apparently it works well in Adelaide because of the layout of things: Adelaide: Cambridge: Wide streets in central Narrow congested streets in area, no busway centre Congested suburbs bypassed Congested roads in suburbs by busway Quiet roads in countryside Quiet countryside roads bypassed by busway -- Clive D.W. Feather, writing for himself | Home: Tel: +44 20 8371 1138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Written on my laptop; please observe the Reply-To address |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
News Flash: Epping and Ongar line Easter Opening dates!!! | London Transport | |||
My Epping and Ongar line history website rate it and anyone willing to link me? | London Transport | |||
Epping-Ongar services closer to fruitition | London Transport | |||
Epping-Ongar Railway: Worth a look | London Transport | |||
Epping-Ongar Railway services commence | London Transport |