Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boltar wrote:
The Stratford International extension is not really a Tube/train replacement; it provides a local tram-like (i.e. light rail) service along a corridor which is being targeted for regeneration. Of course it is , its replacing the NLL which has proper trains. I'm not really sure what they're trying to achieve that they couldn;t have achieved far cheaper by simply upping the frequency of NLL train services. Why are those "proper trains" automatically better than DLR trains? By replacing NLL services they're achieving: 1. Increased catchment area with more useful station locations 2. Improved reliability 3. More economically-achieved increased frequency (I'm sure the DLR can run the proposed frequency levels far more efficiently and cheaply than the NLL ever could) 4. More, useful local destinations (Stratford - Canning Town - Beckton and Stratford - Canning Town - Woolwich Arsenal) 5. A useful service between Stratford and North Woolwich maintained once the Canning Town - North Woolwich NLL service closes for Crossrail 6. An economical way of directly serving Stratford International station -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hertfordshire gives TfL useless land to pay for Croxley link | London Transport | |||
DLR Extension To Stratford International | London Transport | |||
DLR or Jubilee line extension to Stratford International - two questions | London Transport |