Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boltar wrote:
London City is and always will be quite a small airport. It currently handles about 1.7 mppa (million passengers per annum). Assuming 50 weeks of 5 days, that's 6800 passengers per day. According to Newham And you don't think thats a lot? Council, Stratford station (all lines) currently handles 52,000 passengers per day. I fail to see the logic behind "clear target" and "rather pointless terminus" Airport = clear target (and obviously someone in tfl has finally noticed or else the DLR wouldn't be going there). Rather pointless terminus = area that is already served by mainline trains to liverpool street, NLL, central line & DLR. I'm trying to think of a reason that a run down tip like stratford would need yet another tube line to go there. So that people can interchange from those lines to reach Canary Wharf and LB Southwark easily? To increase capacity between the east and Canary Wharf? You pointed out yourself that the airport is a traffic target otherwise the DLR wouldn't be going there. However, the reason the DLR is going there and not the Jubilee line is that 6,800 passengers per day does NOT warrant a hugely expensive Underground line. The DLR can cope with 6,800 passengers per day and then some. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hertfordshire gives TfL useless land to pay for Croxley link | London Transport | |||
DLR Extension To Stratford International | London Transport | |||
DLR or Jubilee line extension to Stratford International - two questions | London Transport |