London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 25th 05, 10:32 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2005
Posts: 2
Default Bromley North Line


"Joe" wrote
Yea, that's why I asked. I was looking at the LDBs and all the trains
seem to be shuttles.
What's the reason for running it as a shuttle, anyone know? Congestion
on the MainLine & other services couldnt be cutBack?


The Bromley North branch also suffers from being on the "fast" side of the
layout at Grove Park - a bit like Coulsdon North on the Brighton line, which
closed largely, I think, as a result of the local (slow) and through (fast)
lines being swapped over in the 1980's, leaving it awkwardly situated.


  #2   Report Post  
Old May 26th 05, 11:54 AM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2005
Posts: 10
Default Bromley North Line


John Salmon wrote:
"Joe" wrote
Yea, that's why I asked. I was looking at the LDBs and all the trains
seem to be shuttles.
What's the reason for running it as a shuttle, anyone know? Congestion
on the MainLine & other services couldnt be cutBack?


The Bromley North branch also suffers from being on the "fast" side of the
layout at Grove Park - a bit like Coulsdon North on the Brighton line, which
closed largely, I think, as a result of the local (slow) and through (fast)
lines being swapped over in the 1980's, leaving it awkwardly situated.


Coulsdon North was always off the fast (Quarry) line - the 1980s
changes didn't alter tracks in that area. What they did do was
rationalise the arrangements between S. Croydon & Windmill
Bridge/Gloucester Rd.

I thought Coulsdon N closed because Smitham (next door) could perform
its functions very adequately.

Mike

  #3   Report Post  
Old May 26th 05, 04:21 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2003
Posts: 559
Default Bromley North Line


"mmellor" wrote

Coulsdon North was always off the fast (Quarry) line - the 1980s
changes didn't alter tracks in that area. What they did do was
rationalise the arrangements between S. Croydon & Windmill
Bridge/Gloucester Rd.

I'm not sure that's quite right. IIRC the local lines ran on the west side
of the formation from Windmill Bridge Junction right through to Coulsdon
North. The Quarry Lines took off from the Through Lines at Stoats Nest (just
north of Coulsdon), but it was possible for trains to run into and out of
Coulsdon North on the Local Lines without conflicting with trains running
between the Through Lines and the Quarry Lines.

I thought Coulsdon N closed because Smitham (next door) could perform
its functions very adequately.

When the track rationalisation was carried out, it was much easier for local
trains on the Slow Lines on the east of the formation to reach Smitham than
it would have been for them to get to Coulsdon North.

Peter



  #4   Report Post  
Old May 26th 05, 04:36 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2005
Posts: 2
Default Bromley North Line


"mmellor" wrote

Coulsdon North was always off the fast (Quarry) line


Agreed.

- the 1980s
changes didn't alter tracks in that area. What they did do was
rationalise the arrangements between S. Croydon & Windmill
Bridge/Gloucester Rd.


So what route (i.e. which right-hand crossovers) did fast services (in both
directions) take between the Quarry lines and the former "through" platforms
(4 & 5?) at East Croydon? I had assumed the move was made at Stoats Nest,
but if it was actually at South Croydon, then I concede that you're right.

I thought Coulsdon N closed because Smitham (next door) could perform
its functions very adequately.


I agree that they used that reason to justify the closure - the Smitham
terminators date from that time, I think.


  #5   Report Post  
Old May 26th 05, 04:42 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2003
Posts: 559
Default Bromley North Line


"John Salmon" wrote

So what route (i.e. which right-hand crossovers) did fast services (in

both
directions) take between the Quarry lines and the former "through"

platforms
(4 & 5?) at East Croydon? I had assumed the move was made at Stoats Nest,


That is correct. When the layout was rationalised, one of the changes was
relaying the Stoats Nest crossovers. Previously, travelling south, they ran
from the old Through Lines (eastern pair) to the Quarry Lines. Afterwards
they ran from the new Fast Lines (western pair) to the old line through
Redhill.

Peter




  #6   Report Post  
Old May 28th 05, 09:47 AM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2005
Posts: 10
Default Bromley North Line



Peter Masson wrote:
"John Salmon" wrote

So what route (i.e. which right-hand crossovers) did fast services (in

both
directions) take between the Quarry lines and the former "through"

platforms
(4 & 5?) at East Croydon? I had assumed the move was made at Stoats Nest,


That is correct. When the layout was rationalised, one of the changes was
relaying the Stoats Nest crossovers. Previously, travelling south, they ran
from the old Through Lines (eastern pair) to the Quarry Lines. Afterwards
they ran from the new Fast Lines (western pair) to the old line through
Redhill.

Peter


Up non-stoppers went through platform 1 (the westernmost platform) at
East Croydon, though. Both pairs had both fast trains and stoppers
(Victoria-Coulsdon N on the western pair, Charing X-Caterham?Tattenham
Corner on the eastern).

Mike

  #7   Report Post  
Old May 28th 05, 06:59 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 359
Default Bromley North Line

On 28 May 2005 02:47:11 -0700, "mmellor" wrote:

Up non-stoppers went through platform 1 (the westernmost platform) at
East Croydon, though. Both pairs had both fast trains and stoppers
(Victoria-Coulsdon N on the western pair, Charing X-Caterham?Tattenham
Corner on the eastern).


Is it my imagination, or were there through lines between platforms 2
and 3 (and maybe 4 and 5) in the past?
--
Terry Harper
Website Coordinator, The Omnibus Society
http://www.omnibussoc.org
  #8   Report Post  
Old May 29th 05, 10:01 AM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2005
Posts: 10
Default Bromley North Line



Terry Harper wrote:
On 28 May 2005 02:47:11 -0700, "mmellor" wrote:

Up non-stoppers went through platform 1 (the westernmost platform) at
East Croydon, though. Both pairs had both fast trains and stoppers
(Victoria-Coulsdon N on the western pair, Charing X-Caterham?Tattenham
Corner on the eastern).


Is it my imagination, or were there through lines between platforms 2
and 3 (and maybe 4 and 5) in the past?



There was a non-platform road between patforms 2 & 3, but I think it
was just a siding. From memory, there wasn't enough room for another
track between the platform ends under the station building.

Mike

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bromley North ken London Transport 4 July 12th 14 08:04 PM
Large UXB in Bromley-by-Bow Mizter T London Transport 45 June 11th 08 09:56 PM
North London Line update Paul G London Transport 15 June 17th 06 12:39 AM
Improvements to the North London Line [email protected] London Transport 39 June 22nd 05 09:37 PM
District Line tunnel visible in building site on north side of Victoria Street John Rowland London Transport 1 January 31st 04 12:03 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017