Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
R.C. Payne wrote:
Troy Steadman wrote: "Peter Lawrence" wrote in message From Sunday Times article on the CTRL at St Pancras: ' Just as the Midland had ploughed up corpses to build its tracks, so the new work unearthed further remains. In fact, no fewer than 7,000 bodies came out of the ground just north of the station.' Were there really so many bodies found? When I asked a CTRL lecturer last year whether any bodies had been unearthed the answer was ' yes, a few'. I wonder which report is accurate. "The graveyard posed the initial problems, the main line was to pass over on a girder bridge and the branch to the Metropolitan under in a tunnel. The disturbance of the remains was expected but was, initially, carelessly handled. The tunnelling was especially delayed by the presence of decomposing matter, the many coffins encountered, and a London-wide outbreak of cholera leading to the requirement to enclose the Fleet River entirely in iron. Despite this the connection was completed in January 1867". http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclop...ailway-station I'd believe 7,000. For the Midland, yes, but was the OP not asking about the CTRL? Can you remind us where the north London terminus of the CTRL is? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brimstone wrote:
R.C. Payne wrote: Troy Steadman wrote: "Peter Lawrence" wrote in message From Sunday Times article on the CTRL at St Pancras: ' Just as the Midland had ploughed up corpses to build its tracks, so the new work unearthed further remains. In fact, no fewer than 7,000 bodies came out of the ground just north of the station.' Were there really so many bodies found? When I asked a CTRL lecturer last year whether any bodies had been unearthed the answer was ' yes, a few'. I wonder which report is accurate. "The graveyard posed the initial problems, the main line was to pass over on a girder bridge and the branch to the Metropolitan under in a tunnel. The disturbance of the remains was expected but was, initially, carelessly handled. The tunnelling was especially delayed by the presence of decomposing matter, the many coffins encountered, and a London-wide outbreak of cholera leading to the requirement to enclose the Fleet River entirely in iron. Despite this the connection was completed in January 1867". http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclop...ailway-station I'd believe 7,000. For the Midland, yes, but was the OP not asking about the CTRL? Can you remind us where the north London terminus of the CTRL is? The OP was talking about more bodies being exhumed during the CTRL works recently, in addition to those originally exhumed for the construction of the Midland. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Arquati wrote:
Brimstone wrote: R.C. Payne wrote: Troy Steadman wrote: "Peter Lawrence" wrote in message From Sunday Times article on the CTRL at St Pancras: ' Just as the Midland had ploughed up corpses to build its tracks, so the new work unearthed further remains. In fact, no fewer than 7,000 bodies came out of the ground just north of the station.' Were there really so many bodies found? When I asked a CTRL lecturer last year whether any bodies had been unearthed the answer was ' yes, a few'. I wonder which report is accurate. "The graveyard posed the initial problems, the main line was to pass over on a girder bridge and the branch to the Metropolitan under in a tunnel. The disturbance of the remains was expected but was, initially, carelessly handled. The tunnelling was especially delayed by the presence of decomposing matter, the many coffins encountered, and a London-wide outbreak of cholera leading to the requirement to enclose the Fleet River entirely in iron. Despite this the connection was completed in January 1867". http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclop...ailway-station I'd believe 7,000. For the Midland, yes, but was the OP not asking about the CTRL? Can you remind us where the north London terminus of the CTRL is? The OP was talking about more bodies being exhumed during the CTRL works recently, in addition to those originally exhumed for the construction of the Midland. Quite. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Brimstone" wrote in message
Dave Arquati wrote: The OP was talking about more bodies being exhumed during the CTRL works recently, in addition to those originally exhumed for the construction of the Midland. Quite. The Midland went over and the connection to the Metropolitan went under St Pancras and St Giles's Churchyards. I was under the impression that the CTRL cuts new ground through St Pancras Churchyard. -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bank bodies | London Transport | |||
CTRL | London Transport | |||
CTRL Breakout | London Transport | |||
CTRL Section 2 aerial photos | London Transport | |||
Is the CTRL the first new railway in Britian since 1900? | London Transport |