Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Plus has Sudbury Hill Harrow looks like it loses it's 'limited service'
station symbol simply because it's incompatible with the 'interchange station' symbol. Odd. This happens at some stations (Wimbledon) but not others (Stratford)... A brief timetable check suggests it doesn't benefit from anything more than a train an hour off-peak. I'm all for pointing out the proximity of stations to one another on a map, but in this instance it looks like the passenger both wins and loses in the battle for gleaning useful travel information from this map. |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe wrote:
gwr4090 wrote: But no services shown out of St Pancras ? Probably because (Midland Mainline) services out of St Pancras dont stop anywhere inside the London Connections map area, the same as GNER services from Kings X are not shown[1]. Though, FGW services aren't shown[1], and I seem to remember they had a select few services stopping at Slough. [1] All these services Are shown on the Ldn & SE map on the reverse though, like normal. St Pancras was only shown as having Thameslink services during the blockade. |I've just checked and the pre-blockade London Connections map (June 2004) shows St Pancras in the same manner as this new (May 2005) map, i.e. without any services running from it. |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() 1577+2260 wrote: On 7 Jun 2005 02:24:00 -0700, "Rupert Candy" wrote: - New limited SET service between Elephant & Castle and Herne Hill About time too - that service is much less 'limited' than some shown on that map (Streatham Hill-Tulse Hill and New Beckenham-Beckenham Junction spring to mind), and is heavily used, but I don't believe it's ever been shown before. It appears that in this new version they've decided to show all[1] TOCs' peak services, whereas previously they didn't bother if the peak extras didn't cover any completely new routes. So for example in the case of Southern via Bookham, it didn't actually cover any new links or stations, so omitting it didn't remove any possible journey opportunities from the map, whereas the Beckenham connection provided a unique service. So they seem to have moved from being tidier to being more comprehensive. [1] Someone's going to notice an exception now, aren't they? I haven't seen the new map yet, but it sounds like a lot of the old inconsistencies have finally been corrected. This isn't an exception as such, but a regular off-peak service which was never shown was Weybridge to Waterloo via Brentford, while they showed the one train a day from woking to Staines or whatever. It's different from the other examples in that it's not a peak service that they omitted. Hat that been fixed now as well? What about the South East map in the Chislehurst area? Does that show a junction now? That was strangely removed not that long ago and never came back, even as a restricted service (Cannon Street to Ramsgate etc), possibly around the time that all Maidstone East Services went from Victoria (with the introduction of 365s). |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Masson wrote:
"Mizter T" wrote Plus has Sudbury Hill Harrow looks like it loses it's 'limited service' station symbol simply because it's incompatible with the 'interchange station' symbol. A brief timetable check suggests it doesn't benefit from anything more than a train an hour off-peak. Which is a lot more than the very limited peak only service it had for many years until recently. Peter Fair point. 1TPH, whilst a bit sparse, still counts as a 'full' station rather than a 'limited service' station. 'Limited service' stations seem to be those only serverd by peak trains. |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, asdf wrote:
Plus has Sudbury Hill Harrow looks like it loses it's 'limited service' station symbol simply because it's incompatible with the 'interchange station' symbol. Odd. This happens at some stations (Wimbledon) but not others (Stratford)... Odd indeed. The root of the problem is that they don't have orthogonal visual codes for limitedness and interchangeness: a normal station is a filled coloured blob, a limited-service station is a hollow coloured blob, but an interchange station is a hollow black blob. Limitedness is shown by hollowness, but interchangeness is shown by hollowness *and* blackness, so there's no way to show interchangeness and limitedness. Thus, they have to choose which to use, and you're right, they haven't been consistent about it. Really, they need a visual code in which these properties are shown by orthogonal, composable features: if interchangeness was just blackness, that would work. It would look horrible, though. Also, they show normal stations on tube and rail lines differently, which is bad. tom -- It's the 21st century, man - we rue _minutes_. -- Benjamin Rosenbaum |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Dave Arquati wrote:
Tom Anderson wrote: On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Matthew Dickinson wrote: There's a new London Connections map out with Heathrow Connect depicted as a seperate service between Ealing Broadway & Heathrow Terminals 1,2 & 3. Is this in stations? Do you know if it's online anywhere? I'm not sure if we're talking about the TfL London Connections map (which is being superseded by the High Frequency Services map), or the ATOC London Connections map, which is the one that shows each TOC in a different colour. I think it's the latter which has been updated, because it's the only one that showed the stations at Shepherd's Bush and Imperial Wharf WLL. Aha! Yes, of course. tom -- It's the 21st century, man - we rue _minutes_. -- Benjamin Rosenbaum |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In uk.railway Mizter T wrote:
St Pancras was only shown as having Thameslink services during the blockade. |I've just checked and the pre-blockade London Connections map (June 2004) shows St Pancras in the same manner as this new (May 2005) map, i.e. without any services running from it. Though the map now shows services to Nottingham, Derby, Sheffield etc as extensions of Thameslink from West Hampstead. Theo |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Mizter T wrote:
Tom Anderson wrote: On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Matthew Dickinson wrote: London Connections map Is this in stations? Do you know if it's online anywhere? TfL's online support for this map is rather spotty - the version in stations (prior to this) is the 'high frequency services' one, but i can't find this online; it was definitely available at one point, but all TfL's links go to the previous versions. Grr. Okay, rant over! There was/is a TfL version of the London Connections map, which is now called the 'High Frequency Services' map when it appears at Tube stations, or is simply entitled 'Travelcard Zones' when it appears in leaflets. I think they've ditched the 'London Connections' name (though the PDF file of the 'Travelcard Zones' map available from the TfL website is called "lon_con.pdf"). And moreover, it's still the old map: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/pdfdocs/lon_con.pdf I am absolutely positive that at some point, the new map was online. Maybe i'm losing my mind. tom -- It's the 21st century, man - we rue _minutes_. -- Benjamin Rosenbaum |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mizter T" wrote Fair point. 1TPH, whilst a bit sparse, still counts as a 'full' station rather than a 'limited service' station. 'Limited service' stations seem to be those only serverd by peak trains. The only 1tph stations I can think of in Greater London are Sudbury Hill Harrow, Chelsfield, Knockholt, and Belmont (IIRC Banstead and Epsom Downs are outside Greater London). The only peak hours only stations, IIRC, are Sudbury and Harrow Road, the Natiuonal Rail platforms at Barbican and Moorgate (Thameslink), and Shoreditch (LUL). Is anyone aware of any I have omitted? Peter |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Anderson wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Mizter T wrote: Tom Anderson wrote: On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Matthew Dickinson wrote: London Connections map Is this in stations? Do you know if it's online anywhere? TfL's online support for this map is rather spotty - the version in stations (prior to this) is the 'high frequency services' one, but i can't find this online; it was definitely available at one point, but all TfL's links go to the previous versions. Grr. Okay, rant over! There was/is a TfL version of the London Connections map, which is now called the 'High Frequency Services' map when it appears at Tube stations, or is simply entitled 'Travelcard Zones' when it appears in leaflets. I think they've ditched the 'London Connections' name (though the PDF file of the 'Travelcard Zones' map available from the TfL website is called "lon_con.pdf"). And moreover, it's still the old map: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/pdfdocs/lon_con.pdf I am absolutely positive that at some point, the new map was online. Maybe i'm losing my mind. tom The TfL map available online seems to call itself 'Travelcard Zones', and is the same one which you'll find in the back of the TfL Fares brochure. In all but name it is the same map that TfL used to call 'London Connections'. I can't remember if I've ever seen the TfL 'High Frequency Services' map online, though TfL have recently rejigged their website so perhaps your mind is not yet lost. Another useful map for deciphering Sarf London's labyrinth of railways is that provided by the 'Overground Network' (a TfL / SRA / TOC scheme to promote rail south of the river). It shows all stations and lines that provide a Metro-style service of 4 or more trains per hour. http://www.overgroundnetwork.com/pdf...etwork-map.pdf |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New London Connections map is available | London Transport | |||
New take on London Connections map | London Transport | |||
New 'London Connections' map with added LO and new family member,TfL Rail | London Transport | |||
New London Connections map... | London Transport |