Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Arquati wrote:
The ON map is very similar, just adding in the useful frequency element. Speaking of which, does anyone know what's happening to the ON? The website has never been updated, but I've noticed the orange and grey information boards appearing at Tulse Hill and Gipsy Hill (albeit without ON branding) and Brockley and New Cross Gate seem to have the line diagrams (though I don't think they were on the original routes). |
#62
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rupert Candy wrote:
Dave Arquati wrote: The ON map is very similar, just adding in the useful frequency element. Speaking of which, does anyone know what's happening to the ON? The website has never been updated, but I've noticed the orange and grey information boards appearing at Tulse Hill and Gipsy Hill (albeit without ON branding) and Brockley and New Cross Gate seem to have the line diagrams (though I don't think they were on the original routes). The announcement of funding for minor ON improvements to Earlsfield, Tulse Hill, Hayes, West Wickham, Eden Park and Norwood Junction was made in September last year. As for the other stations, I have no idea. I think the aim is to get the improvements (i.e. CCTV, lighting, cycle parking and improved information) rolled out to most of the stations marked on the ON map. On an ON note, one problem that appears to me is that part of the original South London Metro idea which this is based on was to promote better use of trains around South London itself, rather than just for journeys to and from the centre. The ON is centred around journeys to/from central London termini. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#63
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9 Jun 2005 05:24:24 -0700, "Rupert Candy"
wrote: Dave Arquati wrote: The ON map is very similar, just adding in the useful frequency element. Speaking of which, does anyone know what's happening to the ON? The website has never been updated, but I've noticed the orange and grey information boards appearing at Tulse Hill and Gipsy Hill (albeit without ON branding) and Brockley and New Cross Gate seem to have the line diagrams (though I don't think they were on the original routes). Orange/grey info boards and line diagrams on the platforms and footbridge appeared at Honor Oak Park a few weeks ago. It's a shame, because I think the Southern green/white is the best mainline signage in my lifetime. |
#64
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Most Mid-Kent line (Lewisham - Hayes) stations have now had most of the
work done. Lighting, CCTV, Help Points, better noticeboards, LUL style line maps of the stops from each platform. New ticket machines are being fitted this week. I'm not totally convinced by the ON brand but it is certainly allowing significant improvments to stations to take place. I guess once the work is done, some publicity would be good to tempt casual users onto trains for some local journeys. regards HN28 |
#65
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 09:21:11 on Tue,
7 Jun 2005, gwr4090 remarked: There's a new London Connections map out ..... But no services shown out of St Pancras ? First stop Luton Airport Parkway, which is off the edge of the map. But yes, I think StP is the only terminus with no services, shown on the map. -- Roland Perry |
#66
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 17:20:47 on Tue,
7 Jun 2005, Theo Markettos remarked: St Pancras was only shown as having Thameslink services during the blockade. |I've just checked and the pre-blockade London Connections map (June 2004) shows St Pancras in the same manner as this new (May 2005) map, i.e. without any services running from it. Though the map now shows services to Nottingham, Derby, Sheffield etc as extensions of Thameslink from West Hampstead. To be consistent with most [1] other terminii in naming only directly served destinations, it should really say "Luton, Airport, Bedford and The East Midlands". [1] The FGWL box would need Swindon, Bath and Bristol removing, too. -- Roland Perry |
#67
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Have you seen our frequency mapmovie? http://www.quickmap.com/map2tt.htm Andrew Matthew Dickinson wrote: There's a new London Connections map out with Heathrow Connect depicted as a seperate service between Ealing Broadway & Heathrow Terminals 1,2 & 3. The BAA stations are depicted outside the Zone 6 shading. It also has updated the opening dates for Shepherds Bush & Imperial Wharf to 2006. (These two stations were listed as calling points for the Silverlink service on the platform indicator at Clapham Junction yesterday) ![]() |
#68
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
James Farrar wrote:
It's a shame, because I think the Southern green/white is the best mainline signage in my lifetime. That's true - though presumably the station names and 'general' signage are still in the green and white (if they've been changed over yet)? Gipsy Hill has the lovely new signs attached to the crumbling old footbridge, where almost every step has now come loose... |
#69
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Jun 2005 00:59:15 -0700, "Rupert Candy"
wrote: James Farrar wrote: It's a shame, because I think the Southern green/white is the best mainline signage in my lifetime. That's true - though presumably the station names and 'general' signage are still in the green and white (if they've been changed over yet)? Yes, indeed. The grey just intrudes, IMO. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New London Connections map is available | London Transport | |||
New take on London Connections map | London Transport | |||
New 'London Connections' map with added LO and new family member,TfL Rail | London Transport | |||
New London Connections map... | London Transport |