Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Rupert Candy wrote: Bob Wood wrote: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...662717,00.html PREMIUM ROUTES Likely candidates for peak pricing: Liverpool Street to Chelmsford St Albans to King's Cross Elephant and Castle to Blackfriars East Croydon and Tulse Hill to Blackfriars/London Bridge Twyford and Maidenhead to Paddington Sevenoaks to Charing Cross/Cannon Street That's a very interesting list. Are they really the busiest routes in the country? (As a daily customer of Thameslink between Tulse Hill and Blackfriars I can well believe it, but Maidenhead to Paddington?) I thought that as well. I would have thought there were some obvious pinches, like Lewisham to Charing Cross (which has a reduced service in the peaks compared with off-peak and is generally packed solid). At least SET has finally made some suburban trains as long as they were when they were slam-door. The peak trains to London Bridge via East Croydon and Tulse Hill tend to be six coaches I think, and certainly never more than eight, yet they are not more crowded then the ten-coach SET services they are in parallel with on the approach to London Bridge. Where there is overcrowding on Southern, it is due to short trains, like a four-coach evening peak train I caught to Brockley a while back. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() MIG wrote: At least SET has finally made some suburban trains as long as they were when they were slam-door. The peak trains to London Bridge via East Croydon and Tulse Hill tend to be six coaches I think, and certainly never more than eight, yet they are not more crowded then the ten-coach SET services they are in parallel with on the approach to London Bridge. The peak Thameslinks through Tulse Hill are almost always 8 coaches (except on Monday, when everything was in the wrong place because of the problems near Bedford, which meant overcrowding that was dangerous rather than just uncomfortable!) The SET peak trains to Blackfriars via Herne Hill are generally 6 and busy but not overcrowded. Where there is overcrowding on Southern, it is due to short trains, like a four-coach evening peak train I caught to Brockley a while back. There used to be a London Bridge - Beckenham train at about 6.30 that was booked for a 2-coach 456, and every day the driver made an announcement that the train was *not* short formed. That was not a pleasant ride. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() There used to be a London Bridge - Beckenham train at about 6.30 that was booked for a 2-coach 456, and every day the driver made an announcement that the train was *not* short formed. That was not a pleasant ride. So I'm thinking, where trains are overcrowded due to being too short, they'll use the congestion charge to pay for more vehicles, so the trains won't be crowded any more and the congestion charge will be withdrawn? I wonder. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Enlarged Congestion Charging area | London Transport | |||
Congestion charging expansion plans: zone expansion. | London Transport | |||
Congestion Charging in Kensington | London Transport | |||
Legal challenges and congestion charging for 30 second journey leaving zone? | London Transport | |||
Crapita bailed-out over congestion charging | London Transport |