Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message ,
Colin Rosenstiel writes Two, boy 27 girl22. To whose transporting while young you contributed what? As I like walking (Don't tell Doug) I carried them on my shoulders. If you start when they're young and light you don't notice the gradual build up of weight. -- Clive |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:44:41 +0100, Clive
wrote: In message , Mrs Redboots writes While I find buggies on buses can be as annoying and intrusive as you evidently do, could I point out that a great many mothers of young children are obliged to work to make ends meet (and this has always been the case - the "Protestant work ethic" of father earning the family's living while mother stayed at home with the children was always a middle-class dream, never a working-class reality), so need to travel to work when you do. Perhaps *you* could change *your* working hours, since you are not encumbered by a family? Please do try not to be so appallingly, insensitively offensive. I am sorry for offending you, but I still think mothers with pushchairs should have then folded before even attempting to board a bus. You're right that I don't understand everyone's circumstances, but I do understand the room these things take up and that modern buses of the kneeling type are for wheelchair access not pushchair access. Quote from TFL website: 'Today, our buses are environmentally friendly and easy to use.........Low-floor vehicles, retractable ramps and designated spaces for wheelchairs and pushchairs means improved accessibility for more people. A little thought would confirm my position, and I am white and working class. Just go back a few years and you'll remember that whilst we had rear loading with a conductor, he would refuse access to someone with an unfolded pushchair and would only wait for it to be folded if the bus was a bit early. But the design of buses has improved and the parents , who are much more numerous than wheelchair users, might reasonably expect that they don't have to mess around with folding buggies any more. -- Peter Lawrence |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Peter Lawrence
writes But the design of buses has improved and the parents , who are much more numerous than wheelchair users, might reasonably expect that they don't have to mess around with folding buggies any more. Are they prepared to fold up a pushchair if a wheelchair user gets on a bus they are already on? -- Clive |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:44:41 +0100, Clive
wrote: I am sorry for offending you, but I still think mothers with pushchairs should have then folded before even attempting to board a bus. You're right that I don't understand everyone's circumstances, but I do understand the room these things take up and that modern buses of the kneeling type are for wheelchair access not pushchair access. No, they're not. They are provided with a low floor to aid access to everyone, be they in a wheelchair, with a pram or with lots of luggage, or often in mainland Europe with a bicycle. As it so happens, a wheelchair has priority over the other items, because it would generally be very difficult or impossible for its owner to fold it and put it elsewhere. The space exists. It may as well be used to assist those travelling. Personally, I would not put tip-up seats in the space concerned, be it on a bus or a train; not doing so avoids arguments, and the space can be used for standing if the bus is really busy. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK When replying please use neil at the above domain 'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read. |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:33:23 +0100, Clive
wrote: Are they prepared to fold up a pushchair if a wheelchair user gets on a bus they are already on? They certainly should be. If they are not (assuming they are able to do so), they are then being inconsiderate. Merely boarding an empty bus with an unfolded pram is not in itself an inconsiderate act. It is using the available facilities appropriately. (No, incidentally, I do not have young children). Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK When replying please use neil at the above domain 'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read. |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:18:42 +0100, Paul Corfield
wrote: As others have said the space on these buses is for wheelchair users not specifically for buggies which are carried unfolded as a favour not a right. As I've said elsewhere, as have others, it is multipurpose space. The order of priority would, in my mind, typically be:- 1. wheelchair user 2. any passenger with an item that won't fit anywhere else on the bus without causing an obstruction, e.g. pram, very large or heavy suitcases etc 3. any other passenger As I also said elsewhere, I'd remove the seats from the space as it avoids arguments. Certainly on a decker, there are plenty of other seats, and if the bus is so full that the last 2 are needed, more standing space will come in useful at the next stop. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK When replying please use neil at the above domain 'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read. |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Neil Williams
writes kneeling type are for wheelchair access not pushchair access. No, they're not. Yes they are, do you think that councils would go to the trouble of increasing curb heights at bus stops and bus companies providing special (therefore more expensive) busses than needed if it weren't for the legislation around access to invalids such as wheelchair users? -- Clive |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Buggies are wheelchairs! | London Transport | |||
Buggies are wheelchairs! | London Transport |