Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
£2.50 for a *Single* High Wycombe - Beaconsfield. Value?
For the sake of comparison, the LACMTA serve the County of Los Angeles. LA Co. covers an area of some 4,061 square miles. Any single trip on an MTA (better know as Metro) Bus, or Train is USD1.35 that would be well under GBP1.00). No transfer is allowed on a single ticket. However an all day pass is USD3.00. A monthly pass is USD52.00. However many employers subsidize transit and van pool commuting. For example my employer buys the monthly passes from the MTA and sells them to staff for USD28.00. With the pass my employer gives me a discount card. All meals purchased in the company's cafeteria are reduced in cost by 25%. In practice that means lunch costs me 3 to 4 dollars a day instead of 4 to 5 dollars. I calculate that, with the meal discount, my commute of 28 miles each way, twice a day is costing me under USD8.00 a month. That would be under GBP5.00 a month. So, I do find any bus and rail fares in the UK expensive. That aside, I still enjoy my visits. A. |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Jul 2005 14:37:53 -0700, "Adrian Auer-Hudson"
wrote: I think it is, Aylesbury hasn't had such a good train service in years! So if there was an hourly service to and from Birmingham, Banbury and Buckingham, running sans stops, save Amersham and Harrow, between Ayesbury and Marylebone, you would consider that good? Right? It would certainly be interesting if Chiltern decide to run any such services after the line through GX reopens. There is obviously plenty of demand for Watford-Birmingham travel, as Virgin stop (some of) their trains at Watford Junction, so it's not totally inconceivable that a decent-sized market exists for direct Harrow/Amersham/Aylesbury to Birmingham services too (and to Banbury, etc). (Although the Chiltern route is slower, I'd say it's still a valid comparison - most people seem to place more value on the fact that it's a through service. And of course there's the price difference.) |
#53
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
asdf wrote:
It would certainly be interesting if Chiltern decide to run any such services after the line through GX reopens. The normal service is just fine, with an easy interchange at Princes Risborough. I have used it often. |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message .com, at
15:00:55 on Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Adrian Auer-Hudson remarked: For the sake of comparison, the LACMTA serve the County of Los Angeles. LA Co. covers an area of some 4,061 square miles. Any single trip on an MTA (better know as Metro) Bus, or Train is USD1.35 that would be well under GBP1.00). No transfer is allowed on a single ticket. Fares are much the same on the Atlanta Marta ($1.75 for a single fare that could be - and I made that trip frequently - as far as 20 miles [further than Gerrards Cross to Central London]). But the Marta fares only pay a third of the cost of the system. The other two thirds is paid for by an extra 1% sales tax levied on the residents of certain well-off counties in the metro area. As far as I'm aware, the lines being compared within the UK don't have a public subsidy, and have to run at a profit (or even worse, have to pay the government a levy). -- Roland Perry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Paddington to Gerrards Cross parliamentary train | London Transport | |||
Charged more to cross London than Aberystwyth to London UPDATE | London Transport | |||
Gerrards Cross - compensation refused | London Transport | |||
Kings Cross development proposals and Cross River Tram Link | London Transport | |||
Huge Tunnel across Chiltern Line at Gerrards Cross | London Transport |