Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 19:03:07 +0100, Tom Anderson
wrote: On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, the new avenger wrote: Part of the duties of Centrecomm, the Transport for London bus Control Centre, involve coordinating bus operations and liaison with the emergency services and local authorities in any major incident in the Capital. There are very comprehensive emergency procedures under which service buses can be commandeered for removal of casualties and for the transport of persons involved in the aftermath. Centrecomm is at the heart of these activities. I've never heard of them before. Do they have a bunker? Please tell me they have a bunker. tom Hardly. Centrecomm is part of London Buses and is based at Company HQ. Rob. -- rob at robertwoolley dot co dot uk |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Robert Woolley wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 19:03:07 +0100, Tom Anderson wrote: On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, the new avenger wrote: Part of the duties of Centrecomm, the Transport for London bus Control Centre, involve coordinating bus operations and liaison with the emergency services and local authorities in any major incident in the Capital. There are very comprehensive emergency procedures under which service buses can be commandeered for removal of casualties and for the transport of persons involved in the aftermath. Centrecomm is at the heart of these activities. I've never heard of them before. Do they have a bunker? Please tell me they have a bunker. Hardly. Centrecomm is part of London Buses and is based at Company HQ. They need a bunker. tom -- 3364147 Complete space vehicles (excluding propulsion systems) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 21:30:55 +0100, Tom Anderson
wrote: Hardly. Centrecomm is part of London Buses and is based at Company HQ. They need a bunker. Presumably if the situation was bad enough to need a bunker, said buses probably won't be any use anyway, or people could just take and use them as required as law and order would likely have broken down. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK When replying please use neil at the above domain 'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 19:03:07 +0100, Tom Anderson
wrote: On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, the new avenger wrote: "Ian Jelf" wrote in message ... The use of ordinary service buses to transport the injured in London this morning appears to have been a widespread and planned-for action. Is there any precedent for this, I wonder? I'm sure we did this after the Clapham crash - by local arrangement though. P |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian Jelf wrote:
The use of ordinary service buses to transport the injured in London this morning appears to have been a widespread and planned-for action. I have to say, I hope they weren't used to transport the survivors of the bus bomb. How traumatic to be packed on to ANOTHER bus after that. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Ian Jelf wrote: The use of ordinary service buses to transport the injured in London this morning appears to have been a widespread and planned-for action. I have to say, I hope they weren't used to transport the survivors of the bus bomb. How traumatic to be packed on to ANOTHER bus after that. Unfortunately, its hard to observe such niceties at times like these. With the Ambulance Service at full stretch, it is necessary to use any alternative transport for walking wounded (so that emergency vehicles can be concentrated on stretcher patients needing advanced life support). The LAS will be utilising as many PTS (outpatient) vehicles where they can. But buses are ideal and already in the areas affected so time can be saved. The buses may also have been moving people who are uninjured and not directly involved: ie those caught up in the disruption. In situations such as this, pragmatism has to win out over sentimentality I'm afraid. Simon |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "the new avenger" wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... Ian Jelf wrote: The use of ordinary service buses to transport the injured in London this morning appears to have been a widespread and planned-for action. I have to say, I hope they weren't used to transport the survivors of the bus bomb. How traumatic to be packed on to ANOTHER bus after that. Unfortunately, its hard to observe such niceties at times like these. With the Ambulance Service at full stretch, it is necessary to use any alternative transport for walking wounded (so that emergency vehicles can be concentrated on stretcher patients needing advanced life support). The LAS will be utilising as many PTS (outpatient) vehicles where they can. But buses are ideal and already in the areas affected so time can be saved. The buses may also have been moving people who are uninjured and not directly involved: ie those caught up in the disruption. In situations such as this, pragmatism has to win out over sentimentality I'm afraid. Simon Phone network grind to a halt to... http://www.systemtek.co.uk/News/Other/other_070705.htm all all the rest..tereble |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ian Jelf" wrote in message ... The use of ordinary service buses to transport the injured in London this morning appears to have been a widespread and planned-for action. Is there any precedent for this, I wonder? Yes. World War 2. .... don't EFE have a bus in US ambulance colours? and to a lesser extent ... World War 1. -- IanH |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"ian henden" wrote in message
... "Ian Jelf" wrote in message ... The use of ordinary service buses to transport the injured in London this morning appears to have been a widespread and planned-for action. Is there any precedent for this, I wonder? Yes. World War 2. .... don't EFE have a bus in US ambulance colours? and to a lesser extent ... World War 1. Also all bus drivers in Kent and Sussex (and other areas I assume) where issued with instructions during WW2 as to what to do if they where on normal stage carriage service and the Germans invaded. Basically it was a scheme to ferry as many of the population as far away from the South Coast as possible using buses already in the area. Thankfully it was never needed! Regards John M Upton |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
and to a lesser extent ...
World War 1. -- Indeed, the drivers of the London General Omnibus Company actually drove some of their B class buses to the front in Flanders. An example of such a bus is in the Imperial War Museum, and this is the reason that its drivers and those of its successor, London Transport, and now the privatised bus companies (ironically one of them being the General!) are allowed to parade before the Cenotaph on Remembrance Sunday. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Drivers telling passengers to use the emergency buttons... | London Transport | |||
Drivers telling passengers to use the emergency buttons... | London Transport | |||
[OT] Emergency STW demo in London tomorrow | London Transport | |||
Bus stop sign covered and marked 'not in use' and a temporary bus stop sign right next to it | London Transport | |||
Northern line emergency engineering | London Transport |