Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 19:42:28 +0100, "nick" wrote:
Was there a power surge? If so, what caused it? Certainly, if there was a power surge, there should be a very good record that it occurred. My personal thought is that this was just a cover story to avoid mass panic while trying to evacuate the rest of the Underground network. At this initial stage the total number of devices was unknown, and indeed a possibility that gas or chemicals could have been used. I would imagine therefore that they wanted to clear the network as quickly as possible to prevent further injuries / deaths, but without causing undue panic. Certainly the very early report stated "British Transport Police said the incident happened on the Metroplitan Line and may have been caused by two trains colliding, a power cut or a power cable exploding", which was vague considering they had enough information to decide to close the whole network down. Or maybe I'm just reading too much into it. Duncan |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bob Crow Gets His Claim in 7 Years Early | London Transport | |||
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS | London Transport | |||
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS | London Transport | |||
TfL 70% claim - can this be true? | London Transport | |||
underground claim forms-text messaging. | London Transport |