Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Certainly, if there was a power surge, there should be a very good
record that it occurred. There wasn't a power surge. Initial indications suggested this as the most likely cause of the symptoms showing (traction current going off unexpectedly in multiple locations). When more information came to light, the true cause became apparent. LUL have confirmed that there was no power surge. "Duncan" wrote: My personal thought is that this was just a cover story to avoid mass panic while trying to evacuate the rest of the Underground network. [...] Certainly the very early report stated "British Transport Police said the incident happened on the Metroplitan Line and may have been caused by two trains colliding, a power cut or a power cable exploding", which was vague considering they had enough information to decide to close the whole network down. Or maybe I'm just reading too much into it. I think that you are. The reason for the network-wide closure was initially given as "power supply problems", and was not changed to "a network emergency" for a while (actually, not until after the bus has exploded, although the penny may have dropped before then - it obviously takes a few minutes for such information to permeate through). A very serious power surge might be enough to cause explosions, as well as causing the traction current to go off. Even after initial reports of explosions came through, it seems not unreasonable for a power surge to be considered as the cause (in the absence of any other information suggesting terrorism). And a difficult-to-trace power surge, causing explosions, is enough information on its own to decide to close the whole network down. According to CNN, Metronet [wrongly] admitted at 0927 that a power surge had caused an explosion at a station. The order for staff to evacuate came some time after the order to close the system to passengers (in fact, the system was closed to passengers before the bus exploded, but staff were not ordered to evacuate until after it had exploded). This all suggests that a power surge was still the accepted theory at the time that the network was closed. MetroGnome |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bob Crow Gets His Claim in 7 Years Early | London Transport | |||
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS | London Transport | |||
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS | London Transport | |||
TfL 70% claim - can this be true? | London Transport | |||
underground claim forms-text messaging. | London Transport |