Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Phil Lepherd
writes Is it just me, or has the amount of emergency services using their sirens increased in the days since 7/7? Each and every time I set foot outside this week, the air has been split by about three emergency vehicles sreaming past. Hey! As I type this I can hear the shreik through the window! Or maybe I'm only noticing the racket now. I work near Aldgate and by 5 pm on that Thursday the sirens were beginning to get to most of us at work. It's like trying to carry on as usual in a war zone, and I would imagine most people in the City had the same experience. Now I just think we're all a bit over sensitive to sirens, but hopefully that will fade. I saw a lot of police cars charging along empty roads, sirens going like mad that afternoon. Was it necessary, does it help ? I think it's a bit soon to ask, but the use of sirens and their effect on the morale of the populace needs looking at IMHO. -- Edward Cowling London UK |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I saw a lot of police cars charging along empty roads, sirens going like mad that afternoon. Was it necessary, does it help ? I think it's a bit soon to ask, but the use of sirens and their effect on the morale of the populace needs looking at IMHO. Unfortunatly, the police will be critisiced whatever they do. I'm an ex member of the emergency services and can assure you that blue lights and sirens are only used in genuine emergencies, although very often these emergencies turn out to be less urgent once you arrive there. I was a paramedic, if we got a call to, say, a collapse, we'd obviously use lights and sirens to get there. Once in attendence at the **** head trying to get a days sleep in a doorway somewhere, in hindsight the quick response was completely unnecessary, but going on the information given by the original 999 caller completely required. So, what do the police do? Not use sirens and drive cautiously to every call, wishing when they get there and find it is a genuine emergency they got there quicker? Or, respond to every call urgently, realising that a number of those calls will be completely false alarms? What happens if they are driving to a call without sirens and someone steps off a pavement in front of them. Will they get criticised for not using the siren? Personally, I used to turn the siren off if there was no traffic, and no obvious hazards ahead. A (very) few of my colleagues used to turn the siren on leaving the station, and off once they got to the scene. Each to their own. The end of the day, those few were probably taking the safest option. Anyone who complains about police cars whizzing about have got to ask themselves, if they were being attacked and call the police for help, would they want the police to attend urgently or not? The police officers wouldn't know if it was a genuine call until they arrived at you. Is it a hoax? Mates larking about? A domesitic row? Just because you phone up and say its genuine doesn't make it any different to any of the other calls they've been out to that day. Some urgent, some not. Some genuine, some not. All equally urgent to the emergency staff until they actually arrive on scene. Personally, I'd rather be criticised for making to much noise than taking too long to get to a call. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"terzal" wrote in message
oups.com... Personally, I used to turn the siren off if there was no traffic, and no obvious hazards ahead. A (very) few of my colleagues used to turn the siren on leaving the station, and off once they got to the scene. Each to their own. That's my complaint too. It's not the use of sirens, which are obviously essential in busy areas, but what happens here in Balham is that police cars tear along with sirens blaring at 3.00am or 4.00am on an absolutely deserted Balham High Road! In this weather, those of us that live on the main road and have our bedroom windows open can't help but be woken up. I have had a letter published in the local paper on this issue, to no avail. I reckon these sirens are just penis extensions for some kiddie-coppers. Ian |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ian F." wrote in message
... "terzal" wrote in message oups.com... Personally, I used to turn the siren off if there was no traffic, and no obvious hazards ahead. A (very) few of my colleagues used to turn the siren on leaving the station, and off once they got to the scene. Each to their own. That's my complaint too. It's not the use of sirens, which are obviously essential in busy areas, but what happens here in Balham is that police cars tear along with sirens blaring at 3.00am or 4.00am on an absolutely deserted Balham High Road! In this weather, those of us that live on the main road and have our bedroom windows open can't help but be woken up. Are there no rules/guidance for use of sirens on emergency vehicles at a time of night when it would be illegal for other motorists to use their horns? I would expect the guidance to be: turn the siren off except when you are approaching a junction where traffic has priority over you or when there's an obvious hazard like a bunch of cars in front of you or people who look as if they're about to cross the road in front of you. I've noticed that ambulances switch between a laid-back slow wail when they are in light traffic and a much more urgent, insistent, faster whooping when they are approaching heavier traffic. I've also seen many ambulances and fire engines with just their blue lights on and no sirens, especially on sparsely-populated motorways. So it looks as if they are considerate. Police cars seem to be the worst offenders for leaving their sirens going full time. The converse is true: not using a siren when it's needed. One evening I was going home from work at dusk and had green lights approaching a set of traffic lights. Suddenly, from my right, a police car shot across from the right about 6 feet in front of me. Luckily I'd slowed down a bit from the 60 at which I'd been approaching because I thought the lights had been at green for a long time and might change soon. The police car was not using his siren: my fleeting impression was of just a single flash of his blue light as he passed my field of vision. I know that police cars are allowed to go though red lights, but they normally sound their siren on the approach and to take extra care if traffic that has priority over them doesn't have clear sight of them approaching and so will have no advance warning. I've always wondered what the law is about ordinary cars going through red lights to let an emergency vehicle behind get through. I was once in this situation: I was at the head of a queue of cars at traffic lights when a fire engine came up on my offside but was blocked from going the wrong way through the junction because some pillock had stopped on a box junction. So I thought: act first, defend my actions afterwards - I edged forwards, flashing my lights and hooting my horn to warn other traffic what I was doing and pulled at right angles to the direction I'd been going in to make room for the fire engine. I noticed one of the passengers in the fire engine stuck his arm out of the window and gave me a "thank you" wave for applying a bit of common sense. However I've also seen cars waiting dutifully at red lights with emergency vehicles stuck behind them for ages, probably because they are afraid of being penalised for going through a red light. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 17:46:32 +0100, "Martin Underwood"
wrote: Are there no rules/guidance for use of sirens on emergency vehicles at a time of night when it would be illegal for other motorists to use their horns? My flatmate reckons they shouldn't use them after 10pm, or something. -- Nick Cooper [Carefully remove the detonators from my e-mail address to reply!] The London Underground at War: http://www.cwgcuser.org.uk/personal/...ra/lu/tuaw.htm 625-Online - classic British television: http://www.625.org.uk 'Things to Come' - An Incomplete Classic: http://www.thingstocome.org.uk |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I haven't got my old manual to hand at the moment to look up the
precise wording of the instructions. The main exemptions from the Road Traffic Act that emergency vehicles can claim are to treat red traffic lights as give way signs, and to exceed the speed limit. Its worded something like where to obey them would hinder the vehicle in its duties. I don't think there is any actual mention of the use of lights and sirens as such, apart from a secondary exemption is the ability to use audible warnings at night. Individual services (and even preferences from one instructor to another) will have their own guidelines. The bottom line is, if you are claiming any exemption (eg speeding), then you could end up in court explaining both the reason why ("I was attending an emergency call"), and what means you were using to warn the public ("I had the blue lights and sirens on"). So although having the siren turned off, as you take out a pedestrian who steps out in front of you, wouldn't be in breach of any law as such, it probably would count towards your dangerous driving sentence. Consequently, any time the siren is turned off while attending an emergency call, the driver is to some extent putting other road users and his driving licence at risk. People will always come from nowhere. There will always be pedestrians who step off the kerb without looking and people who suddenly pull out of side turnings without looking. There has to be an element of common sense and as I said I and nearly all of my colleagues tended to turn the siren off if there was no visable hazard. But that was the risk we took. I wouldn't criticise anyone for taking the other option and leaving the siren on from station to scene. You only need a kid to run out from a shop across the road and the first question we'd be asked was whether the siren was turned on. I'm not at all taking issue with your post (you weren't being confrontational at all!) but any potential hazard is a hazard whether obvious or not. People by the side of the road might step out whether they look like they might or not, and unless they are well away from kerb would really need the siren to be sounded. Any junction whatever the priority is also to some extent a hazard. There has to be some common sense, but ultimately as I said any time the siren is turned off there is a risk (probably to the drivers licence and career more than to the public - I'm well aware sirens can also be disorienting to the public at times). I am sure having the siren turned off would always count against you in court. As for the vehicles with the sirens off when they should more obviously be turned on, there is a need for silent approach sometimes, but obviously extra care must be taken. Certainly from a paramedics point of view, with a patient on board we would try to keep the siren use to a minimum (although taking a patient in with blue lights going is relatively rare anyway) because of the stress to a conscious patient. I'm not trying to excuse bad driving on the part of emergency staff, obviously as in any job some people are more competent than others, but I do feel that the majority (not all) of the criticism they get is completely unjustified. As for how you stand going through a red light to make way for a fire engine, I dunno! I like to think that it would be taking into account..... |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It was a dark and stormy night when Martin Underwood
wrote in article 42d939eb$0$21993$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp- reader02.plus.net... The converse is true: not using a siren when it's needed. One evening I was going home from work at dusk and had green lights approaching a set of traffic lights. Suddenly, from my right, a police car shot across from the right about 6 feet in front of me. Luckily I'd slowed down a bit from the 60 at which I'd been approaching because I thought the lights had been at green for a long time and might change soon. The police car was not using his siren: my fleeting impression was of just a single flash of his blue light as he passed my field of vision. I know that police cars are allowed to go though red lights, but they normally sound their siren on the approach and to take extra care if traffic that has priority over them doesn't have clear sight of them approaching and so will have no advance warning. Same happened to me on my way home to London near Farnham, Hants; police car shot out across a light-controlled crossroads on the A31 at a good 60mph, while I was crossing under a green light at a similar speed, and missed me by a hairsbreadth. It would have been a spectacular smash if I'd been a second or two further on. I must admit my initial response (apart from pulling over to get my composure back) was to wonder whether, since there was no other traffic about at all, the driver (had he survived) would have been honest and admitted he had no siren going. (Or are these things logged like speed on a tachograph?) -- "All vampires suck, but not all who suck are vampires." (--B.J.Kuehl) :::Grebbsy :::::::lemon curry?::: |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16 Jul 2005 03:00:58 -0700, "terzal" said:
Anyone who complains about police cars whizzing about have got to ask themselves, if they were being attacked and call the police for help, would they want the police to attend urgently or not? Last time I called the police because someone was being attacked it took them over an hour to show up. Mind you, the victim was black so I suppose the police didn't think that was urgent. -- David Cantrell | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , David Cantrell
writes On 16 Jul 2005 03:00:58 -0700, "terzal" said: Anyone who complains about police cars whizzing about have got to ask themselves, if they were being attacked and call the police for help, would they want the police to attend urgently or not? Last time I called the police because someone was being attacked it took them over an hour to show up. Mind you, the victim was black so I suppose the police didn't think that was urgent. Last time I called them because someone was being attacked, they, the police, never turned up. It took the ambulance 45 minutes to arrive, the victim could have died choking on his own blood. A gang of youths had been using the poor guy's head as a football and the people who arrived on the scene just before me had chased off the gang. A prompt response might have enabled the police to pick up the gang involved immediately. The man had a broken jaw. To add insult to injury, when they eventually put up yellow witness request boards they got the wrong stretch of road and the wrong time of day. Just to even up the balance, this guy was white, and the gang were kids of all colours. -- Nicholas David Richards - "Oł sont les neiges d'antan?" |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
That Crazy 88 Bus | London Transport | |||
Tramlink needs Bustitution to meet capacity requirements - crazy | London Transport | |||
Where have all the RMs gone? | London Transport | |||
LUL Emergency Exits | London Transport | |||
Northern line emergency engineering | London Transport |