London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 19th 05, 08:57 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2004
Posts: 15
Default 9/11 - 7/7


David wrote in message
...

Is every bomb incident now going to be referred to by its date?
Referring to New Yorks as 9/11 (why are'nt we calling it 11/9) is bad
enough. Now we have 7/7. I'm still waiting to hear references to
Madrid's 11/3 or Bali's 12/10!
I hope one does not happen on 2nd February, 2/2 will sound rediculous



its becoming too much of a trend


  #2   Report Post  
Old July 19th 05, 09:20 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,796
Default 9/11 - 7/7

On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 20:57:23 +0000 (UTC), "dave F"
wrote:

I hope one does not happen on 2nd February, 2/2 will sound rediculous


its becoming too much of a trend


Getting into linguistic pedantry here, I think "9/11" is referred to
as such because there's not another short way to refer to it. "The
attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon" is a bit
long-winded.

By comparison, "the London bombings" is quite short and sufficiently
descriptive of such a conventional attack, and so I don't think we'll
get as many references to "7/7" except possibly from the other side of
the Atlantic.

Neil

--
Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK
When replying please use neil at the above domain
'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read.
  #3   Report Post  
Old July 19th 05, 10:12 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,429
Default 9/11 - 7/7

Neil Williams wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 20:57:23 +0000 (UTC), "dave F"
wrote:

I hope one does not happen on 2nd February, 2/2 will sound
rediculous


its becoming too much of a trend


Getting into linguistic pedantry here, I think "9/11" is referred to
as such because there's not another short way to refer to it. "The
attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon" is a bit
long-winded.

By comparison, "the London bombings" is quite short and sufficiently
descriptive of such a conventional attack,


e.g. 14 Jun 1917, 29 Dec 1940, 20 Jul 1982, 24 Apr 1993, and many more.
--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)

  #4   Report Post  
Old July 19th 05, 09:28 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2005
Posts: 6
Default 9/11 - 7/7

David Jul 15, 5:06 pm show options
Newsgroups: uk.transport.london
From: (David) -
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 21:06:13 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Fri,Jul 15 2005 5:06 pm
Subject: 9/11 - 7/7

Is every bomb incident now going to be referred to by its date?
Referring to New Yorks as 9/11 (why are'nt we calling it 11/9) is bad
enough. Now we have 7/7. I'm still waiting to hear references to
Madrid's 11/3 or Bali's 12/10!
I hope one does not happen on 2nd February, 2/2 will sound rediculous

Dave
The Reason its 9/11 is because the US emergency police fir &ambulance
is 911.

I'm alife long NYer but i was out of town on 9/11 but was at heathrow
when the london bombs went off.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017