Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Corfield" wrote in message ... On 19 Jul 2005 12:38:38 -0700, "mtveurope" wrote: by the way... if they only have problem with the cables why does circle will be working soon? does that line don't have cables? (I know it's not so close to the train, but they're still there, don't they? I have not seen any detailed information but both of the Circle Line bombs took place in wider tunnels and the trains are of a different profile to those of the Picc Line. Therefore the outward effect of the explosions would seem to be less. As there is more space in the sub surface tunnels then it is possible that there is less cable damage. All tube lines have a range of cables running alongside to provide telephone, communication, signalling and power supplies. The amount of cabling is potentially more complex at junctions and all of the explosions took place near junctions or crossovers so there is a clear need to be careful in clearing / cleaning / repairing the sites so that more damage is not caused in the short run. Yes, the cable run suffered from extensive damage. Don't forget that even once the signalling cables have been replaced, extensive testing needs to be carried out to ensure the rewiring is done correctly. Luckily, most of Aldgate was resignalled during the late 1980s so the diagrams should be available. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Robin Mayes
writes Yes, the cable run suffered from extensive damage. Don't forget that even once the signalling cables have been replaced, extensive testing needs to be carried out to ensure the rewiring is done correctly. Luckily, most of Aldgate was resignalled during the late 1980s so the diagrams should be available. Having recently retired from a life time of supporting, modifying and replacing 'legacy' IT systems allow me to express some doubt. Most 'legacy' IT systems are less than ten years old and their documentation invariably leaves much to be desired, no matter how good it was when the system was implemented. The two pointers that I can see to suggest there might be problems are age and the fact that responsibility for maintenance has been transferred to an out-sourcing company. When ever a transfer takes place, there is a dreadful tendency to 'rationalise' documentation and in so doing loose the essential data. -- Nicholas David Richards - "Oł sont les neiges d'antan?" |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
'Structrual damage' at Baker Street AM Friday 11th Feb | London Transport | |||
Tube ear damage | London Transport | |||
Tunnel routes Question | London Transport | |||
More heat damage | London Transport | |||
Tunnel Maps | London Transport |