Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
BBC News 24 reporting a "code amber" - shutdown of entire Underground
Now changed their story - only Vic, Northern, H&C have been shut |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Adrian wrote: Sensible precaution? Bit jumpy? Real risk [1]? Or copycats who think it's "funny"? [1] Not the best phrasing, but I cannot think of anything better at the moment. Hopefully you know what I mean. PhilD -- |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
asdf wrote:
BBC News 24 reporting a "code amber" - shutdown of entire Underground Now changed their story - only Vic, Northern, H&C have been shut Interestingly R5 are describing this as a "code amber on three lines". |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Adrian" wrote in message . 244.170... Simon Lane ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying : Conflicting report - "dummy explosions - detonators only" - just now on R5 - no one injured. Add a bus in Hackney to the list, too - but it looks intact from the shot that's apparently of the bus in question. Windows blown out according to the bus operating company. LU's done a "Code Amber" and turfed everybody off everything. Sensible precaution? Only for the affected lines. A very sensible precaution as explosions in tunnels cause far more injuries than ones in stations. Rescue efforts are also hampered if trains are in tunnels. Bit jumpy? 2 weeks to the day when 52 innocent poeple lost their lives. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In oups.com,
PhilD typed: Adrian wrote: Sensible precaution? Bit jumpy? Real risk [1]? Or copycats who think it's "funny"? [1] Not the best phrasing, but I cannot think of anything better at the moment. Hopefully you know what I mean. It's safer to presume that it is a real risk in all incidents like this. Without the injuries, we still have the massive disruption - the desired aim! -- Bob |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In oups.com,
Simon Lane typed: asdf wrote: BBC News 24 reporting a "code amber" - shutdown of entire Underground Now changed their story - only Vic, Northern, H&C have been shut Interestingly R5 are describing this as a "code amber on three lines". That's what 'code amber' means. All trains draw forward to platforms, passengers are evacuated to ground level and services suspended. -- Bob |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:10:18 GMT someone who may be "Bob Wood"
wrote this:- Without the injuries, we still have the massive disruption - the desired aim! And the explosives are saved for another day. It is also likely that it will encourage party politicians to do what the terrorists want, reduce our freedoms even more. -- David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number F566DA0E I will always explain revoked keys, unless the UK government prevents me by using the RIP Act 2000. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Wood wrote:
In oups.com, Simon Lane typed: asdf wrote: BBC News 24 reporting a "code amber" - shutdown of entire Underground Now changed their story - only Vic, Northern, H&C have been shut Interestingly R5 are describing this as a "code amber on three lines". That's what 'code amber' means. All trains draw forward to platforms, passengers are evacuated to ground level and services suspended. One injured at Warren Street - said to be person who was carrying rucksack whick exploded(!) - also confirmed reports of armed police entering University College Hospital on Radio London (I expect related to former point). |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
University College Hospital is evacuated and sealed of by armed police,
hopefully the injured person is one of the bombers. Bombs reported to be dummy nail bombs. Affected stations are Warren St. (Victoria), Oval (Northern) and Shephards Bush (Hammersmith & City), plus the No.26 bus Neill |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Simon Lane wrote:
What's happening - news flash on R4 mentioned incidents at a number of tube stations... UXB Shepherds Bush (police to R5 reporter) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS | London Transport | |||
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS | London Transport | |||
More bombs?? | London Transport | |||
More bombs?? | London Transport | |||
2 is more likely (was London bombs - the work of ONE man?) | London Transport |