Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Graeme Wall wrote: In message .com "MIG" wrote: [snip] And of course the 1991 Iraq war, when the US told Saudi Arabia that Iraqi troops were massing on their border to get US bases in there, You mean the Iraquis hadn't invaded Kuwait? and after which the US deliberately kept Sadam Hussein in power rather than help the opposition. "No UN mandate for regime change" The US did what people like you wanted, got out of Iraq as soon as the UN requirements were fulfilled, which was to eject the Iraquis from Kuwait. There was a local rebellion against the regime. They thought the invading troops would help. They didn't; they shafted them instead. That wasn't regime change imposed from outside. Unfortunately, that sort of regime change wouldn't have given Iraq's resources to US and British companies. We are straying a bit anyway. Shouldn't this topic be about what kind of trains they have in Iraq? |
#62
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message cCUlhtvFIYkV-pn2-C27MKJWQnhWC@localhost
"Ian Johnston" wrote: On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:35:41 UTC, Graeme Wall wrote: : The people currently doing the killing in Iraq are nuslims killing other : muslims, a bit like the situation in Northern Ireland. Or like the resistance shooting collaborators? No -- Graeme Wall This address is not read, substitute trains for rail. Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html |
#63
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What general policy is that?
The people currently doing the killing in Iraq are nuslims killing other muslims, a bit like the situation in Northern Ireland. Your political views are clearly different from mine. However, pretty much everything predicted over the last few years by those whose views are similar to mine is coming true. I don't think the people in Northern Ireland would see it the same way. One group felt that they were resisting the invading Catholic hordes, and the other group felt that they were resisting the invading British Empire. They certainly didn't see themselves as all being the same and they definitely saw outside influence as a cause of their disputes. |
#64
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message .com
"MIG" wrote: Graeme Wall wrote: In message .com "MIG" wrote: [snip] And of course the 1991 Iraq war, when the US told Saudi Arabia that Iraqi troops were massing on their border to get US bases in there, You mean the Iraquis hadn't invaded Kuwait? and after which the US deliberately kept Sadam Hussein in power rather than help the opposition. "No UN mandate for regime change" The US did what people like you wanted, got out of Iraq as soon as the UN requirements were fulfilled, which was to eject the Iraquis from Kuwait. There was a local rebellion against the regime. They thought the invading troops would help. Try getting your chronology right, the 'invading troops' had been withdrawn before the uprising They didn't; they shafted them instead. When did the Americans ever do anything else? That wasn't regime change imposed from outside. Unfortunately, that sort of regime change wouldn't have given Iraq's resources to US and British companies. The rebellion wasn't about regime change but secession from Iraq. The UN refused to allow support by third countries, not that the US were interested. The reason Dubya ignored the UN this time was partly because his perceived view that the UN had deliberatley thwarted his Dad's plans for an all-American world. We are straying a bit anyway. Shouldn't this topic be about what kind of trains they have in Iraq? Stanier 8Fs I believe. -- Graeme Wall This address is not read, substitute trains for rail. Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html |
#65
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message .com
"MIG" wrote: What general policy is that? The people currently doing the killing in Iraq are nuslims killing other muslims, a bit like the situation in Northern Ireland. Your political views are clearly different from mine. Are they? However, pretty much everything predicted over the last few years by those whose views are similar to mine is coming true. Given your apparent ignorance of the true state of affairs in the real world, how can you tell? I don't think the people in Northern Ireland would see it the same way. One group felt that they were resisting the invading Catholic hordes, and the other group felt that they were resisting the invading British Empire. So you don't even understand the basics of that dispute? They certainly didn't see themselves as all being the same and they definitely saw outside influence as a cause of their disputes. Did I say they saw themselves as all the same? Presumably you are totally unable to see a parallel between the conflicts of two subsects of Christianity and two subsects of Islam? -- Graeme Wall This address is not read, substitute trains for rail. Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html |
#66
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:28:43 UTC, Graeme Wall
wrote: : In message cCUlhtvFIYkV-pn2-C27MKJWQnhWC@localhost : "Ian Johnston" wrote: : : On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:35:41 UTC, Graeme Wall : wrote: : : : The people currently doing the killing in Iraq are nuslims killing other : : muslims, a bit like the situation in Northern Ireland. : : Or like the resistance shooting collaborators? : No How do you think they see themselves, then? Ian |
#67
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22 Jul 2005 12:08:14 GMT, Ian Johnston wrote in
cCUlhtvFIYkV-pn2-Njxhc0urG6Qh@localhost, seen in uk.railway: On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:42:03 UTC, Ross wrote: : Without extremists, there is no terrorism. Isn't that because /we/ define terrorists as extremists? The terrorists themselves may think that what they are doing is quite reasonable. Yes. After all, it's the difference between terrorists and freedom fighters - it depends on which side you're looking at it from. I think we *can* class the terrorists (and I'm not just talking about Al Qaeda) as extremists because they are outside the mainstream of their own espoused system, they have to distort ("interpret") the teachings of the system they espouse to justify their actions and their actions do harm (physical, political or other) to their own people more than to their enemy. It would be so much easier if they went around in capes and black masks carrying spherical bombs with long fizzing fuses... And wearing name badges showing the organisation to which they belonged:- [Al-Qaeda] [Hi! I'm name] [Let me help you to paradise] Sorry, that's probably a bit sick. -- Ross, Lincoln, UK We're *not* afraid http://www.werenotafraid.com |
#68
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can you be sure it was the police?
Given that the BBC says it was, probably not, no. The BBC is of course not perfect. But would you prefer to get so-called "news" and "information" from Rupert Murdoch and his minions? |
#69
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message cCUlhtvFIYkV-pn2-YXUQyXn7rHWv@localhost
"Ian Johnston" wrote: On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:28:43 UTC, Graeme Wall wrote: : In message cCUlhtvFIYkV-pn2-C27MKJWQnhWC@localhost : "Ian Johnston" wrote: : : On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:35:41 UTC, Graeme Wall : wrote: : : : The people currently doing the killing in Iraq are muslims killing : : other muslims, a bit like the situation in Northern Ireland. Or like the resistance shooting collaborators? : No How do you think they see themselves, then? "My version of whatever religion is the only true religion and anyone professing to be a true whatever who doesn't agree with me is a worthless heretic who must be eliminated for the greater good" Other religions don't count as they are by definition not religions at all. Means you can carry on fighting amongst yourselves to your hearts content. An extension of gang warfare. Applies to Catholics-Protestants in NI, Sunnis-Shi'ites in the Arab world, Arabs-Jews in the Middle East. Al Quaeda's objective is to widen it to Islam-Christianity. The common factor is that all the various sects involved are rooted in the Old Testament with its emphasis on intolerance and its championing of a 'chosen people'. -- Graeme Wall This address is not read, substitute trains for rail. Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html |
#70
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
Ross wrote: [snip] And wearing name badges showing the organisation to which they belonged:- [Al-Qaeda] [Hi! I'm name] [Let me help you to paradise] Sorry, that's probably a bit sick. Very sick, I like it. -- Graeme Wall This address is not read, substitute trains for rail. Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS | London Transport | |||
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS | London Transport | |||
More bombs?? | London Transport | |||
More bombs?? | London Transport | |||
2 is more likely (was London bombs - the work of ONE man?) | London Transport |