Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:58:38 UTC, Guy Gorton
wrote: : I have never understood this policy. Even in the armed forces a : wounded prisoner may be a source of information and certainly is to : the police. Firing at long range with inaccurate weapons there may be : no choice, but firing at short range with reasonably accurate weapons : there is. : Is it to do with fear that the wounded person still might be able to : fight back? I think it's because the police in this country only rarely carry weapons, and only use them when they believe there to be an immediate risk to life (OK, that's the theory, and it doesn't always work like that, but I still prefer it to having routinely armed police who think "running away" is justification for shooting). In other words, police guns are only supposed to be fired to stop someone else being killed, and in that case it is logical to make as certain as possible. Ian |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS | London Transport | |||
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS | London Transport | |||
More bombs?? | London Transport | |||
More bombs?? | London Transport | |||
2 is more likely (was London bombs - the work of ONE man?) | London Transport |