Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Ross wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:52:20 GMT, Bob Wood wrote in , seen in uk.railway: In , Bob Wood typed: [...] Eyewitness claiming small explosion in a rucksack - no casualties. I don't know which site this refers to. Also, train managed to continue to Warren Street where it was evacuated. I don't know whether this is the same incident. Radio 5 has just reported that these might be very small explosions - they are suggesting "detonators only". BBC News 24 report that LU "sources" are saying that nailbombs *without explosive* are involved I am curious as to what this "bomb without explosive", nail or otherwise, is. It seems to me that explosive is a rather important, perhaps even the defining, characteristic of a bomb. Are we perhaps dealing with some sort of zen buddhist or dadaist terror faction? tom -- Batman always wins |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More bombs? | London Transport | |||
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS | London Transport | |||
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS | London Transport | |||
More bombs?? | London Transport | |||
2 is more likely (was London bombs - the work of ONE man?) | London Transport |