| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
August 1st 05, 01:07 AM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Crow
In message , Robert Woolley
writes On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:42:28 +0100, Clive wrote: In message , Loony Tune writes Drivers got no more money when guards were removed They took extra responsibility for no extra pay? How mean fisted can a company get? I don't think 33k per annum is exacty 'mean fisted'. As Marc says, more police, fewer train staff.... Rob. -- rob at robertwoolley dot co dot uk Do you want to have the responsibility of a train plus a thousand passengers for only 33k after overtime and before stoppages? Indeed why should public service worker work longer hours just to supplement their wage? If you don't like the heat get out of the kitchen. All bus and tube drivers should resign, then see how the capital copes without them. -- Clive |
|
#22
August 1st 05, 08:39 AM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bob Crow
"Clive" wrote in message ... In message , Robert Woolley writes On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:42:28 +0100, Clive wrote: In message , Loony Tune writes Drivers got no more money when guards were removed They took extra responsibility for no extra pay? How mean fisted can a company get? I don't think 33k per annum is exacty 'mean fisted'. As Marc says, more police, fewer train staff.... Do you want to have the responsibility of a train plus a thousand passengers for only 33k after overtime and before stoppages? If you think 33k is a low wage then I think you need to think again. There are many people in London earning much less. Also most of use don't have to think about our pay "before stoppages" as we don't feel the need to walk out of jobs on a regular basis. Dave |
|
#23
August 1st 05, 08:49 AM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bob Crow
Dave Liney wrote:
"Clive" wrote in message ... In message , Robert Woolley writes On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:42:28 +0100, Clive wrote: In message , Loony Tune writes Drivers got no more money when guards were removed They took extra responsibility for no extra pay? How mean fisted can a company get? I don't think 33k per annum is exacty 'mean fisted'. As Marc says, more police, fewer train staff.... Do you want to have the responsibility of a train plus a thousand passengers for only 33k after overtime and before stoppages? If you think 33k is a low wage then I think you need to think again. There are many people in London earning much less. Also most of use don't have to think about our pay "before stoppages" as we don't feel the need to walk out of jobs on a regular basis. Perhaps if more people were willing to walk out they might have better pay and conditions? |
|
#24
August 1st 05, 09:28 AM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bob Crow
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 07:49:04 +0000 (UTC), "Brimstone"
wrote: Dave Liney wrote: "Clive" wrote in message ... In message , Robert Woolley writes On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:42:28 +0100, Clive wrote: In message , Loony Tune writes Drivers got no more money when guards were removed They took extra responsibility for no extra pay? How mean fisted can a company get? I don't think 33k per annum is exacty 'mean fisted'. As Marc says, more police, fewer train staff.... Do you want to have the responsibility of a train plus a thousand passengers for only 33k after overtime and before stoppages? If you think 33k is a low wage then I think you need to think again. There are many people in London earning much less. Also most of use don't have to think about our pay "before stoppages" as we don't feel the need to walk out of jobs on a regular basis. Perhaps if more people were willing to walk out they might have better pay and conditions? If I walked out, I'd get fired. -- James Farrar September's coming soon |
|
#25
August 1st 05, 10:07 AM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bob Crow
James Farrar wrote:
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 07:49:04 +0000 (UTC), "Brimstone" wrote: Dave Liney wrote: "Clive" wrote in message ... In message , Robert Woolley writes On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:42:28 +0100, Clive wrote: In message , Loony Tune writes Drivers got no more money when guards were removed They took extra responsibility for no extra pay? How mean fisted can a company get? I don't think 33k per annum is exacty 'mean fisted'. As Marc says, more police, fewer train staff.... Do you want to have the responsibility of a train plus a thousand passengers for only 33k after overtime and before stoppages? If you think 33k is a low wage then I think you need to think again. There are many people in London earning much less. Also most of use don't have to think about our pay "before stoppages" as we don't feel the need to walk out of jobs on a regular basis. Perhaps if more people were willing to walk out they might have better pay and conditions? If I walked out, I'd get fired. And if all the employees walked out? |
|
#26
August 1st 05, 10:44 AM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bob Crow
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 09:07:21 +0000 (UTC), "Brimstone"
wrote: James Farrar wrote: On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 07:49:04 +0000 (UTC), "Brimstone" wrote: Dave Liney wrote: "Clive" wrote in message ... In message , Robert Woolley writes On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:42:28 +0100, Clive wrote: In message , Loony Tune writes Drivers got no more money when guards were removed They took extra responsibility for no extra pay? How mean fisted can a company get? I don't think 33k per annum is exacty 'mean fisted'. As Marc says, more police, fewer train staff.... Do you want to have the responsibility of a train plus a thousand passengers for only 33k after overtime and before stoppages? If you think 33k is a low wage then I think you need to think again. There are many people in London earning much less. Also most of use don't have to think about our pay "before stoppages" as we don't feel the need to walk out of jobs on a regular basis. Perhaps if more people were willing to walk out they might have better pay and conditions? If I walked out, I'd get fired. And if all the employees walked out? We'd all get fired. -- James Farrar September's coming soon |
|
#27
August 1st 05, 10:48 AM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bob Crow
Dave Liney wrote: "Clive" wrote in message ... In message , Robert Woolley writes On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:42:28 +0100, Clive wrote: In message , Loony Tune writes Drivers got no more money when guards were removed They took extra responsibility for no extra pay? How mean fisted can a company get? I don't think 33k per annum is exacty 'mean fisted'. As Marc says, more police, fewer train staff.... Do you want to have the responsibility of a train plus a thousand passengers for only 33k after overtime and before stoppages? If you think 33k is a low wage then I think you need to think again. There are many people in London earning much less. Also most of use don't have to think about our pay "before stoppages" as we don't feel the need to walk out of jobs on a regular basis. Dave Can you imagine the reaction he would get with that attitude if he rolled up at A&E having had an accident. Kevin |
|
#28
August 1st 05, 12:27 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bob Crow
"James Farrar" wrote in message ... On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 09:07:21 +0000 (UTC), "Brimstone" wrote: James Farrar wrote: On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 07:49:04 +0000 (UTC), "Brimstone" wrote: Dave Liney wrote: "Clive" wrote in message ... In message , Robert Woolley writes On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:42:28 +0100, Clive wrote: In message , Loony Tune writes Drivers got no more money when guards were removed They took extra responsibility for no extra pay? How mean fisted can a company get? I don't think 33k per annum is exacty 'mean fisted'. As Marc says, more police, fewer train staff.... Do you want to have the responsibility of a train plus a thousand passengers for only 33k after overtime and before stoppages? If you think 33k is a low wage then I think you need to think again. There are many people in London earning much less. Also most of use don't have to think about our pay "before stoppages" as we don't feel the need to walk out of jobs on a regular basis. Perhaps if more people were willing to walk out they might have better pay and conditions? If I walked out, I'd get fired. And if all the employees walked out? We'd all get fired. So find a decent employer to work for. |
|
#29
August 1st 05, 12:53 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bob Crow
"James Farrar" wrote in message ... Perhaps if more people were willing to walk out they might have better pay and conditions? If I walked out, I'd get fired. And if all the employees walked out? We'd all get fired. -- Not if you did it legally. http://www.worksmart.org.uk/rights/v...ion.php?eny=59 The very act of unionising would probably get your employer to think again about their poor conditions. |
|
#30
August 1st 05, 12:58 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bob Crow
In message ,
Brimstone writes "James Farrar" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 09:07:21 +0000 (UTC), "Brimstone" wrote: James Farrar wrote: On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 07:49:04 +0000 (UTC), "Brimstone" wrote: Dave Liney wrote: "Clive" wrote in message ... In message , Robert Woolley writes On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:42:28 +0100, Clive wrote: In message , Loony Tune writes Drivers got no more money when guards were removed They took extra responsibility for no extra pay? How mean fisted can a company get? I don't think 33k per annum is exacty 'mean fisted'. As Marc says, more police, fewer train staff.... Do you want to have the responsibility of a train plus a thousand passengers for only 33k after overtime and before stoppages? You've deliberately ignored the "after overtime" how many of you work unsocial hours for a low base wage with a high level of responsibility? -- Clive |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Bob Crow dead | London Transport | |||
| Dacre vs Crow | London Transport | |||
| Bob Crow Eurosceptic? | London Transport | |||
| Bob Crow is a Complete and Utter B*ST*RD! | London Transport | |||
| Bob Crow Gets His Claim in 7 Years Early | London Transport | |||
Linear Mode
