Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alistair Bell wrote:
By the way, someone upthread mentioned that end doors are needed on Thameslink -- really? Even in a double-track tunnel? But wasn't the whole point of ordering 365s on both sides of the river that they were going to run through? (Or is this the Prescottists instituting pointless safety rules again?) I know that the GN&C tunnels are single-bore and small enough that end doors are needed -- that seems fair enough. But I didn't think that would apply to the Thameslink tunnels. If you can run a Pendolino through Primrose Hill/Shugborough/wherever without end doors, why can't you run a 365 through Thameslink? (What's the current status on running 365s between Dover and Folkestone? Are they still banned?) Indeed. An even more extreme example is running Pendolinos through the single-bore down fast tunnel at Linslade - no end doors there! (Incidentally when tilting at full speed they have only a couple of inches to spare on the kinematic envelope through that tunnel, according to the latest MR.) Same applies for 365s on the ECML tunnels near London between KX and Potter's Bar - one of those tunnels has single bores on the slow lines I think, but I forget which. Angus |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Exciting news on Thameslink 2000 (now "Thameslink Project") | London Transport | |||
Thameslink 2000 and other animals | London Transport | |||
Thameslink 2000 | London Transport | |||
THAMESLINK 2000 | London Transport | |||
New Thameslink 2000 proposals? | London Transport |