Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:52:17 GMT, "Alan OBrien"
wrote: The Northern Line has at least twice closed the Bank Branch in the quiet months of July/August to put more speed restrictions in ![]() Seriously, perhaps that is what is needed. Close one line at a time in its entirety, and completely re-lay the track, signalling and other failure-prone equipment. The amount of engineering work required in future would then drastically decrease. I'd bet that this approach would save money in the long term. Trouble is, TPTB refuse to recognise this, despite the fact that it is increasingly becoming the method of choice on the main line. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK When replying please use neil at the above domain 'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read. |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Aug 2005 14:33:02 GMT, Adrian wrote:
Chalfont & Latimer lies between here and Amersham. I very much doubt that all-night services could be justified on the outer reaches of the Met, any more than they could be to High Wycombe or Milton Keynes (for example). What *could* perhaps be justified is a service at 0100 and another at 0200 (then nothing until 05something), which is approximately what MK gets when there isn't engineering work and buses (when these departures still occur, just by bus instead). Because it doesn't stay open at night for the sleepers and freight, however, I doubt the staffing for this could be justified, not to mention the increased staffing levels LUL-type operations require. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK When replying please use neil at the above domain 'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read. |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neil Williams ) gurgled happily, sounding
much like they were saying : Will the retail organisations allow the late running to go ahead, I don't think so. How many high-street shops open before 10am on a Sunday? Other than the kind of smaller shop that opens 24 hours per day, or near to that, I can think of few. The staff have to get there before opening time... |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neil Williams ) gurgled happily, sounding
much like they were saying : Are other similar systems closed for five hours every night? Hamburg's used to be, but now operates 24 hours a day at weekends. Parts of the system are rather old but have not been allowed to get into the embarassing and disgraceful state of LUL. Right. So there's no inherent need to close for five hours each and every night - except, perhaps, for cracks to be wallpapered over. The night bus system, OTOH, is easy to understand and entirely acceptable, if a little slow. That said, the night buses are not busy, because clubbers tend to go out late on the weekend (say leave the house at 10pm) and return home on the first train (~5am). I can see this culture developing in London. If it does, an *earlier* start is what's needed, not a later finish. I'm not necessarily thinking of all-night clubbers or "binge drinkers" roll of eyes I'm thinking more of people who'd go to the theatre/restaurant/cinema or some other event with friends who may live in a variety of different directions around London, then might actually fancy going to a pub and having a chat over a pint or two afterwards. *That's* the kind of social occasion that's going to benefit most from the change of closing time to midnight or 1am. Let's face it, if somebody wants to go and get ******ed, they can do that until dawn already. Bar - Late Bar - Club. Incidentally, I don't see why some consider it is not a requirement to provide public transport for revellers. Why is it any less a requirement to provide for them than for customers of other businesses during the day? Indeed. |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Aug 2005 18:22:57 GMT, Adrian wrote:
The staff have to get there before opening time... Not several hours before opening time. For 10am opening, 9 or 9:30am would be quite sufficient, with suitable staff planning and organisation. Not all shops even open that early; as they're allowed 6 hours (I think), many choose noon-6pm or 11am-5pm. There remain, of course, night buses. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK When replying please use neil at the above domain 'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read. |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Aug 2005 18:27:45 GMT, Adrian wrote:
Right. So there's no inherent need to close for five hours each and every night - except, perhaps, for cracks to be wallpapered over. Agreed. See my other post; some short-term pain (e.g. closing a line for a month or two at a time once to completely retrack and resignal) would be a definite benefit in the long-term. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK When replying please use neil at the above domain 'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read. |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message . 170,
Adrian writes I don't think it fair that LU should stay open later to accomodate late night revellers, whilst starting later in the mornings, causing hard working Londoners grief in getting to work. It's us Londoners that keep London going. How busy are the trains at 5.30am? The ones I drive get pretty busy - all with people going to work and/or the airport. -- Steve Fitzgerald has now left the building. You will find him in London's Docklands, E16, UK (please use the reply to address for email) |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Anderson wrote:
Anyway - The question is... Will LU reflect this in extending the time of the last trains? It's a bit pointless pubs applying for later licences if people still have to leave at the same time to get home. I suppose people will have to drink in a pub near home. Or catch a night bus. Or cycle. Without wanting to be a killjoy, it's an offence under section 12 of the Licensing Act 1872 to be drunk in charge of a carriage. A pedal cycle is a carriage for the purposes of this Act. You might also find that you're a bit prone to wobble if you're riding home from the pub. Matt Ashby |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Aug 2005 08:52:53 GMT, Adrian wrote:
Christine ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying : I don't think it fair that LU should stay open later to accomodate late night revellers, whilst starting later in the mornings, causing hard working Londoners grief in getting to work. It's us Londoners that keep London going. How busy are the trains at 5.30am? And do they really use the full close-time every night? Are other similar systems closed for five hours every night? Well, Paris does. Has 4.5 hour window but certainly finshes around 12.30-01.00 - starts at 05.30. Rob. -- rob at robertwoolley dot co dot uk |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Withnail & I & The Chocolate Factory | London Transport | |||
F&*&%^& toilets | London Transport | |||
New online "Single fare finder" for Tube & DLR | London Transport | |||
Oyster & tube .. not scanning in | London Transport | |||
Heathrow & Piccadilly Tube Question | London Transport |