London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 8th 05, 04:34 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2003
Posts: 199
Default Oyster on NR

On 25 Aug 2005 08:15:43 -0700, "Mizter T" wrote:

Mike Bristow wrote:
In article ,
Alan OBrien wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
I wonder how many people who refuse Oyster cards are working in the
black economy and don't want their regular 5-day a week journies from
A-to-B recorded?

I think the main reason is that some people live in zone 2 north - say
Kentish Town - but work in zone 2 on the other side of zone 1 - say Canary
Wharf. By buying a zone 2 paper weekly they hope to avoid the fare for zone
1 every day, which with Oyster they can't do;


They can't do it with paper tickets, eitherm when the Revinue Protection
crowd get ahold of them.


They shouldn't do it, as it is fare evasion, but just because you
shouldn't do it doesn't mean you can't do it! I know someone who has
done this, I don't approve of it but I know it can be done. I've
overheard someone else being caught doing it by RP staff when changing
Tube lines at Zone 1 interchange stations ("I though my ticket included
Zone 1" - "No sir it doesn't" etc etc).


Some years ago, I used to travel from the northern end of the Victoria
line to West London, changing to the Piccadilly at Green Park.

There were numerous times when ticket checks were done in the
interchange tunnels, precisely for this reason.

Because of this and other notions about 'Big Brother watching over us'
some people may wish to avoid Oyster. I supsect that some NR stations
that are near Tube stations may see a slight rise in the number of
7DTC's sold, but no subsequent increase in passenger traffic.


Additionally, people with paper travelcards can't have journey start
and end times verified for LU "Customer Charter" claims - another
reason for some to avoid Oyster.
--

Cheers,

Jason.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail?
  #2   Report Post  
Old September 9th 05, 03:06 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2005
Posts: 6,077
Default Oyster on NR

Jason wrote:
On 25 Aug 2005 08:15:43 -0700, "Mizter T" wrote:
I've overheard someone else being caught doing it by RP staff when changing
Tube lines at Zone 1 interchange stations ("I though my ticket included
Zone 1" - "No sir it doesn't" etc etc).


Some years ago, I used to travel from the northern end of the Victoria
line to West London, changing to the Piccadilly at Green Park.

There were numerous times when ticket checks were done in the
interchange tunnels, precisely for this reason.


Those aren't the type of journeys that I regularly make during rush
hour (when I guess the RPIs are more likely to be at such locations),
so it's interesting to hear you're experience that such interchanges
are regularly targetted.

Something I'm not sure I've ever seen is a ticket inspection on board a
Tube train though. This leaves open the option for people to travel
though zones on a single Tube train using a paper Travelcard which
doesn't have the correct zonal validity. Examples could include Bethnal
Green to White City with no changes on the Central Line, or Kennington
to Camden Town on the Northern Line.

Because of this and other notions about 'Big Brother watching over us'
some people may wish to avoid Oyster. I supsect that some NR stations
that are near Tube stations may see a slight rise in the number of
7DTC's sold, but no subsequent increase in passenger traffic.


Additionally, people with paper travelcards can't have journey start
and end times verified for LU "Customer Charter" claims - another
reason for some to avoid Oyster.


How very true. That's not something I'd considered.

Years ago, I had a friend who funded all his Tube travelling by
claiming for non-existant delays. His justification, which we all took
issue with at the time, was some vague youthful notion of 'subverting
the system' or some such. His 'subversion' obviously had the convenient
effect of saving him cash! Some years later, after he'd matured
somewhat, when confronted with his past actions he acknowledged he'd
been very much in the wrong.

It still occasionally leads me to wonder how many others out there
might have the brass balls required to be pulling the same stunt at the
moment.

  #3   Report Post  
Old September 9th 05, 11:57 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2005
Posts: 1
Default Oyster on NR

"Mizter T" wrote:
Something I'm not sure I've ever seen is a ticket inspection on board a Tube
train though.


About 3 or 4 years ago I had my ticket inspected on a Jubilee line
train between Green Park and Waterloo. There was a small group of
people in plain clothes standing by the doors when I got on and as soon
as the doors closed and the train departed they whipped out little
police-style leather-bound ID cards and LT badges and fanned through
the car asking to see people's tickets.

Roy

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017