Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/4296968.stm That map looks all wrong, but I don't have time right now to pick the bones out of it. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Rowland" wrote in message http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/4296968.stm That map looks all wrong, but I don't have time right now to pick the bones out of it. The detailed map is available he http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/cc-ex/maps.shtml The charge will end half an hour earlier at 1800 apparently. Ian |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So even more people now can't drive to work in the week, but can't use
the tube at the weekend, requiring both a car and expensive train tickets. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Weaver wrote:
So even more people now can't drive to work in the week, but can't use the tube at the weekend, requiring both a car and expensive train tickets. Very few people in that part of London *require* a car. It is a lifestyle choice, not a necessity for the most part. -- http://gallery120232.fotopic.net/p9632911.html (Skye seen through mist and low cloud from Kyle of Lochalsh in 1999) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 09:21:56 GMT, Chris Tolley
wrote: Paul Weaver wrote: So even more people now can't drive to work in the week, but can't use the tube at the weekend, requiring both a car and expensive train tickets. Very few people in that part of London *require* a car. It is a lifestyle choice, not a necessity for the most part. Quite a few, like me, drive *out* of that tax-grab area against any congestion in the zone, right into congestion around it - westway west-bound for example, Scrubs Lane, all those nice roads which would have more traffic after the area is Kengested and will have even more when the ShepBush mega shopping-opolis (conveniently avoided by the expansion) opens next year. See this for what it is: more tax. Some value is returned in better buses but the whole cost is excessive and fares are still too high. Cars are still required by families and odd-hours workers. The smart way to reduce congestion (not that this expansion has it, 5% of the area at most has congestion) is to close off zones and reduce flow. Classic example Hammersmith bridge. Close it and traffic "evaporates". But hi-tech cameras and 50mi/year "costs" are much more fun than closures and pinching. -- New anti-spam address cmylod at despammed dot com |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Colum Mylod" wrote in message
... The smart way to reduce congestion (not that this expansion has it, 5% of the area at most has congestion) is to close off zones and reduce flow. Classic example Hammersmith bridge. Close it and traffic "evaporates". Er... not quite. I remember a miserable afternoon spent trying to get from Barnes to Hanwell. It should have been a doddle using Hammersmith Bridge, but it was then closed for repairs (is it still closed, or closed again?). Using Chiswick Bridge (the westerly nexus of the North and South Circular Roads) was excruciating because Hammersmith Bridge was closed. The traffic certainly does not "evaporate", even if the residents of the approach roads (some of whom seem very self-centred over this issue) think it does. It simply goes elsewhere (because it has to). I remember a saying my grandmother frequently used - "full bellies never think of empty ones". |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JNugent wrote:
"Colum Mylod" wrote in message ... The smart way to reduce congestion (not that this expansion has it, 5% of the area at most has congestion) is to close off zones and reduce flow. Classic example Hammersmith bridge. Close it and traffic "evaporates". Er... not quite. I remember a miserable afternoon spent trying to get from Barnes to Hanwell. It should have been a doddle using Hammersmith Bridge, but it was then closed for repairs (is it still closed, or closed again?). It's open, and has been IIRC for at least 4 years. Using Chiswick Bridge (the westerly nexus of the North and South Circular Roads) ... Those two roads actually meet at Chiswick Roundabout, and the South Circular Road crosses the river via Kew Bridge. Chiswick Bridge carries the A316, the link to the M3. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard J." wrote...
JNugent wrote: "Colum Mylod" wrote: The smart way to reduce congestion (not that this expansion has it, 5% of the area at most has congestion) is to close off zones and reduce flow. Classic example Hammersmith bridge. Close it and traffic "evaporates". Er... not quite. I remember a miserable afternoon spent trying to get from Barnes to Hanwell. It should have been a doddle using Hammersmith Bridge, but it was then closed for repairs (is it still closed, or closed again?). It's open, and has been IIRC for at least 4 years. Good - though I'm sure I recall a proposal that it should be closed again - and a campaign by Castelnau residents that it should not be reopened after those extenive repairs. Using Chiswick Bridge (the westerly nexus of the North and South Circular Roads) ... Those two roads actually meet at Chiswick Roundabout, and the South Circular Road crosses the river via Kew Bridge. Chiswick Bridge carries the A316, the link to the M3. Quite right - it was Kew Bridge I meant. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Very few people in that part of London *require* a car. It is a
lifestyle choice, not a necessity for the most part. Aside from people that work outside the train/tube hours (i.e. start before 9AM on a sunday). I'm thinking about nurses at Chelsea & Westminster Hospital for example. Basically unless you work government hours you're forced to risk a dangerous night bus that takes 3 times longer than a car, and that assumes there's a direct bus from where you live to where you work, highly unlikely. I'm writing this at 02:31 on a Monday morning, from work, just outside the new extension area. Won't affect me directly as I live west of London. Many of my collegues will have to take a new route in though, along more congested roads. While I'm just outside the zone, If the building was 800 yards East we'd be in it. It's going to cause enough problems with added traffic arround the bush at lunchtime (when some of my shifts start - yes, the shopping centre wont help either). FYI the last tube east from work on a Sunday is 2327, the last train west 0005. Not much good when you finish at 0030. But journeys in the zone will speed up by 5 minutes. Assuming 2 journeys per day, for an £8 cost, the point of the zone is to make life easier for people on more than £48 an hour. Ken - the rich man's mayor. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Colum Mylod wrote:
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 09:21:56 GMT, Chris Tolley Paul Weaver wrote: So even more people now can't drive to work in the week, but can't use the tube at the weekend, requiring both a car and expensive train tickets. Very few people in that part of London *require* a car. It is a lifestyle choice, not a necessity for the most part. Quite a few, like me, drive ... Cars are still required by families If true, one wonders how anyone ever managed before. But since people plainly did manage before, perhaps it isn't a necessity, but a lifestyle choice. -- http://gallery120232.fotopic.net/p9767296.html (4TC unit 8001 on the Weymouth Tramway on 31 Dec 1989) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
London's Congestion charge rises to £11.50 | London Transport | |||
Congestion Charge extension | London Transport | |||
Congestion Charge appeal question | London Transport | |||
Congestion charge cheat | London Transport | |||
Extending the congestion charge zone | London Transport |