Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "turbo" wrote in message .uk... I would like to be able to buy an Oyster reader (similar to that used by inspectors) so I can check that my Oyster has been processed correctly after boarding a bus or tram. The problem is you have no proof that you have paid - at least if I had an Oyster reader if I see a problem with my card I can try to validate my Oyster Card again. Just think what could happen with a contactless system to read the data on the card , when it falls in the hands of those using it for fraudulent reasons.. Just mingle in an underground train with the punters, and obtain all of the personal data stored on it... Is there a reason why you think that there is personal data actually stored on the card. Surely all it has on it is journey information/costs and some reference back into a database so that it can be updated when you add funds. tim |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roger R" wrote in message . .. "Alan J. Flavell" wrote in message . gla.ac.uk... On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Roger R wrote: In this country you are innocent until proved guilty. However, increasing numbers of offences are based solely on the factual evidence, without any need to prove *intention*. [snip] Speed trap cameras are in this catagory too. (not sour grapes I've never been snapped - AFAIK) Speeding is an absolute offense. Travelling without a ticket is not. tim |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . ac.uk,
Alan J. Flavell writes In this country you are innocent until proved guilty. However, increasing numbers of offences are based solely on the factual evidence, without any need to prove *intention*. And in many other cases the defendant has to prove - at least on the balance of probabilities - that a statutory defence applies. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, tim (moved to sweden) wrote:
Speeding is an absolute offense. "offence", in the UK. Travelling without a ticket is not. On national rail, at least, it's a byelaw offence to be in a compulsory ticket area without a valid ticket. |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Alan J. Flavell" wrote in message . gla.ac.uk... On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, tim (moved to sweden) wrote: Speeding is an absolute offense. "offence", in the UK. Travelling without a ticket is not. On national rail, at least, it's a byelaw offence to be in a compulsory ticket area without a valid ticket. punishable by penalty fare, not by criminal convection. tim |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Nick
Long time no hear. I'd forgotten that you'd moved down south to London. Must go for a drink some time. Jerry Alderson (also at virgin dot net.) |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, tim (moved to sweden) wrote:
On national rail, at least, it's a byelaw offence to be in a compulsory ticket area without a valid ticket. punishable by penalty fare, not by criminal convection. The punter /may/ get the opportunity to pay the penalty fare, but prosecution is another option available. Which option is used, depends on circumstances, AIUI. |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 19:25:21 on Fri, 21 Oct
2005, "tim (moved to sweden)" remarked: punishable by penalty fare, not by criminal convection. wossat? A load of hot air? -- Roland Perry |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 21 Oct 2005 07:01:38 -0700, "Richard Adamfi"
wrote: However, if you request to see the CCTV but it is no longer available, then the fact that you were willing to request the CCTV shows strong evidence in your favour of your innocence. Not if you were confident it wouldn't be available :-) |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Alan J. Flavell" wrote in message . gla.ac.uk... On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, tim (moved to sweden) wrote: On national rail, at least, it's a byelaw offence to be in a compulsory ticket area without a valid ticket. punishable by penalty fare, not by criminal convection. The punter /may/ get the opportunity to pay the penalty fare, but prosecution is another option available. But then the evidence of 'intent' is required. It is the poster's contention that this wasn't required. This is only true where the penalty applied is the penalty fare. tim Which option is used, depends on circumstances, AIUI. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Clapham Junction Pink Oyster Reader | London Transport | |||
Excitement as Oyster reader spotted at Brixton | London Transport | |||
Can I buy myself a discounted Network Railcard? | London Transport | |||
Oyster prepay on bus with faulty card reader | London Transport | |||
Oyster reader sighting | London Transport |