Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Mizter T wrote: I wonder what the proceedure is for adding stations to the zones or changing which zones a station is in. I presume TfL must be consulted, and the other London train companies need to OK it as well. I guess that's what ATOC's London Schemes Council is for. Well i'd love to get an answer to what i've been wondering for years now. How come Watford Junction isn't in the travelcard zones when it is nearer to london than say, Epping? It's even within the M25 area! I used to think it was because Virgin stopped there but Virgin don't let people travel to Watford from London. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"GreatWesternSean" wrote in message
oups.com... Well i'd love to get an answer to what i've been wondering for years now. How come Watford Junction isn't in the travelcard zones when it is nearer to london than say, Epping? It's even within the M25 area! I used to think it was because Virgin stopped there but Virgin don't let people travel to Watford from London. Epping was only added to the TfL zone system recently (1998ish) - previously, the stations on the Epping branch of the Central Line outside of Greater London behaved like the Met stations beyond Moor Park do now. The idea is to simplify life for Tube travellers (and for TfL ticketing!). The stations around Hainault, many of which are also in Essex, were in the zone stysem from the start to simplify life for passengers going round the loop. The Met stations remain outside the standard zone system because even in the interests of simplification, it would be silly to treat a 15 minute Surbiton - London journey as the same as a 45 minute Amersham - London journey. So Watford Junction is out because it doesn't have an Underground service. Watford Met is out because that bit of the Met has to go beyond the zone system anyway, so there are no simplification benefits. If TfL were to take over the DC lines (whether as part of a takeover of NLL service specification, or a conversion to the Bakerloo - both mooted by official types recently), things might change, or they might not. NB Watford is only within the M25 area because the M25 bulges out to go round Watford: http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ll=51....0.853226&hl=en -- John Band astic - delete iastic to reply |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() John Band wrote: "GreatWesternSean" wrote in message oups.com... Well i'd love to get an answer to what i've been wondering for years now. How come Watford Junction isn't in the travelcard zones when it is nearer to london than say, Epping? It's even within the M25 area! I used to think it was because Virgin stopped there but Virgin don't let people travel to Watford from London. Epping was only added to the TfL zone system recently (1998ish) - previously, the stations on the Epping branch of the Central Line outside of Greater London behaved like the Met stations beyond Moor Park do now. The idea is to simplify life for Tube travellers (and for TfL ticketing!). The stations around Hainault, many of which are also in Essex, were in the zone stysem from the start to simplify life for passengers going round the loop. You may be right about that, and in that case I was wrong in my other post, and that would mean that the Hainault line was the only bit outside of London when zones started. But I had thought (as I mentioned elsewhere) that it was around the same time as the Hampton Court line, which I definitely needed extensions for up to the early 1990s and then no longer did afterwards. The Met stations remain outside the standard zone system because even in the interests of simplification, it would be silly to treat a 15 minute Surbiton - London journey as the same as a 45 minute Amersham - London journey. So Watford Junction is out because it doesn't have an Underground service. Watford Met is out because that bit of the Met has to go beyond the zone system anyway, so there are no simplification benefits. If TfL were to take over the DC lines (whether as part of a takeover of NLL service specification, or a conversion to the Bakerloo - both mooted by official types recently), things might change, or they might not. NB Watford is only within the M25 area because the M25 bulges out to go round Watford: http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ll=51....0.853226&hl=en -- John Band astic - delete iastic to reply |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 22:27:01 +0000 (UTC), "Chris Read"
wrote: What's the logic in extending Z6 to Epsom Downs and Tattenham Corner, but not to Epsom? Are there particular difficulties caused by Southern 'sharing the flow' from Epsom with SWT? Perhaps because Tattenham Corner is the end of that particular line? -- Terry Harper Website Coordinator, The Omnibus Society http://www.omnibussoc.org |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Perhaps because Tattenham Corner is the end of that particular line?
I'm sure that's it - all the stations mentioned are termini of lines that are partly in GL (and there are no competing operators) save Upper Warlingham (which would be daft to be outside when the Whyteleaves are inside). So it's a bit of an Epping or Hampton Court effect. On my maps Watford is farther out than any of these. That leaves Shepperton as the only such terminus not covered in this way AFAICS. Make those TV audience wannabees urged to head there pay extra? In that area, I don't understand why stations from Kingston to Fulwell are in Zone 5 (as they geographically should be) rather than Zone 6, unless they're trying to keep all the Hamptons together (no pun intended.) Then there's Dartford. It's hard for customers on the 3 north Kent parallels to get from one line to the other without going back to Lewisham which might not be in their zone. Is it permitted to change trains at either Dartford or Lewisham on a travelcard if you promise not to leave the station? |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote Then there's Dartford. It's hard for customers on the 3 north Kent parallels to get from one line to the other without going back to Lewisham which might not be in their zone. Is it permitted to change trains at either Dartford or Lewisham on a travelcard if you promise not to leave the station? Not permitted. There are off-peak trains which loop between Crayford and Slade Green (and these stay within Zone 6, although they cross the Greater London boundary), and a few peak trains which loop between Barnehurst and Slade Green. You can of course use a Travelcard to get to Dartford, as long as you travel on a London bus, and not a train. Peter |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Then there's Dartford. It's hard for customers on the 3 north Kent parallels to get from one line to the other without going back to Lewisham which might not be in their zone. Is it permitted to change trains at either Dartford or Lewisham on a travelcard if you promise not to leave the station? An anomaly is that holders of freedom passes can use Dartford station. |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Epping was only added to the TfL zone system recently (1998ish) - previously, the stations on the Epping branch of the Central Line outside of Greater London behaved like the Met stations beyond Moor Park do now. The idea is to simplify life for Tube travellers (and for TfL ticketing!). The stations around Hainault, many of which are also in Essex, were in the zone stysem from the start to simplify life for passengers going round the loop. All of the stations on the Hainult loop are within walking distance of the Greater London boundary. The main reason for there inclusion was probably so a journey from Woodford to Hainault (both in London) would not be charged excessively because of passing briefly into Essex. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster PAYG: zone 2 to zone 1 via zone 3 | London Transport | |||
Livingstone threatens to levy a further £600 on Londoners | London Transport | |||
Further strike this Sunday | London Transport | |||
The Further Adventures of the Self-Deluding Dom1234/David Knight | London Transport | |||
Worst ten commutes | London Transport |