Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hehehehe.... You hate it??
You want to right the IRFs...... Mal "Paul Corfield" wrote in message ... On 24 Nov 2005 16:12:45 -0800, " wrote: On Wednesday morning, at aboutn 9.50a.m. there was some sort of Victoria Line problem on the Northbound line into Victoria - according to a station announcer a train was due to "come out of a siding" (somewhere between Victoria and Pimlico?) to be the next Northbound train but there was a signal problem, and the line became blocked. [snip] Two questions for those "in the know": 1. Was it inevitable that there would be difficulty in the Southbound train trying to travel North out of the Southbound platform? For example, maybe this was impossible because the next following Southbound train was in block and therefore preventing any other train from "reversing" into its block, even if only to use the cross-over to the Northbound? If so, why did they even attempt to do so? I would say it was not inevitable that the attempt to run north from the s/b platform would fail because of the failure at the sidings. The two ends of the station should run independently of each other. It sounds to me, and I cannot recall what was in the internal daily report, that there was a second failure that then prevented the intended recovery strategy from working. It is the most sensible strategy at Victoria if you are in the position of having the two sidings out of service to the south because you can't get trains back out on to the n/b tracks. There is no point in sending trains to Brixton because you will end up with a huge jam and given past incidents about trains stuck in tunnels great attention is now paid to ensuring trains do not become stuck between stations. 2. How on Earth could such a localised problem on a section South of Victoria effectively paralyse the entire line in both directions? Aren't there procedures in place to allow, for example (as presumably was attempted here), turning trains at Victoria and then continuing a Victoria - Walthamstow service, cutting out the Brixton section? The decision to suspend is often the logical consequence when somewhere like Victoria fails. It is so crucial to the line's operation that you have to suspend, get the power off and allow the repair staff on to track to undertake repairs. The other issue is traction current sections which may not align with where the turnbacks / crossovers are. Therefore you may need to suspend over a larger area to get the power off. Another point is that while loads of people are inconvenienced when a line suspends it does provide a level of certainty about travel options - i.e. the line is NOT running rather than it "might, possibly be running to somewhere on the line at some point in time". I know this seems perverse if you want to use the line but at least you are "forced" to think about using another route. If it's any consolation I hate it when the Vic Line falls over like this as it's the main tube line to get me home. I do have about 10 contingency routes "up my sleeve" so I can keep moving if the worst happens. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Urban myth i am afraid.
The sidings can take 1 train each. In an emergency a secind train can be fitted into the sidings but its not a signal move, its done under rule only under exceptional situations, usually to enable trains to enter Brixton and disgorge customers. It was done on during the 2 attacks. Its a shame the system at Vic failed to work correctly. If it had we could have had a service running. As it was, our private contractors couldn't find the problem....but thats another thread! Mal wrote in message ... Paul Corfield wrote: Seven Sisters - typically north to south via the sidings / depot road. If a train fails in the s/b platform they can and do reverse it back into the sidings. You can't head south from the central terminating Just out of curiousity , how far do the sidings at Brixton go? I've heard the tunnel goes halfway to streatham (urban myth perhaps?) but how far does the track go? Can you fit many trains down there or is it used for storage of some sort? B2003 |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 18:54:55 GMT, "Mal"
wrote: "Paul Corfield" wrote in message .. . On 24 Nov 2005 16:12:45 -0800, " wrote: If it's any consolation I hate it when the Vic Line falls over like this as it's the main tube line to get me home. I do have about 10 contingency routes "up my sleeve" so I can keep moving if the worst happens. Hehehehe.... You hate it?? You want to right the IRFs...... Well I get to read enough of them in JNP land that I don't really want to add in BCV as well. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thats terrible.....i meant write....... bugger!
Mal "Paul Corfield" wrote in message ... On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 18:54:55 GMT, "Mal" wrote: "Paul Corfield" wrote in message . .. On 24 Nov 2005 16:12:45 -0800, " wrote: If it's any consolation I hate it when the Vic Line falls over like this as it's the main tube line to get me home. I do have about 10 contingency routes "up my sleeve" so I can keep moving if the worst happens. Hehehehe.... You hate it?? You want to right the IRFs...... Well I get to read enough of them in JNP land that I don't really want to add in BCV as well. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:25:25 +0000, Tom Anderson wrote: And can you reverse in both directions at Victoria, Warren Street and Seven Sisters? [snipped] Whether the "rare" moves are prevented by the signalling set up I simply don't know. Fair enough. Cheers for the info! tom -- This should be on ox.boring, shouldn't it? |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 21:38 +0000 (GMT Standard Time),
(Colin Rosenstiel) wrote: [Victoria line - Victoria line layout] Victoria was built with a scissors crossover at the North end, wasn;t it? Why on earth did they remove it? I think you're right. No idea why they were removed. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Corfield wrote:
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 21:38 +0000 (GMT Standard Time), (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote: [Victoria line - Victoria line layout] Victoria was built with a scissors crossover at the North end, wasn;t it? Why on earth did they remove it? I think you're right. No idea why they were removed. Because Victoria has got a second scissors crossover south of the station and two central reversing sidings. When the service is buggered from Victoria to Brixton it can be used to reverse the southbound service. The original scissors crossover (just like the one that used to be at Highbury) is thus redundant. http://www.trainweb.org/tubeprune/Vi...en%20Pk-rm.gif refers. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
London Bridge this morning (Wednesday 07/10/2009) | London Transport | |||
My Epping and Ongar railway History website will be have a reopening next wednesday FULL HISTORY"! | London Transport | |||
New York's PATH meeting this Wednesday | London Transport | |||
Lea Bridge station reopening - meeting this Wednesday | London Transport | |||
Victoria Line This Morning | London Transport |