Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Corfield wrote:
I may be horribly out of date but here goes. snip I confess I don't know quite how the interavailable routes work - i.e. where LU fares apply and the TOC has to get a share. I would imagine this is based on a composite of sales and ridership surveys. The existence of ticket gates at places such as Fenchurch Street will provide some extra data as to journey volumes. This is the part that I'm most curious about - whilst looking this up in u.t.l. I came across a thread where someone vehemently stated that Chiltern receives no revenue whatsoever for trains that run to Aylesbury via the Metropolitan Line, while someone else stated in equal fashion that they did. I wondered which statement was true. Obviously, as you said, the presence of ticket gates and Oyster pads makes collecting the necessary data much simpler, and thus the revenue sharing probably follows the actual usage much more closely. snip |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Contactless and revenue checks | London Transport | |||
Sharing an Oyster PAYG | London Transport | |||
Passenger satisfaction with TOCs | London Transport | |||
Ken to TOCs - end of January deadline to sign up for Oyster PAYG | London Transport | |||
NR-only season tickets in London (was: Would it be lawful for non-London train and bus operators to share revenue?) | London Transport |