Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Brimstone" wrote in
: However, the fact remains that a 17 year old has sufficient knowledge to know that if a human body puts itself in the path of a train travelling at 100mph there is only one outcome. Why have compassion for someone so reckless with his own well being? Try answering the question, if only for those who don't have 17 year old children. I doubt that there's anyone reading this who's never done anything dangerous at some time or other. Most of us take minor risks every day of our lives, including you, if you care to think about it. If you fall off the ladder whilst trying to put the fairy on top of the Christmas tree, too bad, you should have had sufficient knowledge to avoid putting yourself in such obvious danger? It may be foolish to trespass on a railway line, but doing so doesn't mean certain death, however much some people here imagine it does. This youth died because he was on a railway line, and presumably misjudged his situation and the danger. Literally thousands of other trespassers on that day, as every day, walked across or along railway lines, then continued about their business unharmed and unconcerned. Millions of other people crossed roads without injury, but a small proportion of them also misjudged, and didn't make it safely. Did these also get what they deserved? Rick. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Rick Hughes wrote: "Brimstone" wrote in : However, the fact remains that a 17 year old has sufficient knowledge to know that if a human body puts itself in the path of a train travelling at 100mph there is only one outcome. Why have compassion for someone so reckless with his own well being? Try answering the question, if only for those who don't have 17 year old children. I doubt that there's anyone reading this who's never done anything dangerous at some time or other. Most of us take minor risks every day of our lives, including you, if you care to think about it. If you fall off the ladder whilst trying to put the fairy on top of the Christmas tree, too bad, you should have had sufficient knowledge to avoid putting yourself in such obvious danger? It may be foolish to trespass on a railway line, but doing so doesn't mean certain death, however much some people here imagine it does. This youth died because he was on a railway line, and presumably misjudged his situation and the danger. Literally thousands of other trespassers on that day, as every day, walked across or along railway lines, then continued about their business unharmed and unconcerned. Millions of other people crossed roads without injury, but a small proportion of them also misjudged, and didn't make it safely. Did these also get what they deserved? Who said he deserved to die? Who said that simply being on or about a railway line meant certain death? He didn't die because he was on a railway line. He died because he was stupid enough to get hit by a fast moving train. Trains Don't Take Prisoners! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Brimstone" wrote in
: Who said he deserved to die? Several posters. Who said that simply being on or about a railway line meant certain death? It seems to be implicit in a number of posts, in this thread and many others, in uk.railway, at least. He didn't die because he was on a railway line. He died because he was stupid enough to get hit by a fast moving train. You say stupidity, I say misjudgement. Your version would imply that any accidental death is because of the stupidity of the victim. Trains Don't Take Prisoners! Pity. Could be a growing source of traffic. Rick. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rick Hughes" wrote
Trains Don't Take Prisoners! Pity. Could be a growing source of traffic. They used to. There was even a telegraphic code - JUG - which meant 'Please reserve the following accommodation for prisoner and escort.' Peter |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Rick Hughes wrote: "Brimstone" wrote in : He didn't die because he was on a railway line. He died because he was stupid enough to get hit by a fast moving train. You say stupidity, I say misjudgement. Your version would imply that any accidental death is because of the stupidity of the victim. So how do you describe someone who puts himself in the path of a heavy, fast moving vehicle that takes almost a mile to stop and can't swerve aside to avoid him? Trains Don't Take Prisoners! Pity. Could be a growing source of traffic. OldLag-Rail anyone? :-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Man dies at Hayes and Harlington station | London Transport | |||
Playing it cool | London Transport | |||
Track Charts or Track maps of the London Underground | London Transport | |||
As Doug been playing with matches ? | London Transport | |||
Paddington Bear at Paddington Station | London Transport |