Loads of lies have been told about the New Years Eve tube strike.



Here's the truth!



http://www.zoneonelondon.co.uk/

Dom1234 wrote:
Loads of lies have been told about the New Years Eve tube strike.
Here's the truth!
http://www.zoneonelondon.co.uk/

Bloody troublemakers should be kicked out.

Ten who would run the tube the bosses couldn't run a **** up in a brewery.

"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:
Loads of lies have been told about the New Years Eve tube strike.
Here's the truth!
http://www.zoneonelondon.co.uk/

Bloody troublemakers should be kicked out.

Dom1234 wrote:
"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:
Loads of lies have been told about the New Years Eve tube strike.
Here's the truth!
http://www.zoneonelondon.co.uk/

Bloody troublemakers should be kicked out.
Ten who would run the tube the bosses couldn't run a **** up in a
brewery.

Did I specify who the troublemakers are?

(BTW - the convention is this NG is for bottom posting. Ta.)

"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:
"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:
Loads of lies have been told about the New Years Eve tube strike.
Here's the truth!
http://www.zoneonelondon.co.uk/

Bloody troublemakers should be kicked out.
Ten who would run the tube the bosses couldn't run a **** up in a
brewery.

Did I specify who the troublemakers are?

(BTW - the convention is this NG is for bottom posting. Ta.)

OK Cheers - so who do you think the trouble makers are?

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:18:05 -0000, "Dom1234" wrote:


"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:
"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:
Loads of lies have been told about the New Years Eve tube strike.
Here's the truth!
http://www.zoneonelondon.co.uk/

Bloody troublemakers should be kicked out.
Ten who would run the tube the bosses couldn't run a **** up in a
brewery.

Did I specify who the troublemakers are?

(BTW - the convention is this NG is for bottom posting. Ta.)

OK Cheers - so who do you think the trouble makers are?


Let's bring this issue back on track. OK so there is misinformation out there
that needs to be knocked on the head and a solution found.

Can't find the solution straight away so a strike is called; fine but why on
31st December? Could you not wait until 1st January or a few days later?

Now, who is being bloodly minded?

David Bradley

"David Bradley" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:18:05 -0000, "Dom1234"
wrote:


"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:
"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:
Loads of lies have been told about the New Years Eve tube strike.
Here's the truth!
http://www.zoneonelondon.co.uk/

Bloody troublemakers should be kicked out.
Ten who would run the tube the bosses couldn't run a **** up in a
brewery.

Did I specify who the troublemakers are?

(BTW - the convention is this NG is for bottom posting. Ta.)

OK Cheers - so who do you think the trouble makers are?


Let's bring this issue back on track. OK so there is misinformation out
there
that needs to be knocked on the head and a solution found.

Can't find the solution straight away so a strike is called; fine but why
on
31st December? Could you not wait until 1st January or a few days later?

Now, who is being bloodly minded?

David Bradley

1. The Mayor wants the tube to run all night on NYE
2. Part of the 35 hour week deal was that staff would work NYE for NO EXTRA
pay.
3. Last NYE as part the deal they did work for no extra
4. Staff also agreed to 200 ticket office jobs going (natural wastage)
5. Now the Mayor, LU bosses and the Government want to axe 500 jobs
6. Would you still work NYE for NO EXtra if your boss reneged on a deal?

The RMT voted on it, accepted it, and their staff are now suffering from
their headlong dash towards accepting it, they didn't explain how the 35
hour week would be implemented and are now reaping the results.

Sorry to anyone who is affected.

(Top Posted to annoy Brimstone)


Dom1234 wrote:
"David Bradley" wrote in message
...

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:18:05 -0000, "Dom1234"
wrote:


"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:

"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:

Loads of lies have been told about the New Years Eve tube strike.
Here's the truth!
http://www.zoneonelondon.co.uk/

Bloody troublemakers should be kicked out.

Ten who would run the tube the bosses couldn't run a **** up in a
brewery.

Did I specify who the troublemakers are?

(BTW - the convention is this NG is for bottom posting. Ta.)


OK Cheers - so who do you think the trouble makers are?


Let's bring this issue back on track. OK so there is misinformation out
there
that needs to be knocked on the head and a solution found.

Can't find the solution straight away so a strike is called; fine but why
on
31st December? Could you not wait until 1st January or a few days later?

Now, who is being bloodly minded?

David Bradley


1. The Mayor wants the tube to run all night on NYE
2. Part of the 35 hour week deal was that staff would work NYE for NO EXTRA
pay.
3. Last NYE as part the deal they did work for no extra
4. Staff also agreed to 200 ticket office jobs going (natural wastage)
5. Now the Mayor, LU bosses and the Government want to axe 500 jobs
6. Would you still work NYE for NO EXtra if your boss reneged on a deal?

"www.waspies.net" wrote in message
...
The RMT voted on it, accepted it, and their staff are now suffering from
their headlong dash towards accepting it, they didn't explain how the 35
hour week would be implemented and are now reaping the results.

Sorry to anyone who is affected.

(Top Posted to annoy Brimstone)


Dom1234 wrote:
"David Bradley" wrote in message
...

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:18:05 -0000, "Dom1234"
wrote:


"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:

"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:

Loads of lies have been told about the New Years Eve tube strike.
Here's the truth!
http://www.zoneonelondon.co.uk/

Bloody troublemakers should be kicked out.

Ten who would run the tube the bosses couldn't run a **** up in a
brewery.

Did I specify who the troublemakers are?

(BTW - the convention is this NG is for bottom posting. Ta.)


OK Cheers - so who do you think the trouble makers are?


Let's bring this issue back on track. OK so there is misinformation out
there
that needs to be knocked on the head and a solution found.

Can't find the solution straight away so a strike is called; fine but why
on
31st December? Could you not wait until 1st January or a few days later?

Now, who is being bloodly minded?

David Bradley


1. The Mayor wants the tube to run all night on NYE
2. Part of the 35 hour week deal was that staff would work NYE for NO
EXTRA pay.
3. Last NYE as part the deal they did work for no extra
4. Staff also agreed to 200 ticket office jobs going (natural wastage)
5. Now the Mayor, LU bosses and the Government want to axe 500 jobs
6. Would you still work NYE for NO EXtra if your boss reneged on a deal?

What "www.waspies.net" has said is partly true but this highlights what a
load of ****E the LU management are. They promised no staff reductions, 200
ticket jobs lossed and full consultation on rosters.

Now they want 500 job losses and imposed rosters. The management have
reneged on the original deal. They are trying to shaft the best union on the
railways.

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:05:29 -0000, "Dom1234"
wrote:

Loads of lies have been told about the New Years Eve tube strike.
Here's the truth!

http://www.zoneonelondon.co.uk/

Which obviously fails to address exactly why Bob Crow and his puppets
chose to strike on the one day that is guaranteed to alienate the
general public against them. The inescapable conclusion is that Bob &
Co. genuinely believed that LUL would cave in in the face of such a
threat; in other words, they have cynically used the enjoyment of
ordinary Londoners to try to force through something so unreasonable
that they know that a threat to strike on any other day of the year
would not work.

It is notable, of course, that while the RMT claims 4,000 members
amongst LU station staff, only 39% of them participated in the strike
ballot, with 1,327 - i.e. 33% of the total number of members - voting
in favour of it.

Of course, we are given to ask exactly who "zoneonelondon.co.uk" are.
Despite first-glance appearances, this is not a general newsite, and
seems to exist only to regurgitate RMT press releases and other union
activist platitudes. It's no surprise that "external links" are
restricted to the RMT, teh Socialist Workers Party, and - presumably
as a half-hearted attempt to appear balance - the Mayor's Office.

The domain is registered to one "David Knight," who has - perhaps
understandably - chosen not to make any other details publicly
available. He's had the domain since 27/01/02, and yet what is
currently there is all he seems to have done with it in almost three
years.
--
Nick Cooper

[Carefully remove the detonators from my e-mail address to reply!]

The London Underground at War, and in Films & TV:
http://www.nickcooper.org.uk/